科学家和期刊必须共同努力保护科学文献的完整性

B. Alberts, M. Robertson
{"title":"科学家和期刊必须共同努力保护科学文献的完整性","authors":"B. Alberts, M. Robertson","doi":"10.12703/r-01-0000011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scientific literature has for some years reflected serious concerns over the irreproducibility of many published scientific results; yet the problem persists. We review here how the prevailing culture contributes to this problem and suggest what needs to change to address it. We build on the evaluation of Buonarati et al. (1) in (2) to illustrate some of the general concerns over current publishing practices – focusing on questionable incentives for authors, editors and publishers of research journals. We then suggest some ways that the integrity of the scientific literature might be strengthened.","PeriodicalId":73016,"journal":{"name":"Faculty reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientists and journals must work together to protect the integrity of the scientific literature\",\"authors\":\"B. Alberts, M. Robertson\",\"doi\":\"10.12703/r-01-0000011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The scientific literature has for some years reflected serious concerns over the irreproducibility of many published scientific results; yet the problem persists. We review here how the prevailing culture contributes to this problem and suggest what needs to change to address it. We build on the evaluation of Buonarati et al. (1) in (2) to illustrate some of the general concerns over current publishing practices – focusing on questionable incentives for authors, editors and publishers of research journals. We then suggest some ways that the integrity of the scientific literature might be strengthened.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faculty reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faculty reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12703/r-01-0000011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faculty reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12703/r-01-0000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几年来,科学文献反映了对许多已发表的科学成果不可复制性的严重关切;但问题依然存在。我们在这里回顾了主流文化是如何导致这个问题的,并提出了解决这个问题需要改变的地方。我们以Buonarati等人的评估为基础。(1)在(2)中阐述了对当前出版实践的一些普遍担忧,重点是对研究期刊的作者、编辑和出版商的可疑激励。然后,我们提出了一些加强科学文献完整性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scientists and journals must work together to protect the integrity of the scientific literature
The scientific literature has for some years reflected serious concerns over the irreproducibility of many published scientific results; yet the problem persists. We review here how the prevailing culture contributes to this problem and suggest what needs to change to address it. We build on the evaluation of Buonarati et al. (1) in (2) to illustrate some of the general concerns over current publishing practices – focusing on questionable incentives for authors, editors and publishers of research journals. We then suggest some ways that the integrity of the scientific literature might be strengthened.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What’s New in The Diagnosis and Treatment of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI)? ‘All About’ Extremophiles Recent advances in the understanding of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Recent advances in understanding TCR signaling: a synaptic perspective. Recent advances in understanding Alzheimer's Disease: diagnosis and management strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1