印度尼西亚远程医学教育:10年活动分析

S. Shimizu, Shunta Tomimatsu, Kuriko Kudo, Shintaro Ueda, A. Kekalih, D. Makmun, R. Estiasari, A. Oki, T. Moriyama
{"title":"印度尼西亚远程医学教育:10年活动分析","authors":"S. Shimizu, Shunta Tomimatsu, Kuriko Kudo, Shintaro Ueda, A. Kekalih, D. Makmun, R. Estiasari, A. Oki, T. Moriyama","doi":"10.29086/jisfteh.8.e6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: With ongoing development of technology, and especially amid the current COVID-19 pandemic, there is rapidly increasing need for remote communications, including in the field of medical education. This study aimed to evaluate our telemedicine activities between Japan and Indonesia. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data acquired for the period 2010–2019 inclusive, looking at number of programmes, content, participating sites, and videoconferencing systems. We also digitally sent questionnaires to attendees to request their evaluation of image quality and programmes. Results: There were a total 135 programmes, with 29 participating institutions in Indonesia. The number of programmes increased rapidly in 2017, following a rapid increase of participating sites in 2016. Programmes included endoscopy (50 programmes, 37%), neurology (25, 19%), and dentistry (12, 9%). Between 5 and 10 sites connected with 81 programmes (60% of all), and more than 10 sites with 33 (24%). The most commonly used videoconferencing system was Vidyo (108, 80%), followed by Zoom (15, 11%). Participating institutions were located among 19 cities on the five major islands. Image quality received a favourable evaluation from 98% (504/516) of questionnaire respondents, with 100% (400/400) holding a favourable view of the programmes. Conclusion: Remote medical education expanded in Indonesia in the 10 years under review. This expansion is expected to continue to foster more specialists and it is anticipated to improve medical care nationwide.","PeriodicalId":93212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote Medical Education in Indonesia: Analysis of 10 Years of Activities\",\"authors\":\"S. Shimizu, Shunta Tomimatsu, Kuriko Kudo, Shintaro Ueda, A. Kekalih, D. Makmun, R. Estiasari, A. Oki, T. Moriyama\",\"doi\":\"10.29086/jisfteh.8.e6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: With ongoing development of technology, and especially amid the current COVID-19 pandemic, there is rapidly increasing need for remote communications, including in the field of medical education. This study aimed to evaluate our telemedicine activities between Japan and Indonesia. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data acquired for the period 2010–2019 inclusive, looking at number of programmes, content, participating sites, and videoconferencing systems. We also digitally sent questionnaires to attendees to request their evaluation of image quality and programmes. Results: There were a total 135 programmes, with 29 participating institutions in Indonesia. The number of programmes increased rapidly in 2017, following a rapid increase of participating sites in 2016. Programmes included endoscopy (50 programmes, 37%), neurology (25, 19%), and dentistry (12, 9%). Between 5 and 10 sites connected with 81 programmes (60% of all), and more than 10 sites with 33 (24%). The most commonly used videoconferencing system was Vidyo (108, 80%), followed by Zoom (15, 11%). Participating institutions were located among 19 cities on the five major islands. Image quality received a favourable evaluation from 98% (504/516) of questionnaire respondents, with 100% (400/400) holding a favourable view of the programmes. Conclusion: Remote medical education expanded in Indonesia in the 10 years under review. This expansion is expected to continue to foster more specialists and it is anticipated to improve medical care nationwide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29086/jisfteh.8.e6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29086/jisfteh.8.e6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:随着技术的不断发展,特别是在当前新冠肺炎大流行期间,对远程通信的需求迅速增加,包括在医学教育领域。本研究旨在评估我们在日本和印度尼西亚之间的远程医疗活动。方法:我们回顾性分析了2010-2019年期间获得的数据,包括节目数量、内容、参与网站和视频会议系统。我们还以数字方式向与会者发送了问卷,要求他们对图像质量和节目进行评估。结果:共有135个方案,其中29个参与机构在印度尼西亚。继2016年参与网站迅速增加后,2017年的节目数量迅速增加。项目包括内窥镜检查(50个项目,37%)、神经病学(25,19%)和牙科(12,9%)。有5至10个网站与81个节目(占全部节目的60%)相连,有10多个网站与33个节目(24%)相连。最常用的视频会议系统是Vidyo(10880%),其次是Zoom(1511%)。参与机构分布在五个主要岛屿上的19个城市中。98%(504/516)的问卷受访者对图像质量给予了良好评价,100%(400/400)的受访者对节目持好感。结论:在所审查的10年中,印度尼西亚扩大了远程医学教育。这一扩张预计将继续培养更多的专家,并有望改善全国范围内的医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Remote Medical Education in Indonesia: Analysis of 10 Years of Activities
Introduction: With ongoing development of technology, and especially amid the current COVID-19 pandemic, there is rapidly increasing need for remote communications, including in the field of medical education. This study aimed to evaluate our telemedicine activities between Japan and Indonesia. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data acquired for the period 2010–2019 inclusive, looking at number of programmes, content, participating sites, and videoconferencing systems. We also digitally sent questionnaires to attendees to request their evaluation of image quality and programmes. Results: There were a total 135 programmes, with 29 participating institutions in Indonesia. The number of programmes increased rapidly in 2017, following a rapid increase of participating sites in 2016. Programmes included endoscopy (50 programmes, 37%), neurology (25, 19%), and dentistry (12, 9%). Between 5 and 10 sites connected with 81 programmes (60% of all), and more than 10 sites with 33 (24%). The most commonly used videoconferencing system was Vidyo (108, 80%), followed by Zoom (15, 11%). Participating institutions were located among 19 cities on the five major islands. Image quality received a favourable evaluation from 98% (504/516) of questionnaire respondents, with 100% (400/400) holding a favourable view of the programmes. Conclusion: Remote medical education expanded in Indonesia in the 10 years under review. This expansion is expected to continue to foster more specialists and it is anticipated to improve medical care nationwide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unhelpful Helplines: Inaccessibility for the Deaf Patients Perceptions on Teledermatology Through Video-consulting During the Covid19-pandemic: Report on a Belgian Cohort COVID-19 and eHealth: A Promise or Peril Paradox? Scaling Up Digital Health In Conflict Countries COVID-19 as a Catalyst for Telehealth Growth in India: Some Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1