原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民对法医风险评估的看法

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Psychiatry Psychology and Law Pub Date : 2023-04-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254
Samantha Venner, Natasha Maharaj, Diane Sivasubramaniam, Stephane M Shepherd
{"title":"原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民对法医风险评估的看法","authors":"Samantha Venner, Natasha Maharaj, Diane Sivasubramaniam, Stephane M Shepherd","doi":"10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Risk assessment instruments are used to estimate risk of recidivism and aid in decision-making and treatment planning. However, many of these instruments, including the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR), are validated on predominantly Western populations, and research has questioned whether the factors included in the LS/RNR adequately capture the experiences and needs of non-Western communities, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. The current study aimed to canvas the opinions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community justice workers as to the suitability of the LS/RNR for use with this population. A general qualitative methodology was adopted to gain in-depth information through the facilitation of a focus group, and data were analysed thematically. Whilst participants agreed that the LS/RNR risk factors are relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders, they reported that the instrument did not adequately capture relevant culturally specific considerations and made suggestions to improve the LS/RNR.</p>","PeriodicalId":51553,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives on forensic risk assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Venner, Natasha Maharaj, Diane Sivasubramaniam, Stephane M Shepherd\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Risk assessment instruments are used to estimate risk of recidivism and aid in decision-making and treatment planning. However, many of these instruments, including the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR), are validated on predominantly Western populations, and research has questioned whether the factors included in the LS/RNR adequately capture the experiences and needs of non-Western communities, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. The current study aimed to canvas the opinions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community justice workers as to the suitability of the LS/RNR for use with this population. A general qualitative methodology was adopted to gain in-depth information through the facilitation of a focus group, and data were analysed thematically. Whilst participants agreed that the LS/RNR risk factors are relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders, they reported that the instrument did not adequately capture relevant culturally specific considerations and made suggestions to improve the LS/RNR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11018076/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry Psychology and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2023.2192254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险评估工具用于估算累犯风险,帮助决策和治疗规划。然而,包括 "服务水平/风险、需求、响应性"(LS/RNR)在内的许多此类工具都是在以西方人为主的人群中验证过的,研究人员对 LS/RNR 中包含的因素是否能充分反映包括土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民在内的非西方社区的经历和需求提出了质疑。本研究旨在收集土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民社区司法工作者对 LS/RNR 是否适用于这一人群的意见。研究采用了一般定性方法,通过协助焦点小组获得深入信息,并对数据进行专题分析。虽然参与者一致认为 LS/RNR 风险因素与土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民罪犯相关,但他们报告说,该工具没有充分捕捉到相关的特定文化因素,并提出了改进 LS/RNR 的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander perspectives on forensic risk assessment.

Risk assessment instruments are used to estimate risk of recidivism and aid in decision-making and treatment planning. However, many of these instruments, including the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR), are validated on predominantly Western populations, and research has questioned whether the factors included in the LS/RNR adequately capture the experiences and needs of non-Western communities, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. The current study aimed to canvas the opinions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community justice workers as to the suitability of the LS/RNR for use with this population. A general qualitative methodology was adopted to gain in-depth information through the facilitation of a focus group, and data were analysed thematically. Whilst participants agreed that the LS/RNR risk factors are relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders, they reported that the instrument did not adequately capture relevant culturally specific considerations and made suggestions to improve the LS/RNR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Psychiatry, Psychology and Law is rapidly becoming a driving force behind the up-to-date examination of forensic issues in psychiatry and psychology. It is a fully refereed journal with outstanding academic and professional representation on its editorial board and is aimed at health, mental health and legal professionals. The journal aims to publish and disseminate information regarding research and development in forensic psychiatry, forensic psychology and areas of law and other disciplines in which psychiatry and psychology have a relevance. Features of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law include review articles; analyses of professional issues, controversies and developments; case studies; original empirical studies; book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The power of words: the impact of police interviewer’s judgment error and apology on sexual violence victims in simulated interviews What are the chances? – Validity assessment and the cumulative binomial distribution in the evaluation of fitness to stand trial Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP-29) and Inventory of Problems–Memory (IOP-M) failure rates in patients with severe psychosis with and without criminal convictions Is the continuum of coercion in psychiatry really a continuum? A statistical implication analysis Perceived coercion in psychiatric inpatients: a validation study of the Romanian-language version of the Admission Experience Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1