新冠肺炎大流行期间菲律宾的移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)进行系统搜索、用例映射和质量评估

BMC digital health Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-06 DOI:10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2
Aldren Gonzales, Razel Custodio, Marie Carmela Lapitan, Mary Ann Ladia
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间菲律宾的移动应用程序:使用移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)进行系统搜索、用例映射和质量评估","authors":"Aldren Gonzales, Razel Custodio, Marie Carmela Lapitan, Mary Ann Ladia","doi":"10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the Philippines, various mobile health apps were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic with very little knowledge in terms of their quality. The aims of this paper were 1) to systemically search for mobile apps with COVID-19 pandemic use case that are implemented in the Philippines; 2) to assess the apps using Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS); and 3) to identify the critical points for future improvements of these apps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify existing mobile applications with COVID-19 pandemic use case employed in the Philippines, Google Play and Apple App Stores were systematically searched. Further search was conducted using the Google Search. Data were extracted from the app web store profile and apps were categorized according to use cases. Mobile apps that met the inclusion criteria were independently assessed and scored by two researchers using the MARS-a 23-item, expert-based rating scale for assessing the quality of mHealth applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 apps were identified and assessed using MARS. The majority of the apps are designed for managing exposure to COVID-19 and for promoting health monitoring. The overall MARS score of all the apps is 3.62 points (SD 0.7), with a maximum score of 4.7 for an app used for telehealth and a minimum of 2.3 for a COVID-19 health declaration app. The majority (<i>n</i> = 19, 70%) of the apps are equal to or exceeded the minimum \"acceptable\" MARS score of 3.0. Looking at the categories, the apps for raising awareness received the highest MARS score of 4.58 (SD 0.03) while those designed for managing exposure to COVID-19 received the lowest mean score of 3.06 (SD 0.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a heterogenous quality of mHealth apps implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. The study also identified areas to better improve the tools. Considering that mHealth is expected to be an integral part of the healthcare system post-pandemic, the results warrant better policies and guidance in the development and implementation to ensure quality across the board and as a result, positively impact health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":72426,"journal":{"name":"BMC digital health","volume":" ","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile applications in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic search, use case mapping, and quality assessment using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).\",\"authors\":\"Aldren Gonzales, Razel Custodio, Marie Carmela Lapitan, Mary Ann Ladia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the Philippines, various mobile health apps were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic with very little knowledge in terms of their quality. The aims of this paper were 1) to systemically search for mobile apps with COVID-19 pandemic use case that are implemented in the Philippines; 2) to assess the apps using Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS); and 3) to identify the critical points for future improvements of these apps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To identify existing mobile applications with COVID-19 pandemic use case employed in the Philippines, Google Play and Apple App Stores were systematically searched. Further search was conducted using the Google Search. Data were extracted from the app web store profile and apps were categorized according to use cases. Mobile apps that met the inclusion criteria were independently assessed and scored by two researchers using the MARS-a 23-item, expert-based rating scale for assessing the quality of mHealth applications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 27 apps were identified and assessed using MARS. The majority of the apps are designed for managing exposure to COVID-19 and for promoting health monitoring. The overall MARS score of all the apps is 3.62 points (SD 0.7), with a maximum score of 4.7 for an app used for telehealth and a minimum of 2.3 for a COVID-19 health declaration app. The majority (<i>n</i> = 19, 70%) of the apps are equal to or exceeded the minimum \\\"acceptable\\\" MARS score of 3.0. Looking at the categories, the apps for raising awareness received the highest MARS score of 4.58 (SD 0.03) while those designed for managing exposure to COVID-19 received the lowest mean score of 3.06 (SD 0.6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a heterogenous quality of mHealth apps implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. The study also identified areas to better improve the tools. Considering that mHealth is expected to be an integral part of the healthcare system post-pandemic, the results warrant better policies and guidance in the development and implementation to ensure quality across the board and as a result, positively impact health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC digital health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9985954/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/3/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在菲律宾,在COVID-19大流行期间实施了各种移动健康应用程序,但对其质量知之甚少。本文的目的是1)系统地搜索在菲律宾实施的具有COVID-19大流行用例的移动应用程序;2)使用移动应用评级量表(MARS)对应用程序进行评估;3)确定这些应用程序未来改进的关键点。方法:系统检索Google Play和Apple App store,以识别菲律宾现有的COVID-19大流行用例移动应用程序。使用谷歌搜索进行了进一步的搜索。数据从应用程序网络商店中提取,并根据用例对应用程序进行分类。符合纳入标准的移动应用程序由两名研究人员使用mars -一种基于专家的23项评估量表进行独立评估和评分,用于评估移动健康应用程序的质量。结果:共使用MARS识别和评估了27个应用程序。大多数应用程序都是为管理COVID-19暴露和促进健康监测而设计的。所有应用程序的MARS总分为3.62分(标准差0.7),用于远程医疗的应用程序最高得分为4.7分,COVID-19健康声明应用程序最低得分为2.3分。大多数(n = 19.70%)应用程序等于或超过“可接受”的MARS最低得分3.0分。从类别来看,提高意识的应用程序的MARS得分最高,为4.58 (SD 0.03),而为管理COVID-19暴露而设计的应用程序的平均得分最低,为3.06 (SD 0.6)。结论:在菲律宾COVID-19大流行期间,移动医疗应用程序的质量存在异质性。该研究还确定了可以更好地改进这些工具的领域。鉴于移动医疗有望成为大流行后医疗保健系统的重要组成部分,因此需要在制定和实施方面提供更好的政策和指导,以确保全面的质量,从而对健康结果产生积极影响。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址为10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mobile applications in the Philippines during the COVID-19 pandemic: systematic search, use case mapping, and quality assessment using the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS).

Background: In the Philippines, various mobile health apps were implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic with very little knowledge in terms of their quality. The aims of this paper were 1) to systemically search for mobile apps with COVID-19 pandemic use case that are implemented in the Philippines; 2) to assess the apps using Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS); and 3) to identify the critical points for future improvements of these apps.

Methods: To identify existing mobile applications with COVID-19 pandemic use case employed in the Philippines, Google Play and Apple App Stores were systematically searched. Further search was conducted using the Google Search. Data were extracted from the app web store profile and apps were categorized according to use cases. Mobile apps that met the inclusion criteria were independently assessed and scored by two researchers using the MARS-a 23-item, expert-based rating scale for assessing the quality of mHealth applications.

Results: A total of 27 apps were identified and assessed using MARS. The majority of the apps are designed for managing exposure to COVID-19 and for promoting health monitoring. The overall MARS score of all the apps is 3.62 points (SD 0.7), with a maximum score of 4.7 for an app used for telehealth and a minimum of 2.3 for a COVID-19 health declaration app. The majority (n = 19, 70%) of the apps are equal to or exceeded the minimum "acceptable" MARS score of 3.0. Looking at the categories, the apps for raising awareness received the highest MARS score of 4.58 (SD 0.03) while those designed for managing exposure to COVID-19 received the lowest mean score of 3.06 (SD 0.6).

Conclusions: There is a heterogenous quality of mHealth apps implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. The study also identified areas to better improve the tools. Considering that mHealth is expected to be an integral part of the healthcare system post-pandemic, the results warrant better policies and guidance in the development and implementation to ensure quality across the board and as a result, positively impact health outcomes.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44247-023-00007-2.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Potential sources of inaccuracy in the Apple watch series 4 energy expenditure estimation algorithm during wheelchair propulsion From an idea to the marketplace: identifying and addressing ethical and regulatory considerations across the digital health product-development lifecycle Efficacy of digital interventions on physical activity promotion in individuals with noncommunicable diseases: an overview of systematic reviews Software symptomcheckR: an R package for analyzing and visualizing symptom checker triage performance Introduction and content analysis of "Nurse's voice" WhatsApp group during COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1