{"title":"焦点穷尽性与对比主题的反穷尽性","authors":"Satoshi Tomioka","doi":"10.1515/tl-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Themain concept that guides through this commentary is exhaustivity associated with focus. Although this issue is not central to the authors’ analysis, I believe that it leads to intriguing and puzzling questions that are worth considering. In their discussion in 4.3, Kamali and Krifka (henceforth, K & K) analyze focus exhaustivity by using the notion of ‘denegation’, the speech act version of negation. Informally speaking, the denegation of a speech act a is the refraining from engaging a. What is not clear to me is whether denegation is strong enough to guarantee the exhaustivity effect of focus. To illustrate this point, let us compare the two focalization strategies: focus and contrastive topic.","PeriodicalId":46148,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Linguistics","volume":"46 1","pages":"123 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tl-2020-0007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exhaustivity of focus and anti-exhaustivity of contrastive topic\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Tomioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/tl-2020-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Themain concept that guides through this commentary is exhaustivity associated with focus. Although this issue is not central to the authors’ analysis, I believe that it leads to intriguing and puzzling questions that are worth considering. In their discussion in 4.3, Kamali and Krifka (henceforth, K & K) analyze focus exhaustivity by using the notion of ‘denegation’, the speech act version of negation. Informally speaking, the denegation of a speech act a is the refraining from engaging a. What is not clear to me is whether denegation is strong enough to guarantee the exhaustivity effect of focus. To illustrate this point, let us compare the two focalization strategies: focus and contrastive topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"123 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/tl-2020-0007\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2020-0007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2020-0007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exhaustivity of focus and anti-exhaustivity of contrastive topic
Themain concept that guides through this commentary is exhaustivity associated with focus. Although this issue is not central to the authors’ analysis, I believe that it leads to intriguing and puzzling questions that are worth considering. In their discussion in 4.3, Kamali and Krifka (henceforth, K & K) analyze focus exhaustivity by using the notion of ‘denegation’, the speech act version of negation. Informally speaking, the denegation of a speech act a is the refraining from engaging a. What is not clear to me is whether denegation is strong enough to guarantee the exhaustivity effect of focus. To illustrate this point, let us compare the two focalization strategies: focus and contrastive topic.
期刊介绍:
Theoretical Linguistics is an open peer review journal. Each issue contains one long target article about a topic of general linguistic interest, together with several shorter reactions, comments and reflections on it. With this format, the journal aims to stimulate discussion in linguistics and adjacent fields of study, in particular across schools of different theoretical orientations.