电力生产商的商品风险对冲:捷克电力市场案例研究

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.3280/efe2022-001002
Jakub Zezula
{"title":"电力生产商的商品风险对冲:捷克电力市场案例研究","authors":"Jakub Zezula","doi":"10.3280/efe2022-001002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Every power producer is facing the risk of an adverse price movement of commodities used for the power production and power itself in the meantime between cash flow planning and the actual power production. This study analyzes process of hedging the commodity market risk with usage of derivatives with financial settlement as an alternative to physical ones. For this purpose a hypothetical power producer operating a gas power unit was selected. Based on the real Czech power market data of 2019 this paper simulates expected cash flow, assesses potential risk for the producer and compares real cash flow of an unhedged position with a position hedged via futures contracts and spread options with financial settlement. For the risk evaluation Monte Carlo simulation and value at risk methods are used. As the most effective way to hedge the market risk of 2019 proved itself the futures hedge with monthly hedging tenor with an alternative in a short call option position. Practical implications: The study is written in a practical approach to the market risk man- agement process so that could be applicable in any company active in the power market facing the risk of commodity price movements regardless the input commodity used for the electric- ity production. Using the data of the Czech power market of 2019 the paper presents the case of a real power market participant.","PeriodicalId":38445,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commodity risk hedging of a power producer: Case study of the Czech power market\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Zezula\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/efe2022-001002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Every power producer is facing the risk of an adverse price movement of commodities used for the power production and power itself in the meantime between cash flow planning and the actual power production. This study analyzes process of hedging the commodity market risk with usage of derivatives with financial settlement as an alternative to physical ones. For this purpose a hypothetical power producer operating a gas power unit was selected. Based on the real Czech power market data of 2019 this paper simulates expected cash flow, assesses potential risk for the producer and compares real cash flow of an unhedged position with a position hedged via futures contracts and spread options with financial settlement. For the risk evaluation Monte Carlo simulation and value at risk methods are used. As the most effective way to hedge the market risk of 2019 proved itself the futures hedge with monthly hedging tenor with an alternative in a short call option position. Practical implications: The study is written in a practical approach to the market risk man- agement process so that could be applicable in any company active in the power market facing the risk of commodity price movements regardless the input commodity used for the electric- ity production. Using the data of the Czech power market of 2019 the paper presents the case of a real power market participant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/efe2022-001002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/efe2022-001002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现金流规划和实际电力生产之间,每个电力生产商都面临着用于电力生产的商品和电力本身的不利价格变动的风险。本研究分析了使用金融结算替代实物结算的衍生品对冲商品市场风险的过程。为此,选择了一个运行燃气发电机组的假想发电厂。基于2019年捷克电力市场的实际数据,本文模拟了预期现金流,评估了生产商的潜在风险,并将未对冲头寸的实际现金流与通过期货合约和价差期权对冲的头寸进行了比较。风险评估采用蒙特卡罗模拟和风险价值法。作为对冲2019年市场风险的最有效方式,事实证明,期货对冲具有每月对冲期限,并在短期看涨期权头寸中提供替代方案。实际意义:该研究以市场风险管理过程的实用方法编写,适用于任何活跃在电力市场中面临商品价格波动风险的公司,无论电力生产所用的投入商品是什么。利用2019年捷克电力市场的数据,本文介绍了一个真实的电力市场参与者的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commodity risk hedging of a power producer: Case study of the Czech power market
Every power producer is facing the risk of an adverse price movement of commodities used for the power production and power itself in the meantime between cash flow planning and the actual power production. This study analyzes process of hedging the commodity market risk with usage of derivatives with financial settlement as an alternative to physical ones. For this purpose a hypothetical power producer operating a gas power unit was selected. Based on the real Czech power market data of 2019 this paper simulates expected cash flow, assesses potential risk for the producer and compares real cash flow of an unhedged position with a position hedged via futures contracts and spread options with financial settlement. For the risk evaluation Monte Carlo simulation and value at risk methods are used. As the most effective way to hedge the market risk of 2019 proved itself the futures hedge with monthly hedging tenor with an alternative in a short call option position. Practical implications: The study is written in a practical approach to the market risk man- agement process so that could be applicable in any company active in the power market facing the risk of commodity price movements regardless the input commodity used for the electric- ity production. Using the data of the Czech power market of 2019 the paper presents the case of a real power market participant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment
Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
An assessment of the Iberian Exception to control electricity prices Mapping the empirical relationship between environmental performance and social preferences: Evidence from macro data Public perception of residential solar energy in Minnesota's urban areas Strategy for the implementation of sustainable green fuels in Indonesia Is reuse always better than recycling? A critical analysis of the proposed European Regulation on Packaging and Packaging Waste and a debunking of its Impact Assessment study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1