肯尼亚基利菲县的反政治和免费孕产妇保健服务

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES African Studies Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00020184.2023.2241833
S. O. Ombere, E. Nyambedha, T. Haller, S. Merten
{"title":"肯尼亚基利菲县的反政治和免费孕产妇保健服务","authors":"S. O. Ombere, E. Nyambedha, T. Haller, S. Merten","doi":"10.1080/00020184.2023.2241833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Maternal healthcare is a global agenda. Kenya introduced free maternity services (FMS) in 2013 to allow women to give birth for free in all government public health facilities. The introduction of FMS was timely due to the high maternal mortality rate in Kenya. FMS was also introduced to fulfil the Jubilee Party government’s elections campaign promises. It is, however, not known how primary beneficiaries and health providers perceived the FMS roll-out following the presidential directive in 2013. This article aims to explore the roles of political contestations in FMS as a social protection scheme in Kenya. In this qualitative ethnographic study in Kilifi County, we interviewed the mothers who utilised FMS and the health workers who implemented the policy. The data gathered was analysed contextually and thematically. The prevailing narrative from the health services professionals and the mothers who participated in our study is that FMS is ‘the president’s thing’ and has a clear political orientation; it is seen as deceiving the public in two ways: first by shrouding political interests, and second by adding to the burden of women, as delivery was not free – all the other services and medication before and after birth came at a cost. Health workers feel helpless and frustrated and, in most cases, they have to cope with meagre resources to ensure safe births. In some cases, quality of care is compromised due to supply-side constraints. This article shows how social protection has been used to gain political mileage and has not considered the local needs of the maternal healthcare system.","PeriodicalId":51769,"journal":{"name":"African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Politics and Free Maternal Health Services in Kilifi County, Kenya\",\"authors\":\"S. O. Ombere, E. Nyambedha, T. Haller, S. Merten\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00020184.2023.2241833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Maternal healthcare is a global agenda. Kenya introduced free maternity services (FMS) in 2013 to allow women to give birth for free in all government public health facilities. The introduction of FMS was timely due to the high maternal mortality rate in Kenya. FMS was also introduced to fulfil the Jubilee Party government’s elections campaign promises. It is, however, not known how primary beneficiaries and health providers perceived the FMS roll-out following the presidential directive in 2013. This article aims to explore the roles of political contestations in FMS as a social protection scheme in Kenya. In this qualitative ethnographic study in Kilifi County, we interviewed the mothers who utilised FMS and the health workers who implemented the policy. The data gathered was analysed contextually and thematically. The prevailing narrative from the health services professionals and the mothers who participated in our study is that FMS is ‘the president’s thing’ and has a clear political orientation; it is seen as deceiving the public in two ways: first by shrouding political interests, and second by adding to the burden of women, as delivery was not free – all the other services and medication before and after birth came at a cost. Health workers feel helpless and frustrated and, in most cases, they have to cope with meagre resources to ensure safe births. In some cases, quality of care is compromised due to supply-side constraints. This article shows how social protection has been used to gain political mileage and has not considered the local needs of the maternal healthcare system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2023.2241833\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2023.2241833","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要孕产妇保健是一项全球性议程。肯尼亚于2013年推出了免费产妇服务,允许妇女在所有政府公共卫生设施免费分娩。由于肯尼亚的产妇死亡率很高,采用FMS是及时的。FMS的推出也是为了履行银禧党政府在竞选中的承诺。然而,目前尚不清楚主要受益人和医疗服务提供者如何看待2013年总统指令后推出的FMS。本文旨在探讨政治竞争在肯尼亚FMS作为一项社会保护计划中的作用。在基利菲县的这项定性民族志研究中,我们采访了使用FMS的母亲和实施该政策的卫生工作者。对收集到的数据进行了背景分析和主题分析。参与我们研究的卫生服务专业人员和母亲们普遍认为,FMS是“总统的事”,有明确的政治方向;它被视为以两种方式欺骗公众:第一种是掩盖政治利益,第二种是增加妇女的负担,因为分娩不是免费的&分娩前后的所有其他服务和药物都是有代价的。卫生工作者感到无助和沮丧,在大多数情况下,他们不得不应付微薄的资源来确保安全分娩。在某些情况下,由于供应方面的限制,护理质量受到影响。这篇文章展示了社会保护是如何被用来获得政治利益的,而没有考虑到当地孕产妇保健系统的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anti-Politics and Free Maternal Health Services in Kilifi County, Kenya
ABSTRACT Maternal healthcare is a global agenda. Kenya introduced free maternity services (FMS) in 2013 to allow women to give birth for free in all government public health facilities. The introduction of FMS was timely due to the high maternal mortality rate in Kenya. FMS was also introduced to fulfil the Jubilee Party government’s elections campaign promises. It is, however, not known how primary beneficiaries and health providers perceived the FMS roll-out following the presidential directive in 2013. This article aims to explore the roles of political contestations in FMS as a social protection scheme in Kenya. In this qualitative ethnographic study in Kilifi County, we interviewed the mothers who utilised FMS and the health workers who implemented the policy. The data gathered was analysed contextually and thematically. The prevailing narrative from the health services professionals and the mothers who participated in our study is that FMS is ‘the president’s thing’ and has a clear political orientation; it is seen as deceiving the public in two ways: first by shrouding political interests, and second by adding to the burden of women, as delivery was not free – all the other services and medication before and after birth came at a cost. Health workers feel helpless and frustrated and, in most cases, they have to cope with meagre resources to ensure safe births. In some cases, quality of care is compromised due to supply-side constraints. This article shows how social protection has been used to gain political mileage and has not considered the local needs of the maternal healthcare system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Studies
African Studies AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Discourse of Secession in Novuyo Rosa Tshuma’s House of Stone (Un)doing Gender: The Ethnographic Significance of Mbube Dirge Black Diasporic Subjectivity and Lacanian Lack of Home: A Reading of Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah Laying Waste to History: Recyclia and Urban Art Traditions in Mozambique Local Market Institutions and Solid Waste Management in Accra’s Open-Air Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1