退伍军人的谈话圈:印度城市居民和重新本土化的地方

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Material Religion Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/17432200.2021.2015927
Natalie Avalos
{"title":"退伍军人的谈话圈:印度城市居民和重新本土化的地方","authors":"Natalie Avalos","doi":"10.1080/17432200.2021.2015927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While the boundaries of Indigeneity as a category are generally contested in Indian country, urban spaces provide opportunities for affinity and multiple expressions of Indigenous identity to coexist and even thrive. In Albuquerque, like many major cities, inter-tribal Indian identity centered on grassroots political activity increasingly recognizes Indigeneity as transnational and hemispheric, meaning that Indigenous peoples migrating from other parts of the Americas or around the world contribute to its greater Indigenous diversity (Ramirez 2007). Urban Indians in Albuquerque are composed of multiple peoples from diverse national and tribal identities, however, their points of convergence in the city, such as in ceremonial, sovereignty, and stewardship contexts enables a transnational expression of peoplehood to emerge. Indigenous sovereignty has been theorized as an articulation of peoplehood, defined by scholars as the persistence of a people who share a sacred history, religion, language, and land (Holm, Pearson, and Chavis 2003). In this article, I explore the ways urban Indian peoplehood emerges from the re-Indigenizing praxis of material life, such as talking circles, ceremony, and pottery-making, reflecting the generative culture making Native studies scholars call resurgence (Simpson 2011) and that moves away from essentialist and static definitions of Native identity that rely on blood quantum (Smith 2015).","PeriodicalId":18273,"journal":{"name":"Material Religion","volume":"18 1","pages":"92 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Veterans’ Talking Circle: Urban Indian Peoplehood and Re-Indigenizing Places\",\"authors\":\"Natalie Avalos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17432200.2021.2015927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract While the boundaries of Indigeneity as a category are generally contested in Indian country, urban spaces provide opportunities for affinity and multiple expressions of Indigenous identity to coexist and even thrive. In Albuquerque, like many major cities, inter-tribal Indian identity centered on grassroots political activity increasingly recognizes Indigeneity as transnational and hemispheric, meaning that Indigenous peoples migrating from other parts of the Americas or around the world contribute to its greater Indigenous diversity (Ramirez 2007). Urban Indians in Albuquerque are composed of multiple peoples from diverse national and tribal identities, however, their points of convergence in the city, such as in ceremonial, sovereignty, and stewardship contexts enables a transnational expression of peoplehood to emerge. Indigenous sovereignty has been theorized as an articulation of peoplehood, defined by scholars as the persistence of a people who share a sacred history, religion, language, and land (Holm, Pearson, and Chavis 2003). In this article, I explore the ways urban Indian peoplehood emerges from the re-Indigenizing praxis of material life, such as talking circles, ceremony, and pottery-making, reflecting the generative culture making Native studies scholars call resurgence (Simpson 2011) and that moves away from essentialist and static definitions of Native identity that rely on blood quantum (Smith 2015).\",\"PeriodicalId\":18273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Material Religion\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"92 - 105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Material Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17432200.2021.2015927\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Material Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17432200.2021.2015927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要虽然在印度国家,“愤怒”作为一个类别的界限普遍存在争议,但城市空间为原住民身份的亲和力和多种表达提供了共存甚至繁荣的机会。在阿尔伯克基,与许多大城市一样,以基层政治活动为中心的部落间印第安人身份越来越认识到Indigenity是跨国的和半球性的,这意味着从美洲其他地区或世界各地迁移的土著人民有助于其更大的土著多样性(Ramirez 2007)。阿尔伯克基的城市印第安人由来自不同民族和部落身份的多个民族组成,然而,他们在城市中的融合点,如仪式、主权和管理背景,使民族身份的跨国表达得以出现。土著主权被理论化为对民族身份的表达,学者们将其定义为拥有神圣历史、宗教、语言和土地的民族的持久性(Holm、Pearson和Chavis,2003年)。在这篇文章中,我探索了印度城市人民如何从物质生活的重新本土化实践中产生,如谈话圈、仪式和陶器制作,反映了使原住民研究学者称之为复兴的生成文化(Simpson 2011),并摆脱了依赖血量的原住民身份的本质主义和静态定义(Smith 2015)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Veterans’ Talking Circle: Urban Indian Peoplehood and Re-Indigenizing Places
Abstract While the boundaries of Indigeneity as a category are generally contested in Indian country, urban spaces provide opportunities for affinity and multiple expressions of Indigenous identity to coexist and even thrive. In Albuquerque, like many major cities, inter-tribal Indian identity centered on grassroots political activity increasingly recognizes Indigeneity as transnational and hemispheric, meaning that Indigenous peoples migrating from other parts of the Americas or around the world contribute to its greater Indigenous diversity (Ramirez 2007). Urban Indians in Albuquerque are composed of multiple peoples from diverse national and tribal identities, however, their points of convergence in the city, such as in ceremonial, sovereignty, and stewardship contexts enables a transnational expression of peoplehood to emerge. Indigenous sovereignty has been theorized as an articulation of peoplehood, defined by scholars as the persistence of a people who share a sacred history, religion, language, and land (Holm, Pearson, and Chavis 2003). In this article, I explore the ways urban Indian peoplehood emerges from the re-Indigenizing praxis of material life, such as talking circles, ceremony, and pottery-making, reflecting the generative culture making Native studies scholars call resurgence (Simpson 2011) and that moves away from essentialist and static definitions of Native identity that rely on blood quantum (Smith 2015).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Material Religion
Material Religion RELIGION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Distance to home does not influence treatment success during and after inpatient treatment in adolescents with anorexia nervosa. Making the Gods Speak: The Ritual Production of Revelation in Chinese Religious History The Curious Case of the Condom: How the Secular Matters in the Netherlands Agency, Images, and Visual Culture: the impact of Hans Belting Hans Belting (1935–2023): Images Beyond “The Era of Art”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1