分析和棒球卡价值

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Managerial Finance Pub Date : 2023-07-31 DOI:10.1108/mf-05-2023-0325
Thomas H. Thompson, Kabir C. Sen
{"title":"分析和棒球卡价值","authors":"Thomas H. Thompson, Kabir C. Sen","doi":"10.1108/mf-05-2023-0325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe authors contrast Beckett and Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) baseball card valuations. Also, the authors contrast the Bill James statistics for winshares (WIN) and reference.com statistics for wins above replacement (WAR).Design/methodology/approachThis study examines the impact of analytics on Topp. 1957 baseball card values.FindingsThe authors' examination of variables that influence Topps 1957 baseball card values yields similar results for mint and very good rated cards over the early period (1982), pre-strike (1989), post-strike (1998) and recent (2009) periods. In single variable and multiple regressions, Baseball Hall of Fame (HOF) membership and New York Yankee (NYY) nostalgia coefficient are significant at the 5% level or higher for mint and very good rated cards over all reported periods. The Brooklyn Dodger (BD) parameter is significant at the 5% level or higher in single variable regressions for all reported periods and for 1982 and 1989 for multiple regressions. Reflecting a lack of nostalgia, the New York Giant card coefficients are statistically insignificant over all periods. Also, the authors see a lack of negative bias for Black-player cards. The authors observe that Black-player card coefficients are positive and sometimes statistically significant. This indicates a positive relationship between Black-player cards and prices.Originality/valueThis is the first study to examine the impact of WINS and WAR analytics on baseball card values.","PeriodicalId":18140,"journal":{"name":"Managerial Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytics and baseball card values\",\"authors\":\"Thomas H. Thompson, Kabir C. Sen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mf-05-2023-0325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe authors contrast Beckett and Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) baseball card valuations. Also, the authors contrast the Bill James statistics for winshares (WIN) and reference.com statistics for wins above replacement (WAR).Design/methodology/approachThis study examines the impact of analytics on Topp. 1957 baseball card values.FindingsThe authors' examination of variables that influence Topps 1957 baseball card values yields similar results for mint and very good rated cards over the early period (1982), pre-strike (1989), post-strike (1998) and recent (2009) periods. In single variable and multiple regressions, Baseball Hall of Fame (HOF) membership and New York Yankee (NYY) nostalgia coefficient are significant at the 5% level or higher for mint and very good rated cards over all reported periods. The Brooklyn Dodger (BD) parameter is significant at the 5% level or higher in single variable regressions for all reported periods and for 1982 and 1989 for multiple regressions. Reflecting a lack of nostalgia, the New York Giant card coefficients are statistically insignificant over all periods. Also, the authors see a lack of negative bias for Black-player cards. The authors observe that Black-player card coefficients are positive and sometimes statistically significant. This indicates a positive relationship between Black-player cards and prices.Originality/valueThis is the first study to examine the impact of WINS and WAR analytics on baseball card values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Managerial Finance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Managerial Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-05-2023-0325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Managerial Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-05-2023-0325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的对比贝克特和专业体育认证(PSA)棒球卡的价值。此外,作者还对比了Bill James的胜率统计数据(WIN)和reference.com的胜率统计数据(WAR)。设计/方法/方法本研究探讨分析对Topp. 1957棒球卡价值的影响。研究结果:作者对影响Topps 1957年棒球卡价值的变量进行了研究,在早期(1982年)、罢工前(1989年)、罢工后(1998年)和最近(2009年)时期,薄荷和非常好的评级卡的价值得出了类似的结果。在单变量和多元回归中,棒球名人堂(HOF)成员资格和纽约洋基队(NYY)怀旧系数在所有报告期间的薄荷和非常好的评级卡片的5%或更高水平上显着。在所有报告时期的单变量回归中,布鲁克林道奇(BD)参数在5%或更高的水平上是显著的,在1982年和1989年的多变量回归中是显著的。纽约巨人队的卡片系数在所有时期的统计上都是微不足道的,这反映了怀旧情绪的缺乏。此外,作者还发现黑人玩家的牌没有负面偏见。作者观察到,黑人玩家的牌系数是正的,有时在统计上是显著的。这表明黑人玩家的牌和价格之间存在正相关关系。原创性/价值这是第一个研究WINS和WAR分析对棒球卡价值影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analytics and baseball card values
PurposeThe authors contrast Beckett and Professional Sports Authenticator (PSA) baseball card valuations. Also, the authors contrast the Bill James statistics for winshares (WIN) and reference.com statistics for wins above replacement (WAR).Design/methodology/approachThis study examines the impact of analytics on Topp. 1957 baseball card values.FindingsThe authors' examination of variables that influence Topps 1957 baseball card values yields similar results for mint and very good rated cards over the early period (1982), pre-strike (1989), post-strike (1998) and recent (2009) periods. In single variable and multiple regressions, Baseball Hall of Fame (HOF) membership and New York Yankee (NYY) nostalgia coefficient are significant at the 5% level or higher for mint and very good rated cards over all reported periods. The Brooklyn Dodger (BD) parameter is significant at the 5% level or higher in single variable regressions for all reported periods and for 1982 and 1989 for multiple regressions. Reflecting a lack of nostalgia, the New York Giant card coefficients are statistically insignificant over all periods. Also, the authors see a lack of negative bias for Black-player cards. The authors observe that Black-player card coefficients are positive and sometimes statistically significant. This indicates a positive relationship between Black-player cards and prices.Originality/valueThis is the first study to examine the impact of WINS and WAR analytics on baseball card values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Managerial Finance
Managerial Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Managerial Finance provides an international forum for the publication of high quality and topical research in the area of finance, such as corporate finance, financial management, financial markets and institutions, international finance, banking, insurance and risk management, real estate and financial education. Theoretical and empirical research is welcome as well as cross-disciplinary work, such as papers investigating the relationship of finance with other sectors.
期刊最新文献
The effects of FinTech adoption on bank loan spreads Twitter-based economic uncertainties and time-frequency connectedness among cryptocurrencies Charity begins at the office: issuing cheap stock and stock options to employees and insiders before going public Corporate spin-offs and stock performance: a comparative study of pure and composite schemes Dividend omissions and dividend cuts behaviour: a dynamic random-effect probit panel regression analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1