一种针刀手术装置的研制

F.F.D.A. Ravaglia, A. C. Junior
{"title":"一种针刀手术装置的研制","authors":"F.F.D.A. Ravaglia, A. C. Junior","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-806258/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Introduction: Nowadays, a new era of orthopedic surgery is taking place. Procedures like video surgery, ultrasound-guided interventions, invasive pain interventions, orthopedic procedures, hydro dissection, dry needling, thermography-assisted pain management, and modern acupuncture started to be widely performed1,2. Background: In 2011 and 2012, Ravaglia & Cliquet presented papers on an Arthroscopic Needle-Knife Surgical Prototype Device (ANKSD)2 in Prague, TWC 20112, and in Dubai, OWC 20123. It was a paper presenting a prototype of a needle-knife for orthopedic procedures based on an 18G11/2 needle. Ravaglia and Cliquet wrote the paper “Comparison of two different needles used as knife on knee arthroscopic portal scalpel procedures”4, which was presented at the XXVI SICOT Triennial World Congress, in Guangzhou, China, in 2015. This research compares arthroscopic portal incisions using an 18G11/2 needle or a metal guide intravenous catheter 14Gx2. They concluded that there were no differences in complications such as infections, wound healing, hematoma, and skin healing time. After this, these researchers started a virtual development of a new needle-knife surgical device. Objective: The aim of the project is a virtual development of a needle-knife surgical device to be useful for minimally invasive ultrasound-assisted orthopedic surgical procedures, videos arthroscopic portals augmentation, and other surgical procedures. Method: Three different needle devices were compared. One is a base model 1 and the other two are experimental models (2 and 3). They are based on a metal guide for intravenous catheter 14Gx2''. The base one model 1 is the metal guide for intravenous catheter 14Gx2''; the experimental model 2 is a flat beveled edge, and experimental model 3 is a board bevel edge6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. They are all graduated, parylene-coated, with a stop handle needle guard. The devices are multifunctional: Infusion, aspiration, and surgical sever.The devices were developed by 3D Design 3D STEP Standard Format, Catia V5 Format, and 2D Format Design and 3D Model. They were performed through simulation (Software Simulia Abaqus). They were biomechanically simulated with Virtual Biomechanical Strength Simulation17,18,19,20. The Strengths were assessed by Needle Strength Analysis (CAE Simulation)21.Results: For the displacement result, stiffness assessment, we have 7.48 mm for the baseline needle, 8.08mm for model 2, an increase of 8%, and for model 3 we have 7.75 mm, an increase of 3.6%. Conclusion: These devices seem suitable for echo-assisted orthopedic surgery interventions and other procedures according to virtual analysis. Further in vivo procedures shall be performed.","PeriodicalId":78321,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Needle-Knife Surgical Device\",\"authors\":\"F.F.D.A. Ravaglia, A. C. Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-806258/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Introduction: Nowadays, a new era of orthopedic surgery is taking place. Procedures like video surgery, ultrasound-guided interventions, invasive pain interventions, orthopedic procedures, hydro dissection, dry needling, thermography-assisted pain management, and modern acupuncture started to be widely performed1,2. Background: In 2011 and 2012, Ravaglia & Cliquet presented papers on an Arthroscopic Needle-Knife Surgical Prototype Device (ANKSD)2 in Prague, TWC 20112, and in Dubai, OWC 20123. It was a paper presenting a prototype of a needle-knife for orthopedic procedures based on an 18G11/2 needle. Ravaglia and Cliquet wrote the paper “Comparison of two different needles used as knife on knee arthroscopic portal scalpel procedures”4, which was presented at the XXVI SICOT Triennial World Congress, in Guangzhou, China, in 2015. This research compares arthroscopic portal incisions using an 18G11/2 needle or a metal guide intravenous catheter 14Gx2. They concluded that there were no differences in complications such as infections, wound healing, hematoma, and skin healing time. After this, these researchers started a virtual development of a new needle-knife surgical device. Objective: The aim of the project is a virtual development of a needle-knife surgical device to be useful for minimally invasive ultrasound-assisted orthopedic surgical procedures, videos arthroscopic portals augmentation, and other surgical procedures. Method: Three different needle devices were compared. One is a base model 1 and the other two are experimental models (2 and 3). They are based on a metal guide for intravenous catheter 14Gx2''. The base one model 1 is the metal guide for intravenous catheter 14Gx2''; the experimental model 2 is a flat beveled edge, and experimental model 3 is a board bevel edge6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. They are all graduated, parylene-coated, with a stop handle needle guard. The devices are multifunctional: Infusion, aspiration, and surgical sever.The devices were developed by 3D Design 3D STEP Standard Format, Catia V5 Format, and 2D Format Design and 3D Model. They were performed through simulation (Software Simulia Abaqus). They were biomechanically simulated with Virtual Biomechanical Strength Simulation17,18,19,20. The Strengths were assessed by Needle Strength Analysis (CAE Simulation)21.Results: For the displacement result, stiffness assessment, we have 7.48 mm for the baseline needle, 8.08mm for model 2, an increase of 8%, and for model 3 we have 7.75 mm, an increase of 3.6%. Conclusion: These devices seem suitable for echo-assisted orthopedic surgery interventions and other procedures according to virtual analysis. Further in vivo procedures shall be performed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-806258/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-806258/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导读:如今,一个新的骨科手术时代正在发生。视频手术、超声引导干预、侵入性疼痛干预、骨科手术、水解剖、干针、热成像辅助疼痛管理和现代针灸等治疗方法开始广泛应用1,2。背景:2011年和2012年,Ravaglia & Cliquet分别在布拉格(TWC 20112)和迪拜(OWC 20123)发表了关于关节镜针刀手术原型装置(ANKSD)2的论文。这是一篇论文,介绍了一种基于18G11/2针的骨科手术用针刀的原型。Ravaglia和Cliquet撰写了一篇题为“膝关节镜门静脉手术刀手术中两种不同针头用作刀的比较”的论文,该论文于2015年在中国广州举行的第二十六届SICOT三年一次的世界大会上发表。本研究比较了使用18G11/2针和14Gx2金属导尿管的关节镜门静脉切口。他们得出结论,在感染、伤口愈合、血肿和皮肤愈合时间等并发症方面没有差异。在此之后,这些研究人员开始了一种新的针刀手术设备的虚拟开发。目的:该项目的目的是虚拟开发一种针刀手术装置,用于微创超声辅助骨科手术、视频关节镜门静脉增强和其他外科手术。方法:对三种不同的针具进行比较。一个是基础模型1,另外两个是实验模型(2和3)。它们是基于静脉导管金属导轨14Gx2”。底座型号1为静脉导管金属导轨14Gx2”;实验模型2为平面斜边,实验模型3为板斜边6、7、8、9、10、11、12、13、14、15、16。他们都是毕业,聚苯乙烯涂层,与停止处理针保护。这些装置是多功能的:输注、抽吸和手术切断。设备采用3D设计3D STEP标准格式、Catia V5格式和2D格式设计和3D模型开发。通过仿真软件(Software Simulia Abaqus)进行模拟。使用Virtual Biomechanical Strength simulation进行生物力学模拟17,18,19,20。采用针强度分析(CAE Simulation)21评估其强度。结果:对于位移结果,刚度评估,基线针为7.48 mm,模型2为8.08mm,增加8%,模型3为7.75 mm,增加3.6%。结论:根据虚拟分析,这些装置适合于超声辅助骨科手术干预和其他手术。进一步的体内程序将被执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing a Needle-Knife Surgical Device
Introduction: Nowadays, a new era of orthopedic surgery is taking place. Procedures like video surgery, ultrasound-guided interventions, invasive pain interventions, orthopedic procedures, hydro dissection, dry needling, thermography-assisted pain management, and modern acupuncture started to be widely performed1,2. Background: In 2011 and 2012, Ravaglia & Cliquet presented papers on an Arthroscopic Needle-Knife Surgical Prototype Device (ANKSD)2 in Prague, TWC 20112, and in Dubai, OWC 20123. It was a paper presenting a prototype of a needle-knife for orthopedic procedures based on an 18G11/2 needle. Ravaglia and Cliquet wrote the paper “Comparison of two different needles used as knife on knee arthroscopic portal scalpel procedures”4, which was presented at the XXVI SICOT Triennial World Congress, in Guangzhou, China, in 2015. This research compares arthroscopic portal incisions using an 18G11/2 needle or a metal guide intravenous catheter 14Gx2. They concluded that there were no differences in complications such as infections, wound healing, hematoma, and skin healing time. After this, these researchers started a virtual development of a new needle-knife surgical device. Objective: The aim of the project is a virtual development of a needle-knife surgical device to be useful for minimally invasive ultrasound-assisted orthopedic surgical procedures, videos arthroscopic portals augmentation, and other surgical procedures. Method: Three different needle devices were compared. One is a base model 1 and the other two are experimental models (2 and 3). They are based on a metal guide for intravenous catheter 14Gx2''. The base one model 1 is the metal guide for intravenous catheter 14Gx2''; the experimental model 2 is a flat beveled edge, and experimental model 3 is a board bevel edge6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. They are all graduated, parylene-coated, with a stop handle needle guard. The devices are multifunctional: Infusion, aspiration, and surgical sever.The devices were developed by 3D Design 3D STEP Standard Format, Catia V5 Format, and 2D Format Design and 3D Model. They were performed through simulation (Software Simulia Abaqus). They were biomechanically simulated with Virtual Biomechanical Strength Simulation17,18,19,20. The Strengths were assessed by Needle Strength Analysis (CAE Simulation)21.Results: For the displacement result, stiffness assessment, we have 7.48 mm for the baseline needle, 8.08mm for model 2, an increase of 8%, and for model 3 we have 7.75 mm, an increase of 3.6%. Conclusion: These devices seem suitable for echo-assisted orthopedic surgery interventions and other procedures according to virtual analysis. Further in vivo procedures shall be performed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Essential Interconnection of the Reticular Formation, Intermediolateral Nucleus, and Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis: A Comprehensive View on Cellular Homeostasis Improving Behavioural and Social Skills in Children with Down Syndrome through Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Effects on Parenting Skills and Stress in Caregivers The Impact of Stress on Academic Performance: Strategies for High School Students The New Human University Study: Structure-Stage Growth in a One Year Transformational Learning Program Effect of Viewing Children’s Movies in Literary Arabic on Kindergartners’ Oral Skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1