{"title":"《更小气更平常》","authors":"M. Greaney","doi":"10.1525/NCL.2021.75.4.417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Michael Greaney, “‘The Meaner & More Usual &c.’: Everybody in Emma” (pp. 417-440)\n This essay aims to read Jane Austen’s Emma (1815) not as a portrait of a pampered individual but as a story of collective or communal selfhood—that is, as the story of everybody. “Everybody”—the term is used approximately one hundred times in this novel—in Emma is both more and less than a village or a neighborhood. Spread and shared across people, discourses, bodies, and institutions, “everybodiness” is variously apprehended as public opinion, or a ubiquitous collective gaze, or a shared repertoire of constantly updated gossip-narratives, without ever being quite reducible to any one of these. With a mixture of disdain and disquiet, Emma equates everybodiness with banal group-think, senseless chatter, lackluster mediocrity, and oppressive sameness—but, even as it thinks these superciliously undemocratic thoughts, Austen’s novel grants “everybody” narrative space in which to contest the terms of its own marginalization.","PeriodicalId":54037,"journal":{"name":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE","volume":"75 1","pages":"417-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Meaner & More Usual &c.”\",\"authors\":\"M. Greaney\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/NCL.2021.75.4.417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Michael Greaney, “‘The Meaner & More Usual &c.’: Everybody in Emma” (pp. 417-440)\\n This essay aims to read Jane Austen’s Emma (1815) not as a portrait of a pampered individual but as a story of collective or communal selfhood—that is, as the story of everybody. “Everybody”—the term is used approximately one hundred times in this novel—in Emma is both more and less than a village or a neighborhood. Spread and shared across people, discourses, bodies, and institutions, “everybodiness” is variously apprehended as public opinion, or a ubiquitous collective gaze, or a shared repertoire of constantly updated gossip-narratives, without ever being quite reducible to any one of these. With a mixture of disdain and disquiet, Emma equates everybodiness with banal group-think, senseless chatter, lackluster mediocrity, and oppressive sameness—but, even as it thinks these superciliously undemocratic thoughts, Austen’s novel grants “everybody” narrative space in which to contest the terms of its own marginalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NINETEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"417-440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NINETEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCL.2021.75.4.417\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NINETEENTH-CENTURY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/NCL.2021.75.4.417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Michael Greaney,“The Meaner&More Usual&c.:Emma中的每个人”(第417-440页)这篇文章的目的不是将简·奥斯汀的《Emma》(1815年)解读为一个娇生惯养的个人的肖像,而是一个集体或集体自我的故事——也就是说,解读为每个人的故事。“每个人”——这个词在这部小说中被使用了大约一百次——在Emma中,它或多或少比一个村庄或社区要小。“每一个身体”在人、话语、身体和机构中传播和共享,被不同地理解为公众舆论,或无处不在的集体凝视,或不断更新的八卦叙事的共享剧目,而从来没有被简化为任何一种。带着轻蔑和不安的混合,Emma将每个人都等同于平庸的集体思维、毫无意义的闲聊、平庸和令人压抑的千篇一律——但是,即使它认为这些傲慢的不民主思想,奥斯汀的小说也为“每个人”提供了叙事空间,让他们可以在其中质疑自己被边缘化的条件。
Michael Greaney, “‘The Meaner & More Usual &c.’: Everybody in Emma” (pp. 417-440)
This essay aims to read Jane Austen’s Emma (1815) not as a portrait of a pampered individual but as a story of collective or communal selfhood—that is, as the story of everybody. “Everybody”—the term is used approximately one hundred times in this novel—in Emma is both more and less than a village or a neighborhood. Spread and shared across people, discourses, bodies, and institutions, “everybodiness” is variously apprehended as public opinion, or a ubiquitous collective gaze, or a shared repertoire of constantly updated gossip-narratives, without ever being quite reducible to any one of these. With a mixture of disdain and disquiet, Emma equates everybodiness with banal group-think, senseless chatter, lackluster mediocrity, and oppressive sameness—but, even as it thinks these superciliously undemocratic thoughts, Austen’s novel grants “everybody” narrative space in which to contest the terms of its own marginalization.
期刊介绍:
From Ozymandias to Huckleberry Finn, Nineteenth-Century Literature unites a broad-based group of transatlantic authors and poets, literary characters, and discourses - all discussed with a keen understanding of nineteenth -century literary history and theory. The major journal for publication of new research in its field, Nineteenth-Century Literature features articles that span across disciplines and explore themes in gender, history, military studies, psychology, cultural studies, and urbanism. The journal also reviews annually over 70 volumes of scholarship, criticism, comparative studies, and new editions of nineteenth-century English and American literature.