三种亲缘关系密切的鸟类(Calidris;Scolopacidae)的繁殖叫声结构

IF 1 4区 生物学 Q3 ZOOLOGY Canadian Journal of Zoology Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1139/cjz-2022-0211
E. Miller, P. Tomkovich, V. Arkhipov, C. Handel
{"title":"三种亲缘关系密切的鸟类(Calidris;Scolopacidae)的繁殖叫声结构","authors":"E. Miller, P. Tomkovich, V. Arkhipov, C. Handel","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2022-0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyzed calls of three related sandpipers to document species’ similarities and differences. We hypothesized that functionally different calls would differ in degree of divergence. We studied two nuptial calls (complex “Song” and rhythmically repeated aerial call, RRC) of males, and a general-purpose call (“alarm” trill, AT) given by parents of both sexes in the presence of humans and other potential predators, in a small clade: great knot, Calidris tenuirostris (Horsfeld, 1821); surfbird, C. virgata (Gmelin, 1789); and red knot, C. canutus (Linnaeus 1758). Calls diverged unevenly across species, but RRCs and Song diverged most and ATs least. Vocalizations of great knot and surfbird were most similar to one another, in agreement with a recently proposed phylogeny. Despite species differences in single acoustic traits, calls were evolutionarily conservative at higher structural levels, such as rhythmic temporal delivery of RRCs and harmonic structure (e.g., the fundamental frequency was commonly suppressed). Some acoustic qualities that differed across species were similar across call types within species (e.g., tonality in red knot calls). Trait similarity across different calls suggests that a species’ calls cannot evolve independently of one another: common mechanisms of vocal production across different calls may impede differentiation within a species’ repertoire.","PeriodicalId":9484,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structure of breeding calls in three closely related bird species (Calidris; Scolopacidae)\",\"authors\":\"E. Miller, P. Tomkovich, V. Arkhipov, C. Handel\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cjz-2022-0211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyzed calls of three related sandpipers to document species’ similarities and differences. We hypothesized that functionally different calls would differ in degree of divergence. We studied two nuptial calls (complex “Song” and rhythmically repeated aerial call, RRC) of males, and a general-purpose call (“alarm” trill, AT) given by parents of both sexes in the presence of humans and other potential predators, in a small clade: great knot, Calidris tenuirostris (Horsfeld, 1821); surfbird, C. virgata (Gmelin, 1789); and red knot, C. canutus (Linnaeus 1758). Calls diverged unevenly across species, but RRCs and Song diverged most and ATs least. Vocalizations of great knot and surfbird were most similar to one another, in agreement with a recently proposed phylogeny. Despite species differences in single acoustic traits, calls were evolutionarily conservative at higher structural levels, such as rhythmic temporal delivery of RRCs and harmonic structure (e.g., the fundamental frequency was commonly suppressed). Some acoustic qualities that differed across species were similar across call types within species (e.g., tonality in red knot calls). Trait similarity across different calls suggests that a species’ calls cannot evolve independently of one another: common mechanisms of vocal production across different calls may impede differentiation within a species’ repertoire.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Zoology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2022-0211\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2022-0211","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们分析了三种相关鹬的叫声,以记录物种的相似性和差异性。我们假设功能不同的呼叫在分歧程度上会有所不同。我们研究了雄性的两种婚礼叫声(复杂的“Song”和有节奏重复的空中叫声,RRC),以及两性父母在人类和其他潜在捕食者存在的情况下发出的一种通用叫声(“alarm”颤音,AT),在一个小分支中:大结,Calidris tenuirostris(Horsfeld,1821);冲浪鸟C.virgata(Gmelin,1789);和红结C.canutus(林奈1758)。不同物种之间的叫声差异不均衡,但RRC和Song的分歧最大,AT的分歧最小。大节鸟和冲浪鸟的发音最相似,这与最近提出的系统发育一致。尽管在单个声学特征上存在物种差异,但在更高的结构水平上,如RRC的节律性时间传递和谐波结构(例如,基频通常被抑制),叫声在进化上是保守的。一些因物种而异的音质在物种内不同的叫声类型之间是相似的(例如,红结叫声的音调)。不同叫声之间的特征相似性表明,一个物种的叫声不能独立进化:不同叫声之间声音产生的共同机制可能会阻碍一个物种曲目中的分化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structure of breeding calls in three closely related bird species (Calidris; Scolopacidae)
We analyzed calls of three related sandpipers to document species’ similarities and differences. We hypothesized that functionally different calls would differ in degree of divergence. We studied two nuptial calls (complex “Song” and rhythmically repeated aerial call, RRC) of males, and a general-purpose call (“alarm” trill, AT) given by parents of both sexes in the presence of humans and other potential predators, in a small clade: great knot, Calidris tenuirostris (Horsfeld, 1821); surfbird, C. virgata (Gmelin, 1789); and red knot, C. canutus (Linnaeus 1758). Calls diverged unevenly across species, but RRCs and Song diverged most and ATs least. Vocalizations of great knot and surfbird were most similar to one another, in agreement with a recently proposed phylogeny. Despite species differences in single acoustic traits, calls were evolutionarily conservative at higher structural levels, such as rhythmic temporal delivery of RRCs and harmonic structure (e.g., the fundamental frequency was commonly suppressed). Some acoustic qualities that differed across species were similar across call types within species (e.g., tonality in red knot calls). Trait similarity across different calls suggests that a species’ calls cannot evolve independently of one another: common mechanisms of vocal production across different calls may impede differentiation within a species’ repertoire.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Zoology
Canadian Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1929, the Canadian Journal of Zoology is a monthly journal that reports on primary research contributed by respected international scientists in the broad field of zoology, including behaviour, biochemistry and physiology, developmental biology, ecology, genetics, morphology and ultrastructure, parasitology and pathology, and systematics and evolution. It also invites experts to submit review articles on topics of current interest.
期刊最新文献
Variation in body condition of moose calves in regions with contrasted winter conditions and tick loads Estimating the effects of roads on migration: a barren-ground caribou case study OVER-WINTER BODY MASS AND CONCEPTIONS OF WHITE-TAILED DEER IN CENTRAL TX SIGNALLING PATHWAY ASSOCIATED TO DISCHARGE OF CNIDOCYST INDUCED BY REDUCED GLUTATHIONE IN HYDRA PLAGIODESMICA (DIONI) Spatial patterns of anticoagulant rodenticides in three species of medium-sized carnivores in Pennsylvania
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1