E. Massoud, L. Andrews, R. Reichle, A. Molod, Jongmin Park, S. Ruehr, M. Girotto
{"title":"戈达德地球观测系统中亚洲高山地区的季节预报技巧","authors":"E. Massoud, L. Andrews, R. Reichle, A. Molod, Jongmin Park, S. Ruehr, M. Girotto","doi":"10.5194/esd-14-147-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Seasonal variability of the global hydrologic cycle\ndirectly impacts human activities, including hazard assessment and\nmitigation, agricultural decisions, and water resources management. This is\nparticularly true across the High Mountain Asia (HMA) region, where\navailability of water resources can change depending on local seasonality of\nthe hydrologic cycle. Forecasting the atmospheric states and surface\nconditions, including hydrometeorologically relevant variables, at\nsubseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) lead times of weeks to months is an area of\nactive research and development. NASA's Goddard Earth Observing System\n(GEOS) S2S prediction system has been developed with this research goal in\nmind. Here, we benchmark the forecast skill of GEOS-S2S (version 2)\nhydrometeorological forecasts at 1–3-month lead times in the HMA region,\nincluding a portion of the Indian subcontinent, during the retrospective\nforecast period, 1981–2016. To assess forecast skill, we evaluate 2 m air\ntemperature, total precipitation, fractional snow cover, snow water\nequivalent, surface soil moisture, and terrestrial water storage forecasts\nagainst the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications,\nVersion 2 (MERRA-2) and independent reanalysis data, satellite observations,\nand data fusion products. Anomaly correlation is highest when the forecasts\nare evaluated against MERRA-2 and particularly in variables with long memory\nin the climate system, likely due to the similar initial conditions and model\narchitecture used in GEOS-S2S and MERRA-2. When compared to MERRA-2, results\nfor the 1-month forecast skill range from an anomaly correlation of\nRanom=0.18 for precipitation to Ranom=0.62 for soil moisture.\nAnomaly correlations are consistently lower when forecasts are evaluated\nagainst independent observations; results for the 1-month forecast skill\nrange from Ranom=0.13 for snow water equivalent to Ranom=0.24\nfor fractional snow cover. We find that, generally, hydrometeorological\nforecast skill is dependent on the forecast lead time, the memory of the\nvariable within the physical system, and the validation dataset used.\nOverall, these results benchmark the GEOS-S2S system's ability to forecast\nHMA hydrometeorology.\n","PeriodicalId":92775,"journal":{"name":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seasonal forecasting skill for the High Mountain Asia region in the Goddard Earth Observing System\",\"authors\":\"E. Massoud, L. Andrews, R. Reichle, A. Molod, Jongmin Park, S. Ruehr, M. Girotto\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/esd-14-147-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Seasonal variability of the global hydrologic cycle\\ndirectly impacts human activities, including hazard assessment and\\nmitigation, agricultural decisions, and water resources management. This is\\nparticularly true across the High Mountain Asia (HMA) region, where\\navailability of water resources can change depending on local seasonality of\\nthe hydrologic cycle. Forecasting the atmospheric states and surface\\nconditions, including hydrometeorologically relevant variables, at\\nsubseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) lead times of weeks to months is an area of\\nactive research and development. NASA's Goddard Earth Observing System\\n(GEOS) S2S prediction system has been developed with this research goal in\\nmind. Here, we benchmark the forecast skill of GEOS-S2S (version 2)\\nhydrometeorological forecasts at 1–3-month lead times in the HMA region,\\nincluding a portion of the Indian subcontinent, during the retrospective\\nforecast period, 1981–2016. To assess forecast skill, we evaluate 2 m air\\ntemperature, total precipitation, fractional snow cover, snow water\\nequivalent, surface soil moisture, and terrestrial water storage forecasts\\nagainst the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications,\\nVersion 2 (MERRA-2) and independent reanalysis data, satellite observations,\\nand data fusion products. Anomaly correlation is highest when the forecasts\\nare evaluated against MERRA-2 and particularly in variables with long memory\\nin the climate system, likely due to the similar initial conditions and model\\narchitecture used in GEOS-S2S and MERRA-2. When compared to MERRA-2, results\\nfor the 1-month forecast skill range from an anomaly correlation of\\nRanom=0.18 for precipitation to Ranom=0.62 for soil moisture.\\nAnomaly correlations are consistently lower when forecasts are evaluated\\nagainst independent observations; results for the 1-month forecast skill\\nrange from Ranom=0.13 for snow water equivalent to Ranom=0.24\\nfor fractional snow cover. We find that, generally, hydrometeorological\\nforecast skill is dependent on the forecast lead time, the memory of the\\nvariable within the physical system, and the validation dataset used.\\nOverall, these results benchmark the GEOS-S2S system's ability to forecast\\nHMA hydrometeorology.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":92775,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth system dynamics : ESD\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth system dynamics : ESD\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-147-2023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth system dynamics : ESD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-147-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Seasonal forecasting skill for the High Mountain Asia region in the Goddard Earth Observing System
Abstract. Seasonal variability of the global hydrologic cycle
directly impacts human activities, including hazard assessment and
mitigation, agricultural decisions, and water resources management. This is
particularly true across the High Mountain Asia (HMA) region, where
availability of water resources can change depending on local seasonality of
the hydrologic cycle. Forecasting the atmospheric states and surface
conditions, including hydrometeorologically relevant variables, at
subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) lead times of weeks to months is an area of
active research and development. NASA's Goddard Earth Observing System
(GEOS) S2S prediction system has been developed with this research goal in
mind. Here, we benchmark the forecast skill of GEOS-S2S (version 2)
hydrometeorological forecasts at 1–3-month lead times in the HMA region,
including a portion of the Indian subcontinent, during the retrospective
forecast period, 1981–2016. To assess forecast skill, we evaluate 2 m air
temperature, total precipitation, fractional snow cover, snow water
equivalent, surface soil moisture, and terrestrial water storage forecasts
against the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications,
Version 2 (MERRA-2) and independent reanalysis data, satellite observations,
and data fusion products. Anomaly correlation is highest when the forecasts
are evaluated against MERRA-2 and particularly in variables with long memory
in the climate system, likely due to the similar initial conditions and model
architecture used in GEOS-S2S and MERRA-2. When compared to MERRA-2, results
for the 1-month forecast skill range from an anomaly correlation of
Ranom=0.18 for precipitation to Ranom=0.62 for soil moisture.
Anomaly correlations are consistently lower when forecasts are evaluated
against independent observations; results for the 1-month forecast skill
range from Ranom=0.13 for snow water equivalent to Ranom=0.24
for fractional snow cover. We find that, generally, hydrometeorological
forecast skill is dependent on the forecast lead time, the memory of the
variable within the physical system, and the validation dataset used.
Overall, these results benchmark the GEOS-S2S system's ability to forecast
HMA hydrometeorology.