进展,印刷,和“政治管理者”:执行继承詹姆斯二世和七世,1679-1682

Q3 Arts and Humanities Royal Studies Journal Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI:10.21039/RSJ.289
L. Doak
{"title":"进展,印刷,和“政治管理者”:执行继承詹姆斯二世和七世,1679-1682","authors":"L. Doak","doi":"10.21039/RSJ.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the Scottish progresses undertaken during 1679-1682 by the future James II of England and VII of Scotland. At this time, James was heir presumptive to his elder brother Charles II but, as a Catholic, his likely succession was controversial and triggered what is commonly called the Exclusion Crisis. Building on existing work that has studied how James used progresses to negotiate key support in Scotland, this article views these political performances within a broader, trans-archipelagic context and asks how they affected the crown’s ability to extricate itself from this controversy. Using archival and primary material, and paying particular attention to the poems, addresses, and other scripts they incorporate, the first section of this article focuses on ways in which these progresses were staged for multiple audiences. The second part concentrates on their subsequent representation in print as a means to examine the contest that surrounded James’s succession. Drawing together these threads of print and performance, this article shows that James’s Scottish progresses offer insightful case studies for the continued significance of monarchic performance in the premodern world. It demonstrates their profound impact on discourse, debate and, ultimately, the monarchy’s successful political management of this crisis.","PeriodicalId":36175,"journal":{"name":"Royal Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progresses, Print, and “Politick Managers”: Performing the Succession of James II & VII, 1679-1682\",\"authors\":\"L. Doak\",\"doi\":\"10.21039/RSJ.289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the Scottish progresses undertaken during 1679-1682 by the future James II of England and VII of Scotland. At this time, James was heir presumptive to his elder brother Charles II but, as a Catholic, his likely succession was controversial and triggered what is commonly called the Exclusion Crisis. Building on existing work that has studied how James used progresses to negotiate key support in Scotland, this article views these political performances within a broader, trans-archipelagic context and asks how they affected the crown’s ability to extricate itself from this controversy. Using archival and primary material, and paying particular attention to the poems, addresses, and other scripts they incorporate, the first section of this article focuses on ways in which these progresses were staged for multiple audiences. The second part concentrates on their subsequent representation in print as a means to examine the contest that surrounded James’s succession. Drawing together these threads of print and performance, this article shows that James’s Scottish progresses offer insightful case studies for the continued significance of monarchic performance in the premodern world. It demonstrates their profound impact on discourse, debate and, ultimately, the monarchy’s successful political management of this crisis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Royal Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Royal Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21039/RSJ.289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21039/RSJ.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了1679-1682年间,未来的英格兰詹姆斯二世和苏格兰七世在苏格兰取得的进步。当时,詹姆斯是哥哥查理二世的推定继承人,但作为一名天主教徒,他可能的继承权存在争议,并引发了通常所说的排斥危机。在研究詹姆斯如何利用进展在苏格兰谈判关键支持的现有工作的基础上,本文从更广泛的跨群岛背景下看待这些政治表现,并询问它们如何影响王室摆脱这场争议的能力。本文的第一部分使用档案和原始材料,并特别关注它们所包含的诗歌、地址和其他脚本,重点介绍了这些进展如何为多个观众上演。第二部分集中于他们随后在印刷品中的表现,以此来审视围绕詹姆斯继任的竞争。本文将这些印刷品和表演的线索结合在一起,表明詹姆斯在苏格兰的进步为君主表演在前现代世界的持续意义提供了富有洞察力的案例研究。这表明了他们对话语、辩论以及最终君主制对这场危机的成功政治管理的深刻影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Progresses, Print, and “Politick Managers”: Performing the Succession of James II & VII, 1679-1682
This article considers the Scottish progresses undertaken during 1679-1682 by the future James II of England and VII of Scotland. At this time, James was heir presumptive to his elder brother Charles II but, as a Catholic, his likely succession was controversial and triggered what is commonly called the Exclusion Crisis. Building on existing work that has studied how James used progresses to negotiate key support in Scotland, this article views these political performances within a broader, trans-archipelagic context and asks how they affected the crown’s ability to extricate itself from this controversy. Using archival and primary material, and paying particular attention to the poems, addresses, and other scripts they incorporate, the first section of this article focuses on ways in which these progresses were staged for multiple audiences. The second part concentrates on their subsequent representation in print as a means to examine the contest that surrounded James’s succession. Drawing together these threads of print and performance, this article shows that James’s Scottish progresses offer insightful case studies for the continued significance of monarchic performance in the premodern world. It demonstrates their profound impact on discourse, debate and, ultimately, the monarchy’s successful political management of this crisis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Royal Studies Journal
Royal Studies Journal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rohr and Benz, Queenship and the Women of Westeros. Female Agency and Advice in Game of Thrones and A Song of Ice and Fire (Palgrave MacMillan, 2020) Saint King Oswald of Northumbria: Overlord or Imperator? A Very Peculiar Ancestor Murray, Baldwin of Bourcq: Count of Edessa and King of Jerusalem (1100-1131), (Routledge, 2021) Royalty, Celebrity, and the Press in Georgian Britain, 1770-1820 Peebles and Scarlatta (eds.), Representing the Life and Legacy of Renée de France: From Fille de France to Dowager Duchess (Palgrave Macmillan, 2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1