科学与哲学的关系及其在当代全球政治中的作用的分析回顾

IF 0.6 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Science and innovation Pub Date : 2023-08-03 DOI:10.15407/scine19.04.030
Nsama Jonathan Simuziya, Abebe Tigire Jalu
{"title":"科学与哲学的关系及其在当代全球政治中的作用的分析回顾","authors":"Nsama Jonathan Simuziya, Abebe Tigire Jalu","doi":"10.15407/scine19.04.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The central argument of this study is that for science to meet the challenges of globalization and justice in the 21st century, it needs to be ethically informed, and thus philosophical reflection on and in science is cardinal.Problem Statement. The study focuses on the 21st century trends in philosophical thoughts that influence scientific motivations. To this effect, the research question that the study sought to answer is, ‘How and to what extent can philosophy be valuable/influential to scientific advancements in contemporary times?’Purpose. This paper aims to demonstrate that despite some differences between science and philosophy in their origin and methodological conceptions, they do have reciprocal rudiments. The study gleaned this relationship with the view to assess the utility of their relationship in a technologically and fast-paced 21st Century. This study contributes to the literature by providing theoretical perspectives that critique conventional (Western) epistemic stances of scientific knowledge construction and highlights lessons to be learnt through a juxtaposed pool of ideas from all regions of the globe, not just from the West.Material and Methods. The methodology adopted for this study leans on a descriptive and thematic literature approach which builds on qualitative data gathered through academic journals, scholarly books, and online publications. The study review endeavors to focus on the 21st century trends in philosophical thoughts that influence scientific motivations.Results. The study notes that the relationship between science and philosophy has endured for many hundreds of years, and despite their differences which mainly lie in their scope, attitudes, methods, and peculiar challenges, both are keenly engaged in advancing increased human capacity for innovation, ingenuity, and critical thinking. The study concludes — from the prism of the future — that a critical global appraisal and continuous rigorous review of scientific and philosophical activities is essential today more than ever before, if the futures project is to contri bute effectively to the (re)construction of sustainable frameworks of scientific production that yield results in an equitable and environmentally sustainable manner.\nConclusions. The study has brought to the fore, a stark reminder that neither science nor philosophy — operating singularly — offers genuine solutions on sustainable growth and development; hence stakeholders can make sense of complex phenomenon from both science and philosophy by critically reviewing their outcomes in a reciprocal manner that appreciates the advances, thegaps, and excesses from both sides. Most significantly, the study has pushed the envelope of comprehending science and philosophy beyond Western constructions that often tend to overlook, and in some cases purposely downgrade orthodox but otherwise valuable scientific insights from subaltern constellations of the global South.","PeriodicalId":21478,"journal":{"name":"Science and innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY & THEIR UTILITY IN CONTEMPORARY GLOBAL POLITY CONCEPTUALIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY\",\"authors\":\"Nsama Jonathan Simuziya, Abebe Tigire Jalu\",\"doi\":\"10.15407/scine19.04.030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The central argument of this study is that for science to meet the challenges of globalization and justice in the 21st century, it needs to be ethically informed, and thus philosophical reflection on and in science is cardinal.Problem Statement. The study focuses on the 21st century trends in philosophical thoughts that influence scientific motivations. To this effect, the research question that the study sought to answer is, ‘How and to what extent can philosophy be valuable/influential to scientific advancements in contemporary times?’Purpose. This paper aims to demonstrate that despite some differences between science and philosophy in their origin and methodological conceptions, they do have reciprocal rudiments. The study gleaned this relationship with the view to assess the utility of their relationship in a technologically and fast-paced 21st Century. This study contributes to the literature by providing theoretical perspectives that critique conventional (Western) epistemic stances of scientific knowledge construction and highlights lessons to be learnt through a juxtaposed pool of ideas from all regions of the globe, not just from the West.Material and Methods. The methodology adopted for this study leans on a descriptive and thematic literature approach which builds on qualitative data gathered through academic journals, scholarly books, and online publications. The study review endeavors to focus on the 21st century trends in philosophical thoughts that influence scientific motivations.Results. The study notes that the relationship between science and philosophy has endured for many hundreds of years, and despite their differences which mainly lie in their scope, attitudes, methods, and peculiar challenges, both are keenly engaged in advancing increased human capacity for innovation, ingenuity, and critical thinking. The study concludes — from the prism of the future — that a critical global appraisal and continuous rigorous review of scientific and philosophical activities is essential today more than ever before, if the futures project is to contri bute effectively to the (re)construction of sustainable frameworks of scientific production that yield results in an equitable and environmentally sustainable manner.\\nConclusions. The study has brought to the fore, a stark reminder that neither science nor philosophy — operating singularly — offers genuine solutions on sustainable growth and development; hence stakeholders can make sense of complex phenomenon from both science and philosophy by critically reviewing their outcomes in a reciprocal manner that appreciates the advances, thegaps, and excesses from both sides. Most significantly, the study has pushed the envelope of comprehending science and philosophy beyond Western constructions that often tend to overlook, and in some cases purposely downgrade orthodox but otherwise valuable scientific insights from subaltern constellations of the global South.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science and innovation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science and innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15407/scine19.04.030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science and innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/scine19.04.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。本研究的核心论点是,科学要应对21世纪全球化和正义的挑战,就需要有伦理知识,因此对科学的哲学反思是至关重要的。问题陈述。这项研究的重点是21世纪影响科学动机的哲学思想趋势。为此,本研究试图回答的研究问题是,“哲学如何以及在多大程度上对当代科学进步有价值/有影响?”本文旨在证明,尽管科学与哲学在起源和方法论概念上存在一些差异,但它们确实具有相互的基础。这项研究收集了这种关系,目的是评估他们的关系在科技和快节奏的21世纪的效用。本研究通过提供批判传统(西方)科学知识建构的认知立场的理论视角,并通过来自全球所有地区(而不仅仅是西方)的并列思想池,突出了需要学习的经验教训,从而为文献做出了贡献。材料和方法。本研究采用的方法依赖于描述性和专题文献方法,该方法建立在通过学术期刊、学术书籍和在线出版物收集的定性数据之上。本研究试图关注21世纪影响科学动机的哲学思想趋势。该研究指出,科学与哲学之间的关系已经持续了数百年,尽管它们的差异主要在于它们的范围、态度、方法和特殊的挑战,但两者都敏锐地致力于提高人类的创新能力、独创性和批判性思维。该研究从未来的角度得出结论,如果未来项目要有效地促进科学生产的可持续框架的(重新)建设,以公平和环境可持续的方式产生结果,那么对科学和哲学活动进行批判性的全球评估和持续的严格审查比以往任何时候都更加重要。这项研究清楚地提醒我们,科学和哲学都不能为可持续增长和发展提供真正的解决方案。因此,利益相关者可以从科学和哲学中理解复杂的现象,通过以一种互惠的方式批判性地审查它们的结果,欣赏双方的进步、差距和过度。最重要的是,这项研究将理解科学和哲学的极限推到了西方建筑之外,这些建筑往往往往被忽视,在某些情况下,故意贬低来自全球南方次等星座的正统但在其他方面有价值的科学见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AN ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SCIENCE AND PHILOSOPHY & THEIR UTILITY IN CONTEMPORARY GLOBAL POLITY CONCEPTUALIZATION OF TECHNOLOGY
Introduction. The central argument of this study is that for science to meet the challenges of globalization and justice in the 21st century, it needs to be ethically informed, and thus philosophical reflection on and in science is cardinal.Problem Statement. The study focuses on the 21st century trends in philosophical thoughts that influence scientific motivations. To this effect, the research question that the study sought to answer is, ‘How and to what extent can philosophy be valuable/influential to scientific advancements in contemporary times?’Purpose. This paper aims to demonstrate that despite some differences between science and philosophy in their origin and methodological conceptions, they do have reciprocal rudiments. The study gleaned this relationship with the view to assess the utility of their relationship in a technologically and fast-paced 21st Century. This study contributes to the literature by providing theoretical perspectives that critique conventional (Western) epistemic stances of scientific knowledge construction and highlights lessons to be learnt through a juxtaposed pool of ideas from all regions of the globe, not just from the West.Material and Methods. The methodology adopted for this study leans on a descriptive and thematic literature approach which builds on qualitative data gathered through academic journals, scholarly books, and online publications. The study review endeavors to focus on the 21st century trends in philosophical thoughts that influence scientific motivations.Results. The study notes that the relationship between science and philosophy has endured for many hundreds of years, and despite their differences which mainly lie in their scope, attitudes, methods, and peculiar challenges, both are keenly engaged in advancing increased human capacity for innovation, ingenuity, and critical thinking. The study concludes — from the prism of the future — that a critical global appraisal and continuous rigorous review of scientific and philosophical activities is essential today more than ever before, if the futures project is to contri bute effectively to the (re)construction of sustainable frameworks of scientific production that yield results in an equitable and environmentally sustainable manner. Conclusions. The study has brought to the fore, a stark reminder that neither science nor philosophy — operating singularly — offers genuine solutions on sustainable growth and development; hence stakeholders can make sense of complex phenomenon from both science and philosophy by critically reviewing their outcomes in a reciprocal manner that appreciates the advances, thegaps, and excesses from both sides. Most significantly, the study has pushed the envelope of comprehending science and philosophy beyond Western constructions that often tend to overlook, and in some cases purposely downgrade orthodox but otherwise valuable scientific insights from subaltern constellations of the global South.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science and innovation
Science and innovation MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
The Interaction of the Punch Toroidal Surface with the Eyelet During Grommeting Textile Materials Nanocellulose-Based Resistive Sensors for Air Humidity Measurements ВПЛИВ СТИМУЛЯТОРІВ РОСТУ МІКРОБНОГО ПОХОДЖЕННЯ НА РОЗВИТОК ВЕРМИКУЛЬТУРИ ІНФОРМАЦІЙНЕ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ЦІННІСНО-ЗОРІЄНТОВАНОГО УПРАВЛІННЯ НАФТОГАЗОВИДОБУВНИМИ ПІДПРИЄМСТВАМИ ОЦІНКА ПАЛИВНОЇ БЕЗПЕКИ КРАЇН У ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКОМУ ПРОСТОРІ ТА ЗАГРОЗИ ПОТРАПЛЯННЯ УКРАЇНИ У ПАСТКУ ПАЛИВНОЇ ЗАЛЕЖНОСТІ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1