殖民想象之外的人权:法律授权和剥夺合法性的技巧

IF 0.9 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Journal of Human Rights Practice Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1093/jhuman/huad012
Emese Ilyés, Melania Chiponda, Sukti Dhital, Margaret L. Satterthwaite, Aakanksha Badkur, Antonio Gutiérrez, Bethany A. Carson, Dyari Mustafa, Felipe Mesel, F. Feruglio, Noor Mushin, Poorvi Chitalkar, Shreyashi Sen, Tim Kakuru, Tom Weerachat, Tyler Walton
{"title":"殖民想象之外的人权:法律授权和剥夺合法性的技巧","authors":"Emese Ilyés, Melania Chiponda, Sukti Dhital, Margaret L. Satterthwaite, Aakanksha Badkur, Antonio Gutiérrez, Bethany A. Carson, Dyari Mustafa, Felipe Mesel, F. Feruglio, Noor Mushin, Poorvi Chitalkar, Shreyashi Sen, Tim Kakuru, Tom Weerachat, Tyler Walton","doi":"10.1093/jhuman/huad012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Community-based and participatory methods are often marginalized within institutions of power. In this article, we—a group of community advocates, lawyers, scholars, and researchers from across the globe including Thailand, India, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Italy, Iraq, Argentina, the UK, Puerto Rico, and the United States—have collectively gathered ways that community based, participatory legal empowerment research has been delegitimized across these contexts, and offer practical strategies to break out of this white supremacist colonial imagination and interrupt and respond to these instances of silencing and erasure. Our gatherings enable us to bring to life the rich particulars of each of our unique contexts and through this richness begin to see how larger dynamics span the globe. The micro illuminates the mechanics of the macro. This critical analysis that is possible in such a participatory space allowed us to identify these strategies of delegitimation that we were experiencing despite our very different positionalities and histories. These techniques of delegitimation fall into three broad themes: using traditional research as defence, attacking the credibility of communities including denying their humanity, and acts of self-invalidation. These techniques, whether enacted by donors, companies, government agencies, or academic institutions, seek to disempower the lived experiences of community members involved in legal empowerment. By cataloguing these experiences we hope to better understand techniques of silencing and oppression, and to trace the ways that systems of power reinforce their standing through these immediate and interpersonal responses to the voice of the collective.","PeriodicalId":45407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Rights Beyond the Colonial Imagination: Legal Empowerment and Techniques of Delegitimation\",\"authors\":\"Emese Ilyés, Melania Chiponda, Sukti Dhital, Margaret L. Satterthwaite, Aakanksha Badkur, Antonio Gutiérrez, Bethany A. Carson, Dyari Mustafa, Felipe Mesel, F. Feruglio, Noor Mushin, Poorvi Chitalkar, Shreyashi Sen, Tim Kakuru, Tom Weerachat, Tyler Walton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jhuman/huad012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Community-based and participatory methods are often marginalized within institutions of power. In this article, we—a group of community advocates, lawyers, scholars, and researchers from across the globe including Thailand, India, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Italy, Iraq, Argentina, the UK, Puerto Rico, and the United States—have collectively gathered ways that community based, participatory legal empowerment research has been delegitimized across these contexts, and offer practical strategies to break out of this white supremacist colonial imagination and interrupt and respond to these instances of silencing and erasure. Our gatherings enable us to bring to life the rich particulars of each of our unique contexts and through this richness begin to see how larger dynamics span the globe. The micro illuminates the mechanics of the macro. This critical analysis that is possible in such a participatory space allowed us to identify these strategies of delegitimation that we were experiencing despite our very different positionalities and histories. These techniques of delegitimation fall into three broad themes: using traditional research as defence, attacking the credibility of communities including denying their humanity, and acts of self-invalidation. These techniques, whether enacted by donors, companies, government agencies, or academic institutions, seek to disempower the lived experiences of community members involved in legal empowerment. By cataloguing these experiences we hope to better understand techniques of silencing and oppression, and to trace the ways that systems of power reinforce their standing through these immediate and interpersonal responses to the voice of the collective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Rights Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Rights Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Rights Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huad012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以社区为基础的参与性方法往往在权力机构中被边缘化。在本文中,我们——一群来自世界各地的社区倡导者、律师、学者和研究人员,包括泰国、印度、乌干达、津巴布韦、意大利、伊拉克、阿根廷、英国、波多黎各和美国——共同收集了基于社区的、参与式法律赋权研究在这些背景下被非法化的方法。并提供实用的策略来打破这种白人至上主义的殖民想象,打断并回应这些沉默和抹去的例子。我们的聚会使我们能够将每个独特环境的丰富细节带入生活,并通过这种丰富性开始看到更大的动态跨越全球。微观阐明了宏观的机制。这种在这样一个参与性空间中可能进行的批判性分析使我们能够确定我们正在经历的这些非法化战略,尽管我们的立场和历史非常不同。这些剥夺合法性的技术分为三个主要主题:利用传统研究作为辩护,攻击社区的可信度,包括否认其人性,以及自我无效的行为。这些技术,无论是由捐助者、公司、政府机构还是学术机构制定的,都试图剥夺参与法律授权的社区成员的生活经历。通过对这些经历进行编目,我们希望更好地理解沉默和压迫的技巧,并追踪权力系统如何通过对集体声音的直接和人际反应来加强其地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human Rights Beyond the Colonial Imagination: Legal Empowerment and Techniques of Delegitimation
Community-based and participatory methods are often marginalized within institutions of power. In this article, we—a group of community advocates, lawyers, scholars, and researchers from across the globe including Thailand, India, Uganda, Zimbabwe, Italy, Iraq, Argentina, the UK, Puerto Rico, and the United States—have collectively gathered ways that community based, participatory legal empowerment research has been delegitimized across these contexts, and offer practical strategies to break out of this white supremacist colonial imagination and interrupt and respond to these instances of silencing and erasure. Our gatherings enable us to bring to life the rich particulars of each of our unique contexts and through this richness begin to see how larger dynamics span the globe. The micro illuminates the mechanics of the macro. This critical analysis that is possible in such a participatory space allowed us to identify these strategies of delegitimation that we were experiencing despite our very different positionalities and histories. These techniques of delegitimation fall into three broad themes: using traditional research as defence, attacking the credibility of communities including denying their humanity, and acts of self-invalidation. These techniques, whether enacted by donors, companies, government agencies, or academic institutions, seek to disempower the lived experiences of community members involved in legal empowerment. By cataloguing these experiences we hope to better understand techniques of silencing and oppression, and to trace the ways that systems of power reinforce their standing through these immediate and interpersonal responses to the voice of the collective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
80
期刊最新文献
Administrative Lawfare at the European Union’s External Borders: Some Perspectives on Administrative Regulation of NGO Search and Rescue Activities in Italy and the Situation at the Polish-Belarusian Border Specificity in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights A Jurisdictional Vertigo: Compulsory Arbitration, Sports and the European Court of Human Rights Forced Marriages in Times of Armed Conflict: An Implicit Paradox of Modern Slavery under International Humanitarian Law The Politics of Ambiguous Loss: Missing Persons and Social Ecologies after Armed Conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1