公共部门的可持续性和问责制:合法性视角

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Social and Environmental Accountability Journal Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1080/0969160X.2022.2136907
Xinwu He
{"title":"公共部门的可持续性和问责制:合法性视角","authors":"Xinwu He","doi":"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2136907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most nations, the public sector (in contrast to private and third sectors) has an enormous impact on the economy, society, and environment (CIPFA, 2021). It is widely acknowledged that public sector organisations (PSOs) have the responsibility and potential to advance sustainable development given the dual role of the public sector (as both a public service provider and a regulator) and the urgency of global environmental and social challenges. The landscape of sustainability integration, performance management, and disclosure in the public sector has attracted the attention of academics, policymakers, and practitioners worldwide, in recognising that PSOs need to be publicly accountable to a wide range of stakeholders. Moreover, legitimacy theory has long been applied within the sustainability and accountability literature to explain organisations’ motivations for sustainability strategies and accountability disclosures. Legitimacy is viewed as a resource necessary to the survival of an organisation (Deegan, 2014), which generates pressures regarding expected organisational behaviour (Connolly and Kelly, 2020). Further, this","PeriodicalId":38053,"journal":{"name":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability and Accountability in Public Sector: A Legitimacy Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Xinwu He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0969160X.2022.2136907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most nations, the public sector (in contrast to private and third sectors) has an enormous impact on the economy, society, and environment (CIPFA, 2021). It is widely acknowledged that public sector organisations (PSOs) have the responsibility and potential to advance sustainable development given the dual role of the public sector (as both a public service provider and a regulator) and the urgency of global environmental and social challenges. The landscape of sustainability integration, performance management, and disclosure in the public sector has attracted the attention of academics, policymakers, and practitioners worldwide, in recognising that PSOs need to be publicly accountable to a wide range of stakeholders. Moreover, legitimacy theory has long been applied within the sustainability and accountability literature to explain organisations’ motivations for sustainability strategies and accountability disclosures. Legitimacy is viewed as a resource necessary to the survival of an organisation (Deegan, 2014), which generates pressures regarding expected organisational behaviour (Connolly and Kelly, 2020). Further, this\",\"PeriodicalId\":38053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2136907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social and Environmental Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2022.2136907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对大多数国家来说,公共部门(与私营部门和第三部门相比)对经济、社会和环境有着巨大的影响(CIPFA,2021)。鉴于公共部门(既是公共服务提供者又是监管机构)的双重作用以及全球环境和社会挑战的紧迫性,人们普遍认为,公共部门组织有责任和潜力推动可持续发展。公共部门的可持续性整合、绩效管理和信息披露引起了世界各地学者、政策制定者和从业者的注意,他们认识到公共部门运营商需要对广泛的利益相关者公开负责。此外,合法性理论长期以来一直被应用于可持续性和问责制文献中,以解释组织实施可持续性战略和问责制披露的动机。合法性被视为组织生存所必需的资源(Deegan,2014),这会对预期的组织行为产生压力(Connolly和Kelly,2020)。此外
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sustainability and Accountability in Public Sector: A Legitimacy Perspective
For most nations, the public sector (in contrast to private and third sectors) has an enormous impact on the economy, society, and environment (CIPFA, 2021). It is widely acknowledged that public sector organisations (PSOs) have the responsibility and potential to advance sustainable development given the dual role of the public sector (as both a public service provider and a regulator) and the urgency of global environmental and social challenges. The landscape of sustainability integration, performance management, and disclosure in the public sector has attracted the attention of academics, policymakers, and practitioners worldwide, in recognising that PSOs need to be publicly accountable to a wide range of stakeholders. Moreover, legitimacy theory has long been applied within the sustainability and accountability literature to explain organisations’ motivations for sustainability strategies and accountability disclosures. Legitimacy is viewed as a resource necessary to the survival of an organisation (Deegan, 2014), which generates pressures regarding expected organisational behaviour (Connolly and Kelly, 2020). Further, this
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal
Social and Environmental Accountability Journal Business, Management and Accounting-Accounting
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Social and Environmental Accountability Journal (SEAJ) is the official Journal of The Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research. It is a predominantly refereed Journal committed to the creation of a new academic literature in the broad field of social, environmental and sustainable development accounting, accountability, reporting and auditing. The Journal provides a forum for a wide range of different forms of academic and academic-related communications whose aim is to balance honesty and scholarly rigour with directness, clarity, policy-relevance and novelty. SEAJ welcomes all contributions that fulfil the criteria of the journal, including empirical papers, review papers and essays, manuscripts reporting or proposing engagement, commentaries and polemics, and reviews of articles or books. A key feature of SEAJ is that papers are shorter than the word length typically anticipated in academic journals in the social sciences. A clearer breakdown of the proposed word length for each type of paper in SEAJ can be found here.
期刊最新文献
Cultural Circularities that Limit Diversity: Emancipating Voices Finding Our Voices – Exploring Diversity, Inclusion and Accounting by the Marginalised and Managed Diverse Queer Performance of Gay and Cis Men Accountants from the Perspective of Tokenism Moving Beyond the External Face of Accountability: Constructing Accountability for Sustainability from WithinFrostenson, M., & Johnstone, L. (2023). Moving beyond the external face of accountability: Constructing accountability for sustainability from within. Sustainability Accounting, Management an Is There No Sin Down South of the Equator? Brazilian Auditors’ Perception of the Gendered and Racialized Dynamics in Audit Firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1