2019 George Richardson讲座:Mary Mollineux的退休果实(1702):第二个桂派时期的诗歌

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Quaker Studies Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.3828/quaker.2020.25.2.2
H. Hinds
{"title":"2019 George Richardson讲座:Mary Mollineux的退休果实(1702):第二个桂派时期的诗歌","authors":"H. Hinds","doi":"10.3828/quaker.2020.25.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFruits of Retirement, a volume of poetry by the Lancashire Quaker Mary Mollineux, was published posthumously in 1702 by her husband and other Friends; it was well received and republished five times in the eighteenth century. Yet the early Quakers, like most Protestants of the time, rejected creative endeavour as impinging on the prerogative of the Almighty to create. This article considers why Mollineux’s poetry might have been so well received, notwithstanding Quaker strictures against the creative arts. It begins by reviewing the case against the arts, and argues for the importance of understanding the style, form and acceptance of Mollineux’s poetry in the light of the second period of Quakerism in which it was written and received.","PeriodicalId":36790,"journal":{"name":"Quaker Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"135-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2019 George Richardson Lecture: Mary Mollineux’s Fruits of Retirement (1702): Poetry in the Second Period of Quakerism\",\"authors\":\"H. Hinds\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/quaker.2020.25.2.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nFruits of Retirement, a volume of poetry by the Lancashire Quaker Mary Mollineux, was published posthumously in 1702 by her husband and other Friends; it was well received and republished five times in the eighteenth century. Yet the early Quakers, like most Protestants of the time, rejected creative endeavour as impinging on the prerogative of the Almighty to create. This article considers why Mollineux’s poetry might have been so well received, notwithstanding Quaker strictures against the creative arts. It begins by reviewing the case against the arts, and argues for the importance of understanding the style, form and acceptance of Mollineux’s poetry in the light of the second period of Quakerism in which it was written and received.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaker Studies\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"135-155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaker Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.2020.25.2.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaker Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/quaker.2020.25.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《退休的果实》是兰开夏教友会教徒玛丽·莫林纳的诗集,于1702年由她的丈夫和其他朋友在她死后出版。它很受欢迎,在十八世纪再版了五次。然而,早期的贵格会教徒,像当时的大多数新教徒一样,拒绝创造性的努力,认为这侵犯了全能者创造的特权。这篇文章探讨了为什么尽管贵格会对创造性艺术持批评态度,莫林纳的诗歌却可能如此受欢迎。它首先回顾了反对艺术的案例,并论证了理解莫莱纳诗歌的风格,形式和接受的重要性,根据贵格会的第二时期,莫莱纳的诗歌是在那个时期创作和接受的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019 George Richardson Lecture: Mary Mollineux’s Fruits of Retirement (1702): Poetry in the Second Period of Quakerism
Fruits of Retirement, a volume of poetry by the Lancashire Quaker Mary Mollineux, was published posthumously in 1702 by her husband and other Friends; it was well received and republished five times in the eighteenth century. Yet the early Quakers, like most Protestants of the time, rejected creative endeavour as impinging on the prerogative of the Almighty to create. This article considers why Mollineux’s poetry might have been so well received, notwithstanding Quaker strictures against the creative arts. It begins by reviewing the case against the arts, and argues for the importance of understanding the style, form and acceptance of Mollineux’s poetry in the light of the second period of Quakerism in which it was written and received.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaker Studies
Quaker Studies Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
John Woolman’s Intersecting Testimonies against Enslavement, Colonialism and the Rum Trade John Woolman and ‘The Meek Shall Inherit the Earth’ Selecting from the Writings of John Woolman: ‘On Christian Moderation’ The Seed and the Day of Small Things: Finding Power and Powerlessness in Quaker Theology John Woolman Special Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1