瑞士的语言地域性

IF 0.4 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Problems & Language Planning Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1075/lplp.00077.bur
Till Burckhardt
{"title":"瑞士的语言地域性","authors":"Till Burckhardt","doi":"10.1075/lplp.00077.bur","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article argues that the linguistic territoriality principle cannot be considered as a general guideline for the\n design of language policy but rather as a tool to find the right balance between linguistic freedom and linguistic peace under\n given circumstances. The article traces the origin and evolution of language policy principles during the drafting process of the\n new constitutional article in its three official language versions. The Swiss language regime is embedded in an institutional\n system of executive federalism in which mostly monolingual cantons and municipalities are in charge of implementing nearly all\n public policy. This significantly reduces the relevance of the inconsistency between a formally personalistic multilingual federal\n language regime and linguistic territoriality deriving from cantonal language regimes. The point of the new federal regulation is\n to provide room for manoeuvre for cantonal policymakers to adopt legislation based on linguistic territoriality. The relevant\n constitutional article recognises that territorial language policies can be implemented to ensure linguistic peace. At the same\n time, the personality principle may be adopted to protect autochthonous linguistic minorities.","PeriodicalId":44345,"journal":{"name":"Language Problems & Language Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linguistic territoriality in Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Till Burckhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lplp.00077.bur\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article argues that the linguistic territoriality principle cannot be considered as a general guideline for the\\n design of language policy but rather as a tool to find the right balance between linguistic freedom and linguistic peace under\\n given circumstances. The article traces the origin and evolution of language policy principles during the drafting process of the\\n new constitutional article in its three official language versions. The Swiss language regime is embedded in an institutional\\n system of executive federalism in which mostly monolingual cantons and municipalities are in charge of implementing nearly all\\n public policy. This significantly reduces the relevance of the inconsistency between a formally personalistic multilingual federal\\n language regime and linguistic territoriality deriving from cantonal language regimes. The point of the new federal regulation is\\n to provide room for manoeuvre for cantonal policymakers to adopt legislation based on linguistic territoriality. The relevant\\n constitutional article recognises that territorial language policies can be implemented to ensure linguistic peace. At the same\\n time, the personality principle may be adopted to protect autochthonous linguistic minorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Problems & Language Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00077.bur\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Problems & Language Planning","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.00077.bur","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,语言地域性原则不能作为语言政策设计的一般准则,而应作为在特定情况下寻找语言自由与语言和平之间适当平衡的工具。本文以三种正式语文版本追溯了新宪法条款起草过程中语言政策原则的起源和演变。瑞士的语言制度植根于一个行政联邦制的制度体系中,在这个体系中,大多数只说一种语言的州和市负责执行几乎所有的公共政策。这大大减少了形式上个人主义的多语言联邦语言制度与源自州语言制度的语言地域性之间不一致的相关性。新的联邦法规的重点是为各州决策者提供机动空间,以采用基于语言地域性的立法。有关的宪法条款承认,可以实施领土语言政策,以确保语言和平。同时,可以采用人格原则来保护母语少数民族。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linguistic territoriality in Switzerland
This article argues that the linguistic territoriality principle cannot be considered as a general guideline for the design of language policy but rather as a tool to find the right balance between linguistic freedom and linguistic peace under given circumstances. The article traces the origin and evolution of language policy principles during the drafting process of the new constitutional article in its three official language versions. The Swiss language regime is embedded in an institutional system of executive federalism in which mostly monolingual cantons and municipalities are in charge of implementing nearly all public policy. This significantly reduces the relevance of the inconsistency between a formally personalistic multilingual federal language regime and linguistic territoriality deriving from cantonal language regimes. The point of the new federal regulation is to provide room for manoeuvre for cantonal policymakers to adopt legislation based on linguistic territoriality. The relevant constitutional article recognises that territorial language policies can be implemented to ensure linguistic peace. At the same time, the personality principle may be adopted to protect autochthonous linguistic minorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Language Problems and Language Planning is published in cooperation with the Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems. This international multi-lingual journal publishes articles primarily on political, sociological, and economic aspects of language and language use. It is especially concerned with relationships between and among language communities, particularly in international contexts, and in the adaptation, manipulation, and standardization of language for international use.
期刊最新文献
Review of Salomone (2022): The rise of English: Global politics and the power of language Review of Wright & Higgins (2021): Diversifying Family Language Policy Review of Faingold (2020): Language Rights and the Law in the European Union Translation policies in times of a pandemic Review of Barandovská-Frank (2020): Interlingvistiko. Enkonduko en la sciencon pri planlingvoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1