{"title":"去现代主义者的中立意识形态","authors":"Shim Kwang-Hyun","doi":"10.1080/17561310.2022.2163085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Written as a response to Seo Seongrok’s criticism of Minjung misul and its theory of social realism, this article warns of the danger of postmodernism from the West, especially its call for deconstruction of subject and its denial of social totality. The author believes that such attitudes can result in anarchism, extreme individualism, and even nihilism. The author defends social realism by arguing that questions of forms, styles, and art medium remain secondary to the grand principle of the independent development of national art for the Minjung misul (people’s art) movement.","PeriodicalId":53629,"journal":{"name":"Art in Translation","volume":"14 1","pages":"392 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Neutral Ideology of De-Modernists\",\"authors\":\"Shim Kwang-Hyun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17561310.2022.2163085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Written as a response to Seo Seongrok’s criticism of Minjung misul and its theory of social realism, this article warns of the danger of postmodernism from the West, especially its call for deconstruction of subject and its denial of social totality. The author believes that such attitudes can result in anarchism, extreme individualism, and even nihilism. The author defends social realism by arguing that questions of forms, styles, and art medium remain secondary to the grand principle of the independent development of national art for the Minjung misul (people’s art) movement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art in Translation\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"392 - 397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art in Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2022.2163085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art in Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17561310.2022.2163085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Written as a response to Seo Seongrok’s criticism of Minjung misul and its theory of social realism, this article warns of the danger of postmodernism from the West, especially its call for deconstruction of subject and its denial of social totality. The author believes that such attitudes can result in anarchism, extreme individualism, and even nihilism. The author defends social realism by arguing that questions of forms, styles, and art medium remain secondary to the grand principle of the independent development of national art for the Minjung misul (people’s art) movement.