社会挑战和企业领导力促进社会创新

IF 3.1 Q2 BUSINESS Society and Business Review Pub Date : 2021-08-13 DOI:10.1108/sbr-10-2020-0129
Nicola M. Pless, Matthew Murphy, Thomas Maak, Atri Sengupta
{"title":"社会挑战和企业领导力促进社会创新","authors":"Nicola M. Pless, Matthew Murphy, Thomas Maak, Atri Sengupta","doi":"10.1108/sbr-10-2020-0129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nToday’s pressing global societal challenges are urgent and require substantial solutions and innovations that tackle the roots of a problem. These challenges call for new forms of leadership, stakeholder engagement and innovation. This paper aims to examine whether, why and how business leaders engage in social innovation. The authors argue that leadership perspective and motivation are important drivers for developing substantial social innovations suited to resolving societal challenges at their roots. More specifically, the authors propose that intra-personal factors (degree of care and compassion), an inter-relational perspective of leadership (shareholder versus stakeholder) and the corresponding leadership motivation (personalized versus socialized) may unveil what quality of social innovation (first-order versus second-order solutions) is pursued by a business leader. Implications for future research and practice are provided.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors revisit the concept of social innovation and explore its connection with care and compassion. They suggest a series of propositions pertaining to the relationship between different configurations of leadership and different forms of social innovation.\n\n\nFindings\nResponsible business leaders with an integrative leader trait configuration (stakeholder perspective, socialized motivation, high degree of care and compassion) are more likely to foster substantial second-order social innovations for uprooting societal problems than business leader with an instrumental leader trait configuration (shareholder perspective, personalized motivation, low degree of care and compassion). An organization’s stakeholder culture plays a moderating role in the relation between leadership and social innovation.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis paper reveals a path for conceptualizing leadership in social innovation from a stakeholder perspective. Future research should investigate the role of business leaders, their mindsets, styles and relational competencies in co-creation processes of social innovation empirically. If the development of substantial second-order social innovations requires leaders with a stakeholder perspective and socialized approach, then this has implications for leader selection and development.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper advocates for new kinds of leaders in facilitating and sustaining social innovations to tackle global societal challenges.\n","PeriodicalId":44608,"journal":{"name":"Society and Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Societal challenges and business leadership for social innovation\",\"authors\":\"Nicola M. Pless, Matthew Murphy, Thomas Maak, Atri Sengupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sbr-10-2020-0129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nToday’s pressing global societal challenges are urgent and require substantial solutions and innovations that tackle the roots of a problem. These challenges call for new forms of leadership, stakeholder engagement and innovation. This paper aims to examine whether, why and how business leaders engage in social innovation. The authors argue that leadership perspective and motivation are important drivers for developing substantial social innovations suited to resolving societal challenges at their roots. More specifically, the authors propose that intra-personal factors (degree of care and compassion), an inter-relational perspective of leadership (shareholder versus stakeholder) and the corresponding leadership motivation (personalized versus socialized) may unveil what quality of social innovation (first-order versus second-order solutions) is pursued by a business leader. Implications for future research and practice are provided.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe authors revisit the concept of social innovation and explore its connection with care and compassion. They suggest a series of propositions pertaining to the relationship between different configurations of leadership and different forms of social innovation.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResponsible business leaders with an integrative leader trait configuration (stakeholder perspective, socialized motivation, high degree of care and compassion) are more likely to foster substantial second-order social innovations for uprooting societal problems than business leader with an instrumental leader trait configuration (shareholder perspective, personalized motivation, low degree of care and compassion). An organization’s stakeholder culture plays a moderating role in the relation between leadership and social innovation.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis paper reveals a path for conceptualizing leadership in social innovation from a stakeholder perspective. Future research should investigate the role of business leaders, their mindsets, styles and relational competencies in co-creation processes of social innovation empirically. If the development of substantial second-order social innovations requires leaders with a stakeholder perspective and socialized approach, then this has implications for leader selection and development.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis paper advocates for new kinds of leaders in facilitating and sustaining social innovations to tackle global societal challenges.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society and Business Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society and Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2020-0129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society and Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-10-2020-0129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的当今紧迫的全球社会挑战迫在眉睫,需要解决问题根源的实质性解决方案和创新。这些挑战需要新形式的领导力、利益相关者的参与和创新。本文旨在考察企业领导者是否、为什么以及如何参与社会创新。作者认为,领导视角和动机是发展实质性社会创新的重要驱动力,这些创新适合从根源上解决社会挑战。更具体地说,作者提出,个人内部因素(关心和同情的程度)、领导的相互关系视角(股东与利益相关者)和相应的领导动机(个性化与社会化)可能揭示了企业领导者追求的社会创新质量(一阶与二阶解决方案)。对未来的研究和实践提供了启示。设计/方法论/方法作者重新审视了社会创新的概念,并探讨了它与关怀和同情的联系。他们提出了一系列关于不同领导结构和不同形式的社会创新之间关系的命题。发现具有综合领导者特质配置(利益相关者视角、社会化动机、高度关心和同情)的负责任的企业领导者比具有工具型领导者特质配置的企业领导者更有可能促进实质性的二阶社会创新,以根除社会问题(股东视角、个性化动机、关怀和同情程度低)。组织的利益相关者文化在领导力和社会创新之间的关系中起着调节作用。社会含义本文从利益相关者的角度揭示了社会创新中领导力概念化的途径。未来的研究应该实证研究商业领袖在社会创新共创过程中的作用、他们的心态、风格和关系能力。如果实质性的二阶社会创新的发展需要具有利益相关者视角和社会化方法的领导者,那么这对领导者的选择和发展具有影响。独创性/价值本文倡导新型领导者促进和维持社会创新,以应对全球社会挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Societal challenges and business leadership for social innovation
Purpose Today’s pressing global societal challenges are urgent and require substantial solutions and innovations that tackle the roots of a problem. These challenges call for new forms of leadership, stakeholder engagement and innovation. This paper aims to examine whether, why and how business leaders engage in social innovation. The authors argue that leadership perspective and motivation are important drivers for developing substantial social innovations suited to resolving societal challenges at their roots. More specifically, the authors propose that intra-personal factors (degree of care and compassion), an inter-relational perspective of leadership (shareholder versus stakeholder) and the corresponding leadership motivation (personalized versus socialized) may unveil what quality of social innovation (first-order versus second-order solutions) is pursued by a business leader. Implications for future research and practice are provided. Design/methodology/approach The authors revisit the concept of social innovation and explore its connection with care and compassion. They suggest a series of propositions pertaining to the relationship between different configurations of leadership and different forms of social innovation. Findings Responsible business leaders with an integrative leader trait configuration (stakeholder perspective, socialized motivation, high degree of care and compassion) are more likely to foster substantial second-order social innovations for uprooting societal problems than business leader with an instrumental leader trait configuration (shareholder perspective, personalized motivation, low degree of care and compassion). An organization’s stakeholder culture plays a moderating role in the relation between leadership and social innovation. Social implications This paper reveals a path for conceptualizing leadership in social innovation from a stakeholder perspective. Future research should investigate the role of business leaders, their mindsets, styles and relational competencies in co-creation processes of social innovation empirically. If the development of substantial second-order social innovations requires leaders with a stakeholder perspective and socialized approach, then this has implications for leader selection and development. Originality/value This paper advocates for new kinds of leaders in facilitating and sustaining social innovations to tackle global societal challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Environmental catastrophes and organizational ambidexterity: lessons from the Covid-19 experience Organizational stakeholders and environmental sustainability investment: does China’s regional heterogeneity matter? Religious-ethnic entrepreneurs planting seeds: a novel research agenda Bringing home the bacon: do politicians on boards increase firms’ government contracts? The effect of CEOs’ being the only children in the family on their CSR engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1