(重新)定位数字时代的扫盲doxa:新政策参与者的话语实践

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogy Culture and Society Pub Date : 2021-10-04 DOI:10.1080/14681366.2021.1983856
Alexander Bacalja
{"title":"(重新)定位数字时代的扫盲doxa:新政策参与者的话语实践","authors":"Alexander Bacalja","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2021.1983856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT deological struggles over the policy and practice of literacy education continue to characterise the field. This paper explores how ‘new policy actors’, market-orientated and profit-driven players, construct the crisis of literacy and schooling in Australia to reclaim the doxa of literacy education. The concept of doxa is employed to show how recent discursive practices are contributing to orthodox and heterodox positions. A mixed-methods content analysis was performed on reports produced by business groups and their proxies, analysing how these reports construct new narratives. The findings reveal how these stakeholders adopt a stance best characterised as the old doxa revisited and (re)orientated for new economic imperatives. A defence of literacy as ‘common-sense’ basic skills, in crisis, and predominantly developed through schooling for the purpose of work, is supplemented with a discourse which updates literacy doxa to include technological (media) dimensions where digital literacy skills are the ‘new basics’ of literacy education.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"975 - 987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Re)orientating literacy doxa in the digital age: the discursive practices of new policy actors\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Bacalja\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681366.2021.1983856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT deological struggles over the policy and practice of literacy education continue to characterise the field. This paper explores how ‘new policy actors’, market-orientated and profit-driven players, construct the crisis of literacy and schooling in Australia to reclaim the doxa of literacy education. The concept of doxa is employed to show how recent discursive practices are contributing to orthodox and heterodox positions. A mixed-methods content analysis was performed on reports produced by business groups and their proxies, analysing how these reports construct new narratives. The findings reveal how these stakeholders adopt a stance best characterised as the old doxa revisited and (re)orientated for new economic imperatives. A defence of literacy as ‘common-sense’ basic skills, in crisis, and predominantly developed through schooling for the purpose of work, is supplemented with a discourse which updates literacy doxa to include technological (media) dimensions where digital literacy skills are the ‘new basics’ of literacy education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"975 - 987\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1983856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1983856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于扫盲教育政策和实践的道义斗争仍然是该领域的特点。本文探讨了以市场为导向和利润驱动的“新政策参与者”如何构建澳大利亚的识字和教育危机,以恢复识字教育的多沙。doxa的概念被用来展示最近的话语实践是如何促成正统和异端立场的。对商业团体及其代理人制作的报告进行了混合方法内容分析,分析了这些报告如何构建新的叙述。研究结果揭示了这些利益相关者如何采取一种最具特色的立场,即重新审视旧的多萨,并(重新)定位新的经济需求。在危机中,将识字作为“常识性”基本技能进行辩护,主要是通过学校教育为工作目的发展的,并辅以一篇更新识字doxa的文章,将数字识字技能纳入识字教育的“新基础”的技术(媒体)层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(Re)orientating literacy doxa in the digital age: the discursive practices of new policy actors
ABSTRACT deological struggles over the policy and practice of literacy education continue to characterise the field. This paper explores how ‘new policy actors’, market-orientated and profit-driven players, construct the crisis of literacy and schooling in Australia to reclaim the doxa of literacy education. The concept of doxa is employed to show how recent discursive practices are contributing to orthodox and heterodox positions. A mixed-methods content analysis was performed on reports produced by business groups and their proxies, analysing how these reports construct new narratives. The findings reveal how these stakeholders adopt a stance best characterised as the old doxa revisited and (re)orientated for new economic imperatives. A defence of literacy as ‘common-sense’ basic skills, in crisis, and predominantly developed through schooling for the purpose of work, is supplemented with a discourse which updates literacy doxa to include technological (media) dimensions where digital literacy skills are the ‘new basics’ of literacy education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Indigenous parents’ co-leadership through culturally responsive home-school partnerships: a practical implementation framework “The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: the voice of community partners within European Service-Learning Personal, pedagogic play: a dialogic model for video game learning Nurturing inclusivity and professional growth among vocational teachers through communities of practice The manifestations of universality and cultural specificity in national curriculum policy frameworks: negotiations for culturally reflective practice in early childhood education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1