美国雄激素性脱发临床试验中的种族和民族差异

I. Aggarwal, Carolina Puyana, N. Chandan, R. Haber
{"title":"美国雄激素性脱发临床试验中的种族和民族差异","authors":"I. Aggarwal, Carolina Puyana, N. Chandan, R. Haber","doi":"10.29245/2767-5092/2022/4.1164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common type of hair loss worldwide and is estimated to affect about 80 million people in the United States. Recent trends suggest that incidence and severity of the disease are increasing across all genders and races. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving diverse patient populations are necessary to individualize treatment. Objective: Evaluate enrollment and subgroup analysis of people falling in racial/ethnic minority groups in phase II and III RCTs for AGA published in the United States within the past 10 years. Methods: We examined completed published phase II and III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating AGA. Race/ethnicity data was extracted for each RCT using US Census Bureau guidelines. Results: 20 total RCTs with a total of 1855 participants were included in the analysis. 8 (40%) of RCTs included race/ethnicity data. Among these, 3 (15%) studies included only race and 5 (25%) included both. The majority of study patients were white (n= 862/1063, 81.1%) followed by African American (n=127/1063, 11.9%) and Asian (n=33/1063, 3.1%). Six (0.56%) patients identified as American Indian/Alaska Natives, 5 (0.47%) as Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 16 (1.5%) as another race or race was unknown. Ethnicity was reported in 5 (25%) of trials, totaling 317 participants; 60 (18.9%) patients identified as Hispanic. Conclusions: Non-Caucasian patients remain underrepresented in RCTs despite AGA being a highly prevalent condition, reducing the generalizability of trial outcomes to the general population. Future RCTs should update definitions of race/ethnicity and include more diversity among AGA patients.","PeriodicalId":73705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dermatology and skin science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Androgenetic Alopecia Clinical Trials in the United States\",\"authors\":\"I. Aggarwal, Carolina Puyana, N. Chandan, R. Haber\",\"doi\":\"10.29245/2767-5092/2022/4.1164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common type of hair loss worldwide and is estimated to affect about 80 million people in the United States. Recent trends suggest that incidence and severity of the disease are increasing across all genders and races. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving diverse patient populations are necessary to individualize treatment. Objective: Evaluate enrollment and subgroup analysis of people falling in racial/ethnic minority groups in phase II and III RCTs for AGA published in the United States within the past 10 years. Methods: We examined completed published phase II and III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating AGA. Race/ethnicity data was extracted for each RCT using US Census Bureau guidelines. Results: 20 total RCTs with a total of 1855 participants were included in the analysis. 8 (40%) of RCTs included race/ethnicity data. Among these, 3 (15%) studies included only race and 5 (25%) included both. The majority of study patients were white (n= 862/1063, 81.1%) followed by African American (n=127/1063, 11.9%) and Asian (n=33/1063, 3.1%). Six (0.56%) patients identified as American Indian/Alaska Natives, 5 (0.47%) as Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 16 (1.5%) as another race or race was unknown. Ethnicity was reported in 5 (25%) of trials, totaling 317 participants; 60 (18.9%) patients identified as Hispanic. Conclusions: Non-Caucasian patients remain underrepresented in RCTs despite AGA being a highly prevalent condition, reducing the generalizability of trial outcomes to the general population. Future RCTs should update definitions of race/ethnicity and include more diversity among AGA patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dermatology and skin science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dermatology and skin science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29245/2767-5092/2022/4.1164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dermatology and skin science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29245/2767-5092/2022/4.1164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:雄激素性脱发(AGA)是世界上最常见的脱发类型,估计在美国约有8000万人受到影响。最近的趋势表明,该疾病的发病率和严重程度在所有性别和种族中都在增加。随机对照试验(rct)涉及不同的患者群体是必要的个体化治疗。目的:评估过去10年在美国发表的针对AGA的II期和III期随机对照试验中,种族/少数民族人群的入组情况和亚组分析。方法:我们研究了已发表的研究AGA的II期和III期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。根据美国人口普查局的指南提取每个随机对照试验的种族/民族数据。结果:共纳入20项随机对照试验,共纳入1855名受试者。8项(40%)随机对照试验包含种族/民族数据。其中,3项(15%)研究只包括种族,5项(25%)研究同时包括种族和种族。研究中大多数患者为白人(n= 862/1063, 81.1%),其次为非洲裔美国人(n=127/1063, 11.9%)和亚洲人(n=33/1063, 3.1%)。6例(0.56%)为美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民,5例(0.47%)为夏威夷/太平洋岛民,16例(1.5%)为其他种族或种族未知。5项试验(25%)报告了种族,共计317名受试者;60例(18.9%)患者为西班牙裔。结论:尽管AGA是一种非常普遍的疾病,但非高加索患者在随机对照试验中的代表性仍然不足,这降低了试验结果对普通人群的普遍性。未来的随机对照试验应更新种族/民族的定义,并在AGA患者中纳入更多的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Androgenetic Alopecia Clinical Trials in the United States
Introduction: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common type of hair loss worldwide and is estimated to affect about 80 million people in the United States. Recent trends suggest that incidence and severity of the disease are increasing across all genders and races. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving diverse patient populations are necessary to individualize treatment. Objective: Evaluate enrollment and subgroup analysis of people falling in racial/ethnic minority groups in phase II and III RCTs for AGA published in the United States within the past 10 years. Methods: We examined completed published phase II and III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials investigating AGA. Race/ethnicity data was extracted for each RCT using US Census Bureau guidelines. Results: 20 total RCTs with a total of 1855 participants were included in the analysis. 8 (40%) of RCTs included race/ethnicity data. Among these, 3 (15%) studies included only race and 5 (25%) included both. The majority of study patients were white (n= 862/1063, 81.1%) followed by African American (n=127/1063, 11.9%) and Asian (n=33/1063, 3.1%). Six (0.56%) patients identified as American Indian/Alaska Natives, 5 (0.47%) as Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, and 16 (1.5%) as another race or race was unknown. Ethnicity was reported in 5 (25%) of trials, totaling 317 participants; 60 (18.9%) patients identified as Hispanic. Conclusions: Non-Caucasian patients remain underrepresented in RCTs despite AGA being a highly prevalent condition, reducing the generalizability of trial outcomes to the general population. Future RCTs should update definitions of race/ethnicity and include more diversity among AGA patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-Supervised Learning in Skin Cancer Detection: The Roles of Topological Contrastive Learning with Geometric Analysis Topical Application of Aprepitant Inhibits Erlotinib-induced Facial Dermatitis/Hair Loss Commentary: Systemic Therapy for Mucosal Lichen Planus with a Focus on Oral Lichen Planus: Update and Review of Challenges and Successes Commentary: Systemic Therapy for Mucosal Lichen Planus with a Focus on Oral Lichen Planus: Update and Review of Challenges and Successes Indications for Adjuvant (Chemo) Radiotherapy in Vulvar Cancer with Groin Lymph Node Metastases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1