16世纪下半叶的中亚和西西伯利亚(政治和民族文化关系)

A. Р. Yarkov
{"title":"16世纪下半叶的中亚和西西伯利亚(政治和民族文化关系)","authors":"A. Р. Yarkov","doi":"10.14258/nreur(2021)3-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"XVI century became a “point of bifurcation, both in the history of Western Siberia and in relations with Central Asia. \nDefined by ethnolinguistic kinship with the Turkic population of Siberia, in the XVIth century. Interest was smoldering in Central Asia. But there was not enough (including military and missionary) forces to move north. Economic aspects (including the expansion of the market of goods) mutually beneficial contacts “rested” not only in the complexity of communications, but also in the difference of mental attitudes and socio-cultural features. The religious community of the population of the two megaregions was poorly felt. Unity on the basis of faith has retreated, in some cases, to the background under the pressure of circumstances. Islam did not become the dominant (state) religion in Siberia. In the second half of the 16th century, the number of local Muslims remained modest amid a larger number of supporters of archaic beliefs. The spiritual practices of the Muslims of Siberia differed from the established traditions of the fellow believers of Central Asia. \nThe Russian state did not disturb the “balance” between the eastern and western vectors until it acquired territorial acquisitions on the Volga and then in Asia. \nBehind each “player” were geopolitical interests shaped by dominant ideas, and not only religious ones.","PeriodicalId":33184,"journal":{"name":"Narody i religii Evrazii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Central Asia and Western Siberia in the second half of the XVI century (political and ethnocultural relations)\",\"authors\":\"A. Р. Yarkov\",\"doi\":\"10.14258/nreur(2021)3-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"XVI century became a “point of bifurcation, both in the history of Western Siberia and in relations with Central Asia. \\nDefined by ethnolinguistic kinship with the Turkic population of Siberia, in the XVIth century. Interest was smoldering in Central Asia. But there was not enough (including military and missionary) forces to move north. Economic aspects (including the expansion of the market of goods) mutually beneficial contacts “rested” not only in the complexity of communications, but also in the difference of mental attitudes and socio-cultural features. The religious community of the population of the two megaregions was poorly felt. Unity on the basis of faith has retreated, in some cases, to the background under the pressure of circumstances. Islam did not become the dominant (state) religion in Siberia. In the second half of the 16th century, the number of local Muslims remained modest amid a larger number of supporters of archaic beliefs. The spiritual practices of the Muslims of Siberia differed from the established traditions of the fellow believers of Central Asia. \\nThe Russian state did not disturb the “balance” between the eastern and western vectors until it acquired territorial acquisitions on the Volga and then in Asia. \\nBehind each “player” were geopolitical interests shaped by dominant ideas, and not only religious ones.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Narody i religii Evrazii\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Narody i religii Evrazii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14258/nreur(2021)3-06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narody i religii Evrazii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14258/nreur(2021)3-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

十六世纪成为“西西伯利亚历史和与中亚关系的分歧点。在十六世纪,这是由与西伯利亚突厥人的民族语言亲缘关系所定义的。中亚的兴趣正在燃烧。但没有足够的(包括军事和传教士)力量北上。经济方面(包括商品市场的扩张)互利的接触“停留”在沟通的复杂性上,还停留在心理态度和社会文化特征的差异上。这两个大区人民的宗教团体感觉很差。在某些情况下,基于信仰的团结在环境的压力下退居幕后。伊斯兰教并没有成为西伯利亚占主导地位的(国家)宗教。在16世纪下半叶,当地穆斯林的数量仍然很少,因为有更多的古老信仰的支持者。西伯利亚穆斯林的精神实践与中亚其他信徒的既定传统不同。俄罗斯政府并没有扰乱东西方矢量之间的“平衡”,直到它在伏尔加河和亚洲获得了领土。每个“玩家”背后都是由主导思想塑造的地缘政治利益,而不仅仅是宗教利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Central Asia and Western Siberia in the second half of the XVI century (political and ethnocultural relations)
XVI century became a “point of bifurcation, both in the history of Western Siberia and in relations with Central Asia. Defined by ethnolinguistic kinship with the Turkic population of Siberia, in the XVIth century. Interest was smoldering in Central Asia. But there was not enough (including military and missionary) forces to move north. Economic aspects (including the expansion of the market of goods) mutually beneficial contacts “rested” not only in the complexity of communications, but also in the difference of mental attitudes and socio-cultural features. The religious community of the population of the two megaregions was poorly felt. Unity on the basis of faith has retreated, in some cases, to the background under the pressure of circumstances. Islam did not become the dominant (state) religion in Siberia. In the second half of the 16th century, the number of local Muslims remained modest amid a larger number of supporters of archaic beliefs. The spiritual practices of the Muslims of Siberia differed from the established traditions of the fellow believers of Central Asia. The Russian state did not disturb the “balance” between the eastern and western vectors until it acquired territorial acquisitions on the Volga and then in Asia. Behind each “player” were geopolitical interests shaped by dominant ideas, and not only religious ones.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Unearthing East Kazakhstan's Early Saka Combat Belt: A New Archaeological Discovery Ethno-cultural processes in the Middle Tom River region in the 11th-12th centuries Exploring Key Issues in the History of the Zhongshan Kingdom Exploring the Unconventional: Revisiting Altai Funeral Rites during the Early Scythian Era through the Karban-I Complex Materials Fortresses of the Turkmen Tekke Tribe in the 18th-19th centuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1