植入永久性起搏器的患者:基线特征和冠状动脉造影

Ismail Alsuz, Mahdi Al-Zaidi
{"title":"植入永久性起搏器的患者:基线特征和冠状动脉造影","authors":"Ismail Alsuz, Mahdi Al-Zaidi","doi":"10.5083/ejcm20424884.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n\nBackground: Etiology of severe cardiac conduction disturbances is frequently uncertain. The risk factors of both coronary artery disease and conduction defects often overlap. Considering this, the present study aimed to find the relationship between complete heart block and specific pathological coronary anatomy.\n\nMaterial and Methods: Seventy-eight patients, (39 patients with a permanent pacemaker and 39 matched control patients who underwent coronary angiography procedure) were studied. The lesions were classified into four types, according to the anatomy of blood supply to the different segments of the conduction system.\n\nResults: Type IV lesion was common in study group compared to matched control group where type III lesion was common. Lesions that compromise blood flow to septal branches (types II and IV) were common in study group and the lesion types that do not compromise blood flow (types I and III) were common in control group (p<0.001). Type 1 lesion were common in females (p<0.001). Type IV lesions were common in hypertensive, whereas, non- hypertensive and non-diabetic patients had type 1 lesions (p<0.001). Similarly, patients with LV dysfunction had type 4 lesion compared to the patients without LV dysfunction who had type 1 lesions (p<0.001)\n\nConclusions: Patients with permanent pacemakers having coronary artery disease are more likely to have specific coronary angiographic findings. Therefore, the site of lesions and not the severity or extent of atherosclerosis is responsible for the conduction disturbances.","PeriodicalId":75000,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients with Implanted Permanent Pacemakers: Baseline Characteristics and Coronary Angiographic Profile\",\"authors\":\"Ismail Alsuz, Mahdi Al-Zaidi\",\"doi\":\"10.5083/ejcm20424884.176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n\\nBackground: Etiology of severe cardiac conduction disturbances is frequently uncertain. The risk factors of both coronary artery disease and conduction defects often overlap. Considering this, the present study aimed to find the relationship between complete heart block and specific pathological coronary anatomy.\\n\\nMaterial and Methods: Seventy-eight patients, (39 patients with a permanent pacemaker and 39 matched control patients who underwent coronary angiography procedure) were studied. The lesions were classified into four types, according to the anatomy of blood supply to the different segments of the conduction system.\\n\\nResults: Type IV lesion was common in study group compared to matched control group where type III lesion was common. Lesions that compromise blood flow to septal branches (types II and IV) were common in study group and the lesion types that do not compromise blood flow (types I and III) were common in control group (p<0.001). Type 1 lesion were common in females (p<0.001). Type IV lesions were common in hypertensive, whereas, non- hypertensive and non-diabetic patients had type 1 lesions (p<0.001). Similarly, patients with LV dysfunction had type 4 lesion compared to the patients without LV dysfunction who had type 1 lesions (p<0.001)\\n\\nConclusions: Patients with permanent pacemakers having coronary artery disease are more likely to have specific coronary angiographic findings. Therefore, the site of lesions and not the severity or extent of atherosclerosis is responsible for the conduction disturbances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5083/ejcm20424884.176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5083/ejcm20424884.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:严重心脏传导障碍的病因经常不确定。冠状动脉疾病和传导缺陷的危险因素经常重叠。考虑到这一点,本研究旨在寻找完全性心脏传导阻滞与特定病理冠状动脉解剖之间的关系。材料和方法:对78例患者(39例使用永久性起搏器的患者和39例接受冠状动脉造影手术的匹配对照患者)进行了研究。根据传导系统不同节段的血液供应解剖,将病变分为四种类型。结果:与III型病变常见的对照组相比,研究组的IV型病变常见。损害隔支血流的病变(II型和IV型)在研究组中很常见,而不损害血流的病变类型(I型和III型)在对照组中很普遍(p<0.001)。1型病变在女性中很常见(p<001)。IV型病变在高血压中很普遍,而非高血压和非糖尿病患者有1型病变(p<0.01)。同样,与无左心室功能障碍的1型病变患者相比,有左心室功能障碍患者有4型病变(p<0.001)结论:患有冠状动脉疾病的永久性起搏器患者更有可能有特定的冠状动脉造影结果。因此,传导障碍的原因是病变部位,而不是动脉粥样硬化的严重程度或程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patients with Implanted Permanent Pacemakers: Baseline Characteristics and Coronary Angiographic Profile
ABSTRACT Background: Etiology of severe cardiac conduction disturbances is frequently uncertain. The risk factors of both coronary artery disease and conduction defects often overlap. Considering this, the present study aimed to find the relationship between complete heart block and specific pathological coronary anatomy. Material and Methods: Seventy-eight patients, (39 patients with a permanent pacemaker and 39 matched control patients who underwent coronary angiography procedure) were studied. The lesions were classified into four types, according to the anatomy of blood supply to the different segments of the conduction system. Results: Type IV lesion was common in study group compared to matched control group where type III lesion was common. Lesions that compromise blood flow to septal branches (types II and IV) were common in study group and the lesion types that do not compromise blood flow (types I and III) were common in control group (p<0.001). Type 1 lesion were common in females (p<0.001). Type IV lesions were common in hypertensive, whereas, non- hypertensive and non-diabetic patients had type 1 lesions (p<0.001). Similarly, patients with LV dysfunction had type 4 lesion compared to the patients without LV dysfunction who had type 1 lesions (p<0.001) Conclusions: Patients with permanent pacemakers having coronary artery disease are more likely to have specific coronary angiographic findings. Therefore, the site of lesions and not the severity or extent of atherosclerosis is responsible for the conduction disturbances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Association of N-terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide with Haemoglobin and Ferritin in Heart Failure Patients Bronchogenic Cyst Associated with an Ostium Secundum Atrial Septal Defect in a One and Half Month Infant: Is it the Youngest Patient Yet Late Complete Heart Block after Surgical Repair of an Atrial Septal Defect Myocarditis with Biventricular Dysfunction Caused by Parvovirus B19 – A case report Correlation between Body Mass Index and Radiation Dose in Patients Undergoing Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1