实际行动能证明现实主义原则的合理性吗?作为现实主义家庭成员的规范行为主义

J. Floyd
{"title":"实际行动能证明现实主义原则的合理性吗?作为现实主义家庭成员的规范行为主义","authors":"J. Floyd","doi":"10.1080/13698230.2022.2120656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT If Alison McQueen is right that there is a broad ‘family’ of realist approaches to political theory, then it follows there are several ways of ‘doing’ realism, as illustrated by this collection. Here, I set out one such way, normative behaviourism, by explaining its realist character on four fronts: Its starting point; its values; its ambitions; and its treatment of a shared problem. The argument then considers two key objections to the described approach, both of which affect a range of possible realisms.","PeriodicalId":46451,"journal":{"name":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","volume":"26 1","pages":"356 - 375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can real actions justify realist principles? Normative behaviourism as a member of the realist family\",\"authors\":\"J. Floyd\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698230.2022.2120656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT If Alison McQueen is right that there is a broad ‘family’ of realist approaches to political theory, then it follows there are several ways of ‘doing’ realism, as illustrated by this collection. Here, I set out one such way, normative behaviourism, by explaining its realist character on four fronts: Its starting point; its values; its ambitions; and its treatment of a shared problem. The argument then considers two key objections to the described approach, both of which affect a range of possible realisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"356 - 375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2120656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要如果Alison McQueen认为政治理论有一个广泛的现实主义方法“家族”是正确的,那么正如本集所示,现实主义有几种“实践”方式。在这里,我从四个方面阐述了规范行为主义的现实主义特征:它的出发点;其价值观;其野心;以及它对一个共同问题的处理。然后,该论点考虑了对所述方法的两个关键反对意见,这两个反对意见都影响了一系列可能的现实主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can real actions justify realist principles? Normative behaviourism as a member of the realist family
ABSTRACT If Alison McQueen is right that there is a broad ‘family’ of realist approaches to political theory, then it follows there are several ways of ‘doing’ realism, as illustrated by this collection. Here, I set out one such way, normative behaviourism, by explaining its realist character on four fronts: Its starting point; its values; its ambitions; and its treatment of a shared problem. The argument then considers two key objections to the described approach, both of which affect a range of possible realisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
期刊最新文献
On the importance of justice-promoting projects besides reform intervention On the object and subject of reform intervention: comments on Lucia Rafanelli’s promoting justice across borders Rethinking the bounds of politics: a symposium on Lucia Rafanelli’s promoting justice across borders: the ethics of reform intervention (Oxford University Press, 2021) What toleration is not Whose duty? Which reform?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1