李的当代再审视禮 和人类尊严

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Frontiers of Philosophy in China Pub Date : 2018-09-27 DOI:10.3868/S030-007-018-0034-4
Xu Keqian
{"title":"李的当代再审视禮 和人类尊严","authors":"Xu Keqian","doi":"10.3868/S030-007-018-0034-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In modern Western liberal discourse, human dignity has been cast as an important component of basic human rights, while so-called human rights have been generally understood as certain inborn, inherent and inalienable properties of every human being. In this understanding, human dignity is just a natural endowment rather than a historically constructed social-cultural phenomenon. Based on this premise, liberalism is justified for the reason that under a social condition of complete freedom, individuals will spontaneously exercise their rights thus to secure their dignity. However, from a Confucian point of view, human dignity is socially defined and exists in concrete forms in social-cultural contexts. Dignity is not an abstract, universal, minimal standard that can be applied to all people at every time; it refers to individuals’ decency and grace under various given social contexts, and it corresponds to particular roles, statuses and even ages and genders of individuals in their respective societies. The full realization of human dignity relies on certain social-cultural or institutional arrangements. Confucian li is precisely this kind of arrangement, which designs a whole set of regulations and norms in order to maintain human dignity in general, as well as to maintain different people’s dignity in varying situations. Therefore, according to Confucianism, behaving appropriately according to the norms and regulations of li is just a way to preserve dignity.","PeriodicalId":42530,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Philosophy in China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3868/S030-007-018-0034-4","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Contemporary Re-Examination of Confucian Li 禮 and Human Dignity\",\"authors\":\"Xu Keqian\",\"doi\":\"10.3868/S030-007-018-0034-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In modern Western liberal discourse, human dignity has been cast as an important component of basic human rights, while so-called human rights have been generally understood as certain inborn, inherent and inalienable properties of every human being. In this understanding, human dignity is just a natural endowment rather than a historically constructed social-cultural phenomenon. Based on this premise, liberalism is justified for the reason that under a social condition of complete freedom, individuals will spontaneously exercise their rights thus to secure their dignity. However, from a Confucian point of view, human dignity is socially defined and exists in concrete forms in social-cultural contexts. Dignity is not an abstract, universal, minimal standard that can be applied to all people at every time; it refers to individuals’ decency and grace under various given social contexts, and it corresponds to particular roles, statuses and even ages and genders of individuals in their respective societies. The full realization of human dignity relies on certain social-cultural or institutional arrangements. Confucian li is precisely this kind of arrangement, which designs a whole set of regulations and norms in order to maintain human dignity in general, as well as to maintain different people’s dignity in varying situations. Therefore, according to Confucianism, behaving appropriately according to the norms and regulations of li is just a way to preserve dignity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Philosophy in China\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3868/S030-007-018-0034-4\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Philosophy in China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1095\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3868/S030-007-018-0034-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Philosophy in China","FirstCategoryId":"1095","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3868/S030-007-018-0034-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在现代西方自由主义话语中,人的尊严被视为基本人权的重要组成部分,而所谓的人权通常被理解为每个人与生俱来、固有和不可剥夺的某些属性。在这种理解中,人的尊严只是一种自然禀赋,而不是一种历史建构的社会文化现象。基于这一前提,自由主义是合理的,因为在完全自由的社会条件下,个人会自发地行使自己的权利,从而确保自己的尊严。然而,从儒家的角度来看,人的尊严是社会定义的,并以具体形式存在于社会文化语境中。尊严不是一个抽象的、普遍的、最低限度的标准,可以在任何时候适用于所有人;它指的是个人在各种特定社会背景下的体面和优雅,与个人在各自社会中的特定角色、地位甚至年龄和性别相对应。人的尊严的充分实现依赖于某些社会文化或制度安排。李正是这种安排,他设计了一整套的规则和规范,以维护人的尊严,并在不同的情况下维护不同的人的尊严。因此,根据儒家思想,按照李的规范和规定行事是一种维护尊严的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Contemporary Re-Examination of Confucian Li 禮 and Human Dignity
In modern Western liberal discourse, human dignity has been cast as an important component of basic human rights, while so-called human rights have been generally understood as certain inborn, inherent and inalienable properties of every human being. In this understanding, human dignity is just a natural endowment rather than a historically constructed social-cultural phenomenon. Based on this premise, liberalism is justified for the reason that under a social condition of complete freedom, individuals will spontaneously exercise their rights thus to secure their dignity. However, from a Confucian point of view, human dignity is socially defined and exists in concrete forms in social-cultural contexts. Dignity is not an abstract, universal, minimal standard that can be applied to all people at every time; it refers to individuals’ decency and grace under various given social contexts, and it corresponds to particular roles, statuses and even ages and genders of individuals in their respective societies. The full realization of human dignity relies on certain social-cultural or institutional arrangements. Confucian li is precisely this kind of arrangement, which designs a whole set of regulations and norms in order to maintain human dignity in general, as well as to maintain different people’s dignity in varying situations. Therefore, according to Confucianism, behaving appropriately according to the norms and regulations of li is just a way to preserve dignity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
525
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Philosophy in China seeks to provide a forum for a broad blend of peer-reviewed academic papers in order to promote communication and cooperation between philosophers in China and abroad. It is to reflect the remarkable achievements that have been made in Chinese universities in philosophy research. Its coverage includes the following main branches of philosophy: Western philosophy, Chinese philosophy, philosophy of science and technology, political philosophy, history of philosophy, aesthetics, ethics, religion, etc. The journal especially encourages papers related to classical Chinese philosophy and Marxist philosophy and puts special emphasis on exploring the philosophical thoughts of the prominent Chinese philosophers since the period of "Hundred Schools of Thought".
期刊最新文献
Truth and Nonsense: A Unified Reading of the Tractatus Wittgenstein on Reading The Inverted Spectrum, Qualia, and Wittgenstein’s Grammatical Analysis The Chinese Understanding of Wittgenstein’s Mysticism in the Tractatus Diachronic Emergence and Its Characteristics from the Viewpoint of Complexity Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1