不同氮肥配方对草地氮氧化物排放的交互作用

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research Pub Date : 2017-09-19 DOI:10.1515/ijafr-2017-0006
D. Krol, E. Minet, P. Forrestal, G. Lanigan, O. Mathieu, K. Richards
{"title":"不同氮肥配方对草地氮氧化物排放的交互作用","authors":"D. Krol, E. Minet, P. Forrestal, G. Lanigan, O. Mathieu, K. Richards","doi":"10.1515/ijafr-2017-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Pasture-based livestock agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O). Although a body of research is available on the effect of urine patch N or fertiliser N on N2O emissions, limited data is available on the effect of fertiliser N applied to patches of urinary N, which can cover up to a fifth of the yearly grazed area. This study investigated whether the sum of N2O emissions from urine and a range of N fertilisers, calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) or urea ± urease inhibitor ± nitrification inhibitor, applied alone (disaggregated and re-aggregated) approximated the N2O emission of urine and fertiliser N applied together (aggregated). Application of fertiliser to urine patches did not significantly increase either the cumulative yearly N2O emissions or the N2O emission factor in comparison to urine and fertiliser applied separately with the emissions re-aggregated. However, there was a consistent trend for approximately 20% underestimation of N2O loss generated from fertiliser and urine applied separately when compared to figures generated when urine and fertiliser were applied together. N2O emission factors from fertilisers were 0.02%, 0.06%, 0.17% and 0.25% from urea ± dicyandiamide (DCD), urea + N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) + DCD, urea + NBPT and urea, respectively, while the emission factor for urine alone was 0.33%. Calcium ammonium nitrate and urea did not interact differently with urine even when the urea included DCD. N2O losses could be reduced by switching from CAN to urea-based fertilisers.","PeriodicalId":14659,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research","volume":"56 1","pages":"54 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/ijafr-2017-0006","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The interactive effects of various nitrogen fertiliser formulations applied to urine patches on nitrous oxide emissions in grassland\",\"authors\":\"D. Krol, E. Minet, P. Forrestal, G. Lanigan, O. Mathieu, K. Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/ijafr-2017-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Pasture-based livestock agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O). Although a body of research is available on the effect of urine patch N or fertiliser N on N2O emissions, limited data is available on the effect of fertiliser N applied to patches of urinary N, which can cover up to a fifth of the yearly grazed area. This study investigated whether the sum of N2O emissions from urine and a range of N fertilisers, calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) or urea ± urease inhibitor ± nitrification inhibitor, applied alone (disaggregated and re-aggregated) approximated the N2O emission of urine and fertiliser N applied together (aggregated). Application of fertiliser to urine patches did not significantly increase either the cumulative yearly N2O emissions or the N2O emission factor in comparison to urine and fertiliser applied separately with the emissions re-aggregated. However, there was a consistent trend for approximately 20% underestimation of N2O loss generated from fertiliser and urine applied separately when compared to figures generated when urine and fertiliser were applied together. N2O emission factors from fertilisers were 0.02%, 0.06%, 0.17% and 0.25% from urea ± dicyandiamide (DCD), urea + N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) + DCD, urea + NBPT and urea, respectively, while the emission factor for urine alone was 0.33%. Calcium ammonium nitrate and urea did not interact differently with urine even when the urea included DCD. N2O losses could be reduced by switching from CAN to urea-based fertilisers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"54 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/ijafr-2017-0006\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijafr-2017-0006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/ijafr-2017-0006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

摘要牧场畜牧业是温室气体(GHG)一氧化二氮(N2O)的主要来源。尽管有大量关于尿氮或肥料氮对N2O排放的影响的研究,但关于肥料氮对尿氮斑块的影响的数据有限,尿氮斑块可以覆盖每年五分之一的放牧面积。本研究调查了尿液和一系列氮肥(硝酸钙铵(CAN)或尿素±脲酶抑制剂±硝化抑制剂,单独施用(分解和重新聚集)的N2O排放量总和是否接近尿液和化肥N一起施用(聚集)的N2 O排放量。与单独施用尿液和肥料并重新聚集排放物相比,在尿液贴片上施用化肥并没有显著增加年累计N2O排放量或N2O排放系数。然而,与同时施用肥料和尿液时产生的数字相比,单独施用化肥和尿液产生的N2O损失被低估了约20%,这是一个一致的趋势。尿素±双氰胺(DCD)、尿素+N-(正丁基)硫代磷酸三胺(NBPT)+DCD、尿素+NBPT和尿素的N2O排放因子分别为0.02%、0.06%、0.17%和0.25%,而单独尿液的排放因子为0.33%。即使尿素中含有DCD,硝酸铵钙和尿素与尿液的相互作用也没有不同。从CAN转向尿素肥料可以减少N2O的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The interactive effects of various nitrogen fertiliser formulations applied to urine patches on nitrous oxide emissions in grassland
Abstract Pasture-based livestock agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG) nitrous oxide (N2O). Although a body of research is available on the effect of urine patch N or fertiliser N on N2O emissions, limited data is available on the effect of fertiliser N applied to patches of urinary N, which can cover up to a fifth of the yearly grazed area. This study investigated whether the sum of N2O emissions from urine and a range of N fertilisers, calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) or urea ± urease inhibitor ± nitrification inhibitor, applied alone (disaggregated and re-aggregated) approximated the N2O emission of urine and fertiliser N applied together (aggregated). Application of fertiliser to urine patches did not significantly increase either the cumulative yearly N2O emissions or the N2O emission factor in comparison to urine and fertiliser applied separately with the emissions re-aggregated. However, there was a consistent trend for approximately 20% underestimation of N2O loss generated from fertiliser and urine applied separately when compared to figures generated when urine and fertiliser were applied together. N2O emission factors from fertilisers were 0.02%, 0.06%, 0.17% and 0.25% from urea ± dicyandiamide (DCD), urea + N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) + DCD, urea + NBPT and urea, respectively, while the emission factor for urine alone was 0.33%. Calcium ammonium nitrate and urea did not interact differently with urine even when the urea included DCD. N2O losses could be reduced by switching from CAN to urea-based fertilisers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research is a peer reviewed open access scientific journal published by Teagasc (Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Ireland). Manuscripts on any aspect of research of direct relevance to Irish agriculture and food production, including plant and animal sciences, food science, agri environmental science, soils, engineering, buildings, economics and sociology, will be considered for publication. The work must demonstrate novelty and relevance to the field of research. Papers published or offered for publication elsewhere will not be considered, but the publication of an abstract does not preclude the publication of the full paper in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Genetic and phenotypic trends for carcass traits in Irish beef cattle Influence of a cattle access point on temporal changes in stream turbidity Utilising commercial farm grass growth data to evaluate long-term dry matter production of perennial ryegrass varieties Consumer assessment, in Ireland and the United Kingdom, of the impact of the method of suspension of carcasses from dairy-origin bulls and steers, on the sensory characteristics of the longissimus muscle Labour self-sufficiency on family dairy farms in Ireland: a case study approach considering labour requirement, input and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1