跨国歧视:种姓制度和印度侨民

Q2 Social Sciences Transnational Legal Theory Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/20414005.2023.2176098
Frédéric Mégret, Moushita Dutta
{"title":"跨国歧视:种姓制度和印度侨民","authors":"Frédéric Mégret, Moushita Dutta","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2023.2176098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Discrimination is typically thought as a domestic phenomenon. This article, by contrast, seeks to shed light on the transnational arc of discrimination as a result of the migration of exclusionary practices through diasporic dispersion. It takes as its case study the problem of casteism in the Indian diaspora. The caste system has long been known as a distinctly ‘Indian’ phenomenon, but Indian migration has arguably made the problem an increasingly global one. The complexity of dealing with casteism arises at the intersection of: competing mobilisations of different sectors of the diaspora; the effort of host societies to understand the problem as, increasingly, a domestic one; and a tenuous but significant role of the state of origin (India). At the same time, host societies often appear unprepared to deal with the issue and are confronted with issues of inter-cultural competency, the difficulty of fitting caste within existing anti-discrimination categories, and fear of unduly stigmatising an entire community.","PeriodicalId":37728,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Legal Theory","volume":"13 1","pages":"391 - 430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transnational discrimination: the case of casteism and the Indian diaspora\",\"authors\":\"Frédéric Mégret, Moushita Dutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20414005.2023.2176098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Discrimination is typically thought as a domestic phenomenon. This article, by contrast, seeks to shed light on the transnational arc of discrimination as a result of the migration of exclusionary practices through diasporic dispersion. It takes as its case study the problem of casteism in the Indian diaspora. The caste system has long been known as a distinctly ‘Indian’ phenomenon, but Indian migration has arguably made the problem an increasingly global one. The complexity of dealing with casteism arises at the intersection of: competing mobilisations of different sectors of the diaspora; the effort of host societies to understand the problem as, increasingly, a domestic one; and a tenuous but significant role of the state of origin (India). At the same time, host societies often appear unprepared to deal with the issue and are confronted with issues of inter-cultural competency, the difficulty of fitting caste within existing anti-discrimination categories, and fear of unduly stigmatising an entire community.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"391 - 430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2176098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2023.2176098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

歧视通常被认为是一种国内现象。相比之下,本文试图揭示由于排他性做法通过散居分散而迁移而导致的跨国歧视弧线。它以印度侨民中的种姓制度问题为案例研究。种姓制度长期以来一直被认为是一种明显的“印度”现象,但印度移民可以说使这个问题日益成为一个全球性问题。处理种姓制度的复杂性出现在以下几个方面的交叉点:海外不同阶层相互竞争的动员;东道国社会努力将这一问题日益理解为一个国内问题;以及原产国(印度)微弱但重要的作用。与此同时,东道国社会往往似乎没有准备好处理这个问题,面临着跨文化能力的问题,难以将种姓纳入现有的反歧视类别,以及担心整个社区受到不适当的污名化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transnational discrimination: the case of casteism and the Indian diaspora
ABSTRACT Discrimination is typically thought as a domestic phenomenon. This article, by contrast, seeks to shed light on the transnational arc of discrimination as a result of the migration of exclusionary practices through diasporic dispersion. It takes as its case study the problem of casteism in the Indian diaspora. The caste system has long been known as a distinctly ‘Indian’ phenomenon, but Indian migration has arguably made the problem an increasingly global one. The complexity of dealing with casteism arises at the intersection of: competing mobilisations of different sectors of the diaspora; the effort of host societies to understand the problem as, increasingly, a domestic one; and a tenuous but significant role of the state of origin (India). At the same time, host societies often appear unprepared to deal with the issue and are confronted with issues of inter-cultural competency, the difficulty of fitting caste within existing anti-discrimination categories, and fear of unduly stigmatising an entire community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transnational Legal Theory
Transnational Legal Theory Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.
期刊最新文献
Toleration in the European Union: a forgotten virtue The construction of social Europe through transnational equality All in good time: temporal forms of public law decisions The Trojan Horse of sovereign debt Bluntschli, C’est Moi ? International legal history and hagiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1