反腐委员会在打击腐败犯罪中的概念理想监督

Yuridika Pub Date : 2022-08-05 DOI:10.20473/ydk.v37i2.36277
Atty Novyanty
{"title":"反腐委员会在打击腐败犯罪中的概念理想监督","authors":"Atty Novyanty","doi":"10.20473/ydk.v37i2.36277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One law enforcement agency that has the authority to carry out full supervision and investigation of corruption cases is the Corruption Eradication Commission. Article 50, paragraph (1) is problematic where the arrangement is incomplete and seems unclear. There is also a problem in the implementation of article 50, paragraph (3) concerning the phrase ‘The police or the prosecutor's office is no longer authorised to conduct a full investigation’. Article 50, paragraph (1) of Law No 30/2002 on the Commission for the Eradication of Corruption Crime (‘KPK Law’) provides that ‘in the event that a corruption crime occurs and the Corruption Eradication Commission has not conducted a full investigation, while the case has been fully investigated by the police or the prosecutor's office’. Article 10, paragraph (2) of Law No 19/2019 on the Second Amendment to Law No 30/2002 on the Commission for the Eradication of Corruption Crime (‘Law No 19/2019 on the Second Amendment to the KPK Law’) causes a problem because the provisions on the implementation of supervision duties should be regulated in the form of government regulations by referring to an adherence to the principle.","PeriodicalId":31372,"journal":{"name":"Yuridika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual Ideal Supervision of the Corruption Eradication Commission in Eradicating Corruption Crimes\",\"authors\":\"Atty Novyanty\",\"doi\":\"10.20473/ydk.v37i2.36277\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One law enforcement agency that has the authority to carry out full supervision and investigation of corruption cases is the Corruption Eradication Commission. Article 50, paragraph (1) is problematic where the arrangement is incomplete and seems unclear. There is also a problem in the implementation of article 50, paragraph (3) concerning the phrase ‘The police or the prosecutor's office is no longer authorised to conduct a full investigation’. Article 50, paragraph (1) of Law No 30/2002 on the Commission for the Eradication of Corruption Crime (‘KPK Law’) provides that ‘in the event that a corruption crime occurs and the Corruption Eradication Commission has not conducted a full investigation, while the case has been fully investigated by the police or the prosecutor's office’. Article 10, paragraph (2) of Law No 19/2019 on the Second Amendment to Law No 30/2002 on the Commission for the Eradication of Corruption Crime (‘Law No 19/2019 on the Second Amendment to the KPK Law’) causes a problem because the provisions on the implementation of supervision duties should be regulated in the form of government regulations by referring to an adherence to the principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31372,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yuridika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yuridika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i2.36277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v37i2.36277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有权对腐败案件进行全面监督和调查的一个执法机构是根除腐败委员会。第50条第(1)款在安排不完整且似乎不明确的情况下是有问题的。第50条第(3)款关于“警察或检察官办公室不再被授权进行全面调查”的执行也存在问题。关于根除腐败犯罪委员会的第30/2002号法律(“KPK法”)第50条第(1)款规定,“如果发生腐败犯罪,而根除腐败委员会没有进行全面调查,而警察或检察官办公室已经对案件进行了全面调查”。关于根除腐败犯罪委员会第30/2002号法律第二次修正案的第19/2019号法律(“关于KPK法第二次修订案的第19/2019号法律”)第10条第(2)款造成了一个问题,因为关于履行监督职责的规定应以政府法规的形式进行规范,并参照遵守这一原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Conceptual Ideal Supervision of the Corruption Eradication Commission in Eradicating Corruption Crimes
One law enforcement agency that has the authority to carry out full supervision and investigation of corruption cases is the Corruption Eradication Commission. Article 50, paragraph (1) is problematic where the arrangement is incomplete and seems unclear. There is also a problem in the implementation of article 50, paragraph (3) concerning the phrase ‘The police or the prosecutor's office is no longer authorised to conduct a full investigation’. Article 50, paragraph (1) of Law No 30/2002 on the Commission for the Eradication of Corruption Crime (‘KPK Law’) provides that ‘in the event that a corruption crime occurs and the Corruption Eradication Commission has not conducted a full investigation, while the case has been fully investigated by the police or the prosecutor's office’. Article 10, paragraph (2) of Law No 19/2019 on the Second Amendment to Law No 30/2002 on the Commission for the Eradication of Corruption Crime (‘Law No 19/2019 on the Second Amendment to the KPK Law’) causes a problem because the provisions on the implementation of supervision duties should be regulated in the form of government regulations by referring to an adherence to the principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Responsibilities of Medical Practice through Digital Health Platforms Estimating The Exploration And Production (E&P) Industry's Rig Contract Business Owner The WTO Dispute Settlement System and How It Incentivizes Imparity Between Indonesia’s Executive and Parliament Legal Protection for Child Victims of Bullying from the Perspective of Child Protection Law Enhancing Human Rights Protections in Ukrainian Law Enforcement: National Compliance with EU Standards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1