REDD+和亚马逊土著土地上的森林保护

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law Pub Date : 2021-02-14 DOI:10.1111/REEL.12389
Beatriz Garcia, Lawrence Rimmer, Leticia Canal Vieira, B. Mackey
{"title":"REDD+和亚马逊土著土地上的森林保护","authors":"Beatriz Garcia, Lawrence Rimmer, Leticia Canal Vieira, B. Mackey","doi":"10.1111/REEL.12389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeking to reverse the loss of forests and forest carbon stocks in developing countries, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)1 created the mechanism known as REDD+.2 This was introduced in a simple format at the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP) in 20053 and has since evolved into its current version: reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, plus fostering conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks.4 REDD+ operates on the basis of performancebased payments— that is, payments are conditional on the outcome of a REDD+ action.5 Brazil can benefit from REDD+, given that it holds around 60% of the Amazon’s 5.4 million km2 of tropical forest and is under ongoing landuse pressure.6 Amazonian indigenous territories store 27.1% of the region’s aboveground carbon (28,247 MtC; i.e. 28.247 million tonnes of carbon7) on roughly 30% of the land area.8 The indigenous","PeriodicalId":51681,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"REDD+ and forest protection on indigenous lands in the Amazon\",\"authors\":\"Beatriz Garcia, Lawrence Rimmer, Leticia Canal Vieira, B. Mackey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/REEL.12389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Seeking to reverse the loss of forests and forest carbon stocks in developing countries, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)1 created the mechanism known as REDD+.2 This was introduced in a simple format at the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP) in 20053 and has since evolved into its current version: reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, plus fostering conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks.4 REDD+ operates on the basis of performancebased payments— that is, payments are conditional on the outcome of a REDD+ action.5 Brazil can benefit from REDD+, given that it holds around 60% of the Amazon’s 5.4 million km2 of tropical forest and is under ongoing landuse pressure.6 Amazonian indigenous territories store 27.1% of the region’s aboveground carbon (28,247 MtC; i.e. 28.247 million tonnes of carbon7) on roughly 30% of the land area.8 The indigenous\",\"PeriodicalId\":51681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/REEL.12389\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/REEL.12389","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

为了扭转发展中国家森林和森林碳储量的损失,《联合国气候变化框架公约》1建立了一个名为REDD+的机制。2这一机制在2005年的《联合国环境变化框架公约缔约方会议》3上以简单的形式提出,并已发展成为目前的版本:减少毁林和森林退化造成的排放,再加上促进森林保护、可持续管理和增加森林碳储量。4 REDD+是在基于绩效的支付基础上运作的,也就是说,支付是以REDD+行动的结果为条件的。5巴西可以从REDD+中受益,考虑到它拥有亚马逊540万平方公里热带森林的约60%,并面临着持续的土地使用压力。6亚马逊土著领地在约30%的土地面积上储存了该地区27.1%的地上碳(28247 MtC;即2824.7万吨碳7)。8
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REDD+ and forest protection on indigenous lands in the Amazon
Seeking to reverse the loss of forests and forest carbon stocks in developing countries, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)1 created the mechanism known as REDD+.2 This was introduced in a simple format at the UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP) in 20053 and has since evolved into its current version: reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, plus fostering conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks.4 REDD+ operates on the basis of performancebased payments— that is, payments are conditional on the outcome of a REDD+ action.5 Brazil can benefit from REDD+, given that it holds around 60% of the Amazon’s 5.4 million km2 of tropical forest and is under ongoing landuse pressure.6 Amazonian indigenous territories store 27.1% of the region’s aboveground carbon (28,247 MtC; i.e. 28.247 million tonnes of carbon7) on roughly 30% of the land area.8 The indigenous
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
National discretion or broadening acceptable interpretation? A comparative overview of the transposition and implementation of the Water Framework Directive The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive The awkward relations between EU innovation policies and environmental law Towards the adoption of climate change acts in the Visegrad Group countries A quasi‐normative conflict: Resolving the tension between investment treaties and climate action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1