税务审计——论审计师工作量压缩与避税之间的关系

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Journal of Auditing Pub Date : 2022-08-03 DOI:10.1111/ijau.12289
Dennis M. Lopez, S. Mark Greenwald
{"title":"税务审计——论审计师工作量压缩与避税之间的关系","authors":"Dennis M. Lopez,&nbsp;S. Mark Greenwald","doi":"10.1111/ijau.12289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance. Heavy auditor workloads can limit the extent to which auditors are able to examine the determination of the income tax provision, creating opportunities for companies to maintain their tax avoidance strategies unimpeded. We find evidence indicating that audits performed by auditors with greater levels of workload compression are associated with greater levels of tax avoidance, as proxied by the cash effective tax rate, the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) effective tax rate and book-tax differences. We also investigate the role of auditor-provided tax services (APTS) on the said associations and find evidence generally consistent with knowledge spillover; however, we do not find evidence of a moderating effect from APTS on the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance. This study contributes to the auditing and tax literatures by being among the first to investigate whether audit-related constraints due to workload compression affect the outcomes of management's determination of the tax provision.</p>","PeriodicalId":47092,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Auditing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A taxing audit—On the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance\",\"authors\":\"Dennis M. Lopez,&nbsp;S. Mark Greenwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijau.12289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance. Heavy auditor workloads can limit the extent to which auditors are able to examine the determination of the income tax provision, creating opportunities for companies to maintain their tax avoidance strategies unimpeded. We find evidence indicating that audits performed by auditors with greater levels of workload compression are associated with greater levels of tax avoidance, as proxied by the cash effective tax rate, the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) effective tax rate and book-tax differences. We also investigate the role of auditor-provided tax services (APTS) on the said associations and find evidence generally consistent with knowledge spillover; however, we do not find evidence of a moderating effect from APTS on the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance. This study contributes to the auditing and tax literatures by being among the first to investigate whether audit-related constraints due to workload compression affect the outcomes of management's determination of the tax provision.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Auditing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Auditing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijau.12289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Auditing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijau.12289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了审计师工作量压缩与避税之间的关系。繁重的审计师工作量可能会限制审计师能够审查所得税条款确定的程度,为公司保持其避税策略不受阻碍创造机会。我们发现有证据表明,工作量压缩程度越高的审计师进行的审计与避税程度越高有关,如现金有效税率、公认会计原则(GAAP)有效税率和账面税收差异所代表的那样。我们还调查了审计师提供的税务服务(APTS)对上述协会的作用,并发现了与知识溢出基本一致的证据;然而,我们没有发现证据表明APTS对审计师工作量压缩和避税之间的关系有调节作用。本研究首次调查了由于工作量压缩而导致的审计相关约束是否会影响管理层确定税收准备的结果,从而对审计和税务文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A taxing audit—On the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance

This study investigates the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance. Heavy auditor workloads can limit the extent to which auditors are able to examine the determination of the income tax provision, creating opportunities for companies to maintain their tax avoidance strategies unimpeded. We find evidence indicating that audits performed by auditors with greater levels of workload compression are associated with greater levels of tax avoidance, as proxied by the cash effective tax rate, the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) effective tax rate and book-tax differences. We also investigate the role of auditor-provided tax services (APTS) on the said associations and find evidence generally consistent with knowledge spillover; however, we do not find evidence of a moderating effect from APTS on the association between auditor workload compression and tax avoidance. This study contributes to the auditing and tax literatures by being among the first to investigate whether audit-related constraints due to workload compression affect the outcomes of management's determination of the tax provision.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: In addition to communicating the results of original auditing research, the International Journal of Auditing also aims to advance knowledge in auditing by publishing critiques, thought leadership papers and literature reviews on specific aspects of auditing. The journal seeks to publish articles that have international appeal either due to the topic transcending national frontiers or due to the clear potential for readers to apply the results or ideas in their local environments. While articles must be methodologically and theoretically sound, any research orientation is acceptable. This means that papers may have an analytical and statistical, behavioural, economic and financial (including agency), sociological, critical, or historical basis. The editors consider articles for publication which fit into one or more of the following subject categories: • Financial statement audits • Public sector/governmental auditing • Internal auditing • Audit education and methods of teaching auditing (including case studies) • Audit aspects of corporate governance, including audit committees • Audit quality • Audit fees and related issues • Environmental, social and sustainability audits • Audit related ethical issues • Audit regulation • Independence issues • Legal liability and other legal issues • Auditing history • New and emerging audit and assurance issues
期刊最新文献
Key drivers of cybersecurity audit effectiveness: A neo‐institutional perspective Fresh‐look effect of audit firm and audit partner rotations? Evidence from European key audit matters The Big 4 effect for new audit services: The case of the Danish COVID‐19 fixed‐cost business‐support scheme Are there audit fee premiums for client portfolio management? Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1