数字化老年人护理的持续和集体特征:超越政府政策中的技术决定论

Jens Lindberg, Elin Kvist, Simon Lindgren
{"title":"数字化老年人护理的持续和集体特征:超越政府政策中的技术决定论","authors":"Jens Lindberg, Elin Kvist, Simon Lindgren","doi":"10.1080/15228835.2022.2144588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we contrast policy understandings of digital care with older people’s day-to-day digital care. In doing so, we discuss problems relating to deterministic approaches in government policy. Our policy analysis shows that digital care is articulated as an individual practice, and digital technologies as static actors. This bears clear marks of techno-deterministic reasoning. Our ethnographic study demonstrates the ongoing and collective character of older people’s digital care. When policy is not aligned with everyday practice, there is a risk of excluding groups of users. We argue that a socio-technical approach in government policy could contribute to achieving important societal goals.","PeriodicalId":46115,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","volume":"40 1","pages":"357 - 378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ongoing and Collective Character of Digital Care for Older People: Moving Beyond Techno-Determinism in Government Policy\",\"authors\":\"Jens Lindberg, Elin Kvist, Simon Lindgren\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15228835.2022.2144588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, we contrast policy understandings of digital care with older people’s day-to-day digital care. In doing so, we discuss problems relating to deterministic approaches in government policy. Our policy analysis shows that digital care is articulated as an individual practice, and digital technologies as static actors. This bears clear marks of techno-deterministic reasoning. Our ethnographic study demonstrates the ongoing and collective character of older people’s digital care. When policy is not aligned with everyday practice, there is a risk of excluding groups of users. We argue that a socio-technical approach in government policy could contribute to achieving important societal goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"357 - 378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2022.2144588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN HUMAN SERVICES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2022.2144588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要在本文中,我们将数字护理的政策理解与老年人的日常数字护理进行了对比。在这样做的过程中,我们讨论了与政府政策中的确定性方法有关的问题。我们的政策分析表明,数字护理是一种个人实践,数字技术是静态参与者。这带有技术确定性推理的明显标志。我们的民族志研究展示了老年人数字护理的持续性和集体性。当政策与日常实践不一致时,就存在将用户群体排除在外的风险。我们认为,政府政策中的社会技术方法有助于实现重要的社会目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Ongoing and Collective Character of Digital Care for Older People: Moving Beyond Techno-Determinism in Government Policy
ABSTRACT In this article, we contrast policy understandings of digital care with older people’s day-to-day digital care. In doing so, we discuss problems relating to deterministic approaches in government policy. Our policy analysis shows that digital care is articulated as an individual practice, and digital technologies as static actors. This bears clear marks of techno-deterministic reasoning. Our ethnographic study demonstrates the ongoing and collective character of older people’s digital care. When policy is not aligned with everyday practice, there is a risk of excluding groups of users. We argue that a socio-technical approach in government policy could contribute to achieving important societal goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed, refereed journal explores the potentials of computer and telecommunications technologies in mental health, developmental disability, welfare, addictions, education, and other human services. The Journal of Technology in Human Services covers the full range of technological applications, including direct service techniques. It not only provides the necessary historical perspectives on the use of computers in the human service field, but it also presents articles that will improve your technology literacy and keep you abreast of state-of-the-art developments.
期刊最新文献
Development of the Mobile Application to Prevent Suicide (MAPS), a Personalized Smartphone App for Suicide Prevention: Feedback from Individual Interviews Online Employment Services for Immigrant Professionals: An Environmental Scan Experiences of Older Adult Volunteers and Nursing Simulation Coordinators in a Graduate-Level Primary Care Telehealth Simulation: Benefits, Facilitators, and Volunteer Management Considerations The Use of Online Medical Record Functionalities in Older Adulthood: The Role of Use Encouragement and Access Frequency An Information Acquisition Approach on How Young Adults Search for Mental Health Professionals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1