皮林:一个剑客家族

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES Arms & Armour Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1080/17416124.2021.1973779
J. Elstob
{"title":"皮林:一个剑客家族","authors":"J. Elstob","doi":"10.1080/17416124.2021.1973779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To many with an interest in British military swords the name of Pillin will be very familiar. Yet, for a firm which traded for at least 65 years there is little information available about its activities beyond a few bare dates and addresses often quoted from the same sources. The original source of much of this information is unclear and some of this now appears questionable. In writing this article my intention is to provide a more comprehensive account of the Pillin dynasty. By examining what new evidence may be available I hope to evaluate and revise contemporary wisdom regarding Pillin’s operations. In conducting this research during a global Covid-19 pandemic, amid national and local lockdowns, I am restricted in source material but have relied heavily on sources available online. Such methodology carries its own risks, there are gaps in the available datasets and frustratingly, transcription errors can both hamper searches and offer false positive matches. Nevertheless, with the rise in popularity of ancestry research, new data sources are constantly being made available. In today’s world of social media and online resources we have ready access to data of which researchers even 15 years ago could only have dreamed. Information regarding sword cutlers, such as their trading dates and addresses, is of particular interest as it can help to correctly date a sword. This in turn can assist with identifying an original owner. In the case of British blades, etched with the owner’s initials or a family crest, cross referencing with the Army lists will often provide multiple possible candidates over the lifetime of a sword pattern. Accurately identifying the year of manufacture can significantly assist in narrowing the field of potential matches against any one set of initials. A desire to identify the original owners of some of my own collected swords, and to assist others to do the same, provided the seed of motivation for my research into the Pillin dynasty. I hope this article provides a useful platform for additional research.","PeriodicalId":40914,"journal":{"name":"Arms & Armour","volume":"18 1","pages":"208 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pillin: A Family of Sword Cutlers\",\"authors\":\"J. Elstob\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17416124.2021.1973779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To many with an interest in British military swords the name of Pillin will be very familiar. Yet, for a firm which traded for at least 65 years there is little information available about its activities beyond a few bare dates and addresses often quoted from the same sources. The original source of much of this information is unclear and some of this now appears questionable. In writing this article my intention is to provide a more comprehensive account of the Pillin dynasty. By examining what new evidence may be available I hope to evaluate and revise contemporary wisdom regarding Pillin’s operations. In conducting this research during a global Covid-19 pandemic, amid national and local lockdowns, I am restricted in source material but have relied heavily on sources available online. Such methodology carries its own risks, there are gaps in the available datasets and frustratingly, transcription errors can both hamper searches and offer false positive matches. Nevertheless, with the rise in popularity of ancestry research, new data sources are constantly being made available. In today’s world of social media and online resources we have ready access to data of which researchers even 15 years ago could only have dreamed. Information regarding sword cutlers, such as their trading dates and addresses, is of particular interest as it can help to correctly date a sword. This in turn can assist with identifying an original owner. In the case of British blades, etched with the owner’s initials or a family crest, cross referencing with the Army lists will often provide multiple possible candidates over the lifetime of a sword pattern. Accurately identifying the year of manufacture can significantly assist in narrowing the field of potential matches against any one set of initials. A desire to identify the original owners of some of my own collected swords, and to assist others to do the same, provided the seed of motivation for my research into the Pillin dynasty. I hope this article provides a useful platform for additional research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arms & Armour\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"208 - 223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arms & Armour\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17416124.2021.1973779\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arms & Armour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17416124.2021.1973779","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于许多对英国军刀感兴趣的人来说,皮林的名字将非常熟悉。然而,对于一家交易价格至少为65英镑的公司来说 多年来,除了经常从同一来源引用的几个简单日期和地址外,几乎没有关于其活动的信息。这些信息的最初来源尚不清楚,其中一些现在似乎有问题。写这篇文章的目的是提供一个更全面的描述皮林王朝。通过研究可能获得的新证据,我希望评估和修正当代关于皮林手术的智慧。在全球新冠肺炎大流行期间,在国家和地方封锁期间,我进行这项研究时,材料来源受到限制,但严重依赖在线资源。这种方法有其自身的风险,可用的数据集存在漏洞,令人沮丧的是,转录错误既会阻碍搜索,也会提供假阳性匹配。尽管如此,随着祖先研究的普及,新的数据来源也在不断提供。在当今社交媒体和在线资源的世界里,我们可以随时访问研究人员甚至15 几年前只能梦想。关于剑切割者的信息,如他们的交易日期和地址,尤其令人感兴趣,因为它可以帮助正确地确定剑的日期。这反过来可以帮助识别原始所有者。就刻有所有者姓名首字母或家族徽章的英国刀片而言,与陆军名单的交叉引用通常会在剑型的一生中提供多种可能的候选者。准确识别制造年份可以大大有助于缩小与任何一组首字母的潜在匹配范围。我想确定我自己收藏的一些剑的原始所有者,并帮助其他人这样做,这为我研究皮林王朝提供了动力。我希望这篇文章能为进一步的研究提供一个有用的平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pillin: A Family of Sword Cutlers
To many with an interest in British military swords the name of Pillin will be very familiar. Yet, for a firm which traded for at least 65 years there is little information available about its activities beyond a few bare dates and addresses often quoted from the same sources. The original source of much of this information is unclear and some of this now appears questionable. In writing this article my intention is to provide a more comprehensive account of the Pillin dynasty. By examining what new evidence may be available I hope to evaluate and revise contemporary wisdom regarding Pillin’s operations. In conducting this research during a global Covid-19 pandemic, amid national and local lockdowns, I am restricted in source material but have relied heavily on sources available online. Such methodology carries its own risks, there are gaps in the available datasets and frustratingly, transcription errors can both hamper searches and offer false positive matches. Nevertheless, with the rise in popularity of ancestry research, new data sources are constantly being made available. In today’s world of social media and online resources we have ready access to data of which researchers even 15 years ago could only have dreamed. Information regarding sword cutlers, such as their trading dates and addresses, is of particular interest as it can help to correctly date a sword. This in turn can assist with identifying an original owner. In the case of British blades, etched with the owner’s initials or a family crest, cross referencing with the Army lists will often provide multiple possible candidates over the lifetime of a sword pattern. Accurately identifying the year of manufacture can significantly assist in narrowing the field of potential matches against any one set of initials. A desire to identify the original owners of some of my own collected swords, and to assist others to do the same, provided the seed of motivation for my research into the Pillin dynasty. I hope this article provides a useful platform for additional research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arms & Armour
Arms & Armour MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Accelerator guns: from ‘Cannon Perreaux’ to V.3 Up is down: some hypotheses on how to interpret perspective in MS I.33’s illustrations Abraham Charles Kirkmann, lawyer and antiquary; and the rediscovery of the Bosworth stonebow at Browsholme Hall Update: Martini-type rifle production in Afghanistan A Cultural History of the Medieval Sword: Power, Piety and Play
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1