开发白三叶草干物质产量的基因组选择

Q3 Environmental Science Journal of New Zealand Grasslands Pub Date : 2022-02-02 DOI:10.33584/jnzg.2021.83.3502
A. Griffiths, Grace Ehoche, S. Arojju, Anna Larking, R. Jáuregui, G. Cousins, J. O’Connor, Z. Jahufer
{"title":"开发白三叶草干物质产量的基因组选择","authors":"A. Griffiths, Grace Ehoche, S. Arojju, Anna Larking, R. Jáuregui, G. Cousins, J. O’Connor, Z. Jahufer","doi":"10.33584/jnzg.2021.83.3502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Genomic selection (GS) integrates DNA marker and trait data to develop a model that enables prediction of trait performance (genomic-estimated breeding values; GEBVs) based on genotype data alone. GS has been shown to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of breeding programmes, especially for complex traits such dry matter yield (DMY). DMY data were generated from a training population of 200 white clover half-sibling (HS) families assessed in multi-location field trials for two years. We generated a GS prediction model after integrating genotyping-by-sequencing marker data from parents of the HS families with the HS DMY data. We then compared two selection strategies: a conventional method where individuals were chosen randomly from the phenotypically top-ranked HS families (HSP); and another where GEBVs were used to select the best individual from the top-ranked HS families (APWFGS). The mean predicted DMY GEBVs of the selected plants, as well as the predicted response to selection, were compared with those of the base population. This study showed that, compared with conventional selection (HSP), incorporating genomic selection (APWGSHS) is predicted to double the increase in DMY and response to selection relative to the base population. Synthetic populations based on these selections have been generated and will be tested in a field trial to determine empirically the impact of genomic selection for a complex trait.","PeriodicalId":36573,"journal":{"name":"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing genomic selection for dry matter yield in white clover\",\"authors\":\"A. Griffiths, Grace Ehoche, S. Arojju, Anna Larking, R. Jáuregui, G. Cousins, J. O’Connor, Z. Jahufer\",\"doi\":\"10.33584/jnzg.2021.83.3502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Genomic selection (GS) integrates DNA marker and trait data to develop a model that enables prediction of trait performance (genomic-estimated breeding values; GEBVs) based on genotype data alone. GS has been shown to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of breeding programmes, especially for complex traits such dry matter yield (DMY). DMY data were generated from a training population of 200 white clover half-sibling (HS) families assessed in multi-location field trials for two years. We generated a GS prediction model after integrating genotyping-by-sequencing marker data from parents of the HS families with the HS DMY data. We then compared two selection strategies: a conventional method where individuals were chosen randomly from the phenotypically top-ranked HS families (HSP); and another where GEBVs were used to select the best individual from the top-ranked HS families (APWFGS). The mean predicted DMY GEBVs of the selected plants, as well as the predicted response to selection, were compared with those of the base population. This study showed that, compared with conventional selection (HSP), incorporating genomic selection (APWGSHS) is predicted to double the increase in DMY and response to selection relative to the base population. Synthetic populations based on these selections have been generated and will be tested in a field trial to determine empirically the impact of genomic selection for a complex trait.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2021.83.3502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of New Zealand Grasslands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33584/jnzg.2021.83.3502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基因组选择(GS)整合了DNA标记和性状数据,开发了一个模型,该模型能够单独基于基因型数据预测性状表现(基因组估计育种值;GEBVs)。GS已被证明可以提高育种计划的效率和有效性,尤其是对干物质产量(DMY)等复杂性状。DMY数据是从200个白三叶草同父异母(HS)家庭的训练群体中生成的,这些家庭在两年的多地点实地试验中进行了评估。我们通过测序HS家族父母的标记数据和HS DMY数据整合基因分型后,生成了GS预测模型。然后,我们比较了两种选择策略:一种传统的方法,从表型最高的HS家族(HSP)中随机选择个体;另一种是使用GEBVs从排名靠前的HS家族中选择最佳个体(APWFGS)。将所选植物的平均预测DMY GEBVs以及对选择的预测响应与基本群体的预测响应进行比较。这项研究表明,与传统选择(HSP)相比,结合基因组选择(APWGSHS)预计将使DMY和对选择的反应相对于基础群体增加一倍。基于这些选择的合成群体已经产生,并将在实地试验中进行测试,以根据经验确定基因组选择对复杂性状的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing genomic selection for dry matter yield in white clover
Genomic selection (GS) integrates DNA marker and trait data to develop a model that enables prediction of trait performance (genomic-estimated breeding values; GEBVs) based on genotype data alone. GS has been shown to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of breeding programmes, especially for complex traits such dry matter yield (DMY). DMY data were generated from a training population of 200 white clover half-sibling (HS) families assessed in multi-location field trials for two years. We generated a GS prediction model after integrating genotyping-by-sequencing marker data from parents of the HS families with the HS DMY data. We then compared two selection strategies: a conventional method where individuals were chosen randomly from the phenotypically top-ranked HS families (HSP); and another where GEBVs were used to select the best individual from the top-ranked HS families (APWFGS). The mean predicted DMY GEBVs of the selected plants, as well as the predicted response to selection, were compared with those of the base population. This study showed that, compared with conventional selection (HSP), incorporating genomic selection (APWGSHS) is predicted to double the increase in DMY and response to selection relative to the base population. Synthetic populations based on these selections have been generated and will be tested in a field trial to determine empirically the impact of genomic selection for a complex trait.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands
Journal of New Zealand Grasslands Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Legume yield and persistence when sown in grass and herb pasture mixes in Lees Valley, South Island High Country Māori cultural values and soil fertility management – an exploratory study An assessment of the agronomic effectiveness of N‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (nBTPT) - treated urea on the production of clover-based pastures, pastures, grasses and crops. Using leaf regrowth stage to define defoliation interval for diverse pastures of complementary species (Lolium perenne L., Bromus valdivianus Phil., Dactylis glomerata L. and Trifolium repens L.) Five-year old diversified pasture delivers greater lamb liveweight gain than a standard perennial ryegrass-white clover pasture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1