脊髓损伤患者弹性应对类型的潜在类别分析

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin Pub Date : 2021-02-03 DOI:10.1177/0034355221990736
C. Chiu, Jessica M. Brooks, Alicia Jones, Kortney Wilcher, S. Shen, S. Driver, James S. Krause
{"title":"脊髓损伤患者弹性应对类型的潜在类别分析","authors":"C. Chiu, Jessica M. Brooks, Alicia Jones, Kortney Wilcher, S. Shen, S. Driver, James S. Krause","doi":"10.1177/0034355221990736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resilience is central to living well with a spinal cord injury (SCI). To provide a timely, targeted, and individualized intervention supporting resilience, it is necessary to assess an individual’s resilience level and characteristics of resilience on an ongoing basis. We aimed to validate the different types of resilient coping among people with SCI (PwSCI), using the Connor–Davidson resilience scale, and to identify the relationships between resilience and other psychosocial factors among the types of resilient coping. We recruited 93 PwSCI, who took the self-report measures of resilience, depression, life satisfaction, and spirituality. Using latent class analysis, we found three types: (a) goal-pursuing, bouncing-back, and persevering, named GP; (b) uncertainty about coping with setbacks, named UC; and (c) loss of resilient coping, named LOSS. The multivariate tests indicated that the three types differed on a linear combination of resilience, depression, and life satisfaction, with a large effect size. We discuss the three types of resilient coping and the implications for psychosocial interventions. We also recommend that rehabilitation clinicians examine PwSCI’s resilience levels and types of resilience during initial and follow-up visits. In doing so, PwSCI will have timely, targeted supports for developing and/or re-building their resilience.","PeriodicalId":47012,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","volume":"65 1","pages":"213 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0034355221990736","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilient Coping Types in People With Spinal Cord Injury: Latent Class Analysis\",\"authors\":\"C. Chiu, Jessica M. Brooks, Alicia Jones, Kortney Wilcher, S. Shen, S. Driver, James S. Krause\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0034355221990736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Resilience is central to living well with a spinal cord injury (SCI). To provide a timely, targeted, and individualized intervention supporting resilience, it is necessary to assess an individual’s resilience level and characteristics of resilience on an ongoing basis. We aimed to validate the different types of resilient coping among people with SCI (PwSCI), using the Connor–Davidson resilience scale, and to identify the relationships between resilience and other psychosocial factors among the types of resilient coping. We recruited 93 PwSCI, who took the self-report measures of resilience, depression, life satisfaction, and spirituality. Using latent class analysis, we found three types: (a) goal-pursuing, bouncing-back, and persevering, named GP; (b) uncertainty about coping with setbacks, named UC; and (c) loss of resilient coping, named LOSS. The multivariate tests indicated that the three types differed on a linear combination of resilience, depression, and life satisfaction, with a large effect size. We discuss the three types of resilient coping and the implications for psychosocial interventions. We also recommend that rehabilitation clinicians examine PwSCI’s resilience levels and types of resilience during initial and follow-up visits. In doing so, PwSCI will have timely, targeted supports for developing and/or re-building their resilience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"213 - 222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0034355221990736\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355221990736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355221990736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

恢复力是脊髓损伤患者良好生活的核心。为了提供及时、有针对性和个性化的干预措施来支持恢复力,有必要持续评估个人的恢复力水平和恢复力特征。我们旨在使用Connor–Davidson复原力量表验证SCI患者(PwSCI)中不同类型的复原力应对,并确定复原力与其他心理社会因素之间的关系。我们招募了93名PwSCI,他们进行了韧性、抑郁、生活满意度和精神方面的自我报告。运用潜类分析,我们发现了三种类型:(a)追求目标、反弹和坚持,称为GP;(b) 应对挫折的不确定性,命名为UC;以及(c)弹性应对措施的损失,称为损失。多变量测试表明,这三种类型在恢复力、抑郁和生活满意度的线性组合上存在差异,影响大小较大。我们讨论了三种类型的弹性应对以及对心理社会干预的影响。我们还建议康复临床医生在初次和随访期间检查PwSCI的恢复力水平和恢复力类型。通过这样做,普华永道国际将为发展和/或重建其复原力提供及时、有针对性的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resilient Coping Types in People With Spinal Cord Injury: Latent Class Analysis
Resilience is central to living well with a spinal cord injury (SCI). To provide a timely, targeted, and individualized intervention supporting resilience, it is necessary to assess an individual’s resilience level and characteristics of resilience on an ongoing basis. We aimed to validate the different types of resilient coping among people with SCI (PwSCI), using the Connor–Davidson resilience scale, and to identify the relationships between resilience and other psychosocial factors among the types of resilient coping. We recruited 93 PwSCI, who took the self-report measures of resilience, depression, life satisfaction, and spirituality. Using latent class analysis, we found three types: (a) goal-pursuing, bouncing-back, and persevering, named GP; (b) uncertainty about coping with setbacks, named UC; and (c) loss of resilient coping, named LOSS. The multivariate tests indicated that the three types differed on a linear combination of resilience, depression, and life satisfaction, with a large effect size. We discuss the three types of resilient coping and the implications for psychosocial interventions. We also recommend that rehabilitation clinicians examine PwSCI’s resilience levels and types of resilience during initial and follow-up visits. In doing so, PwSCI will have timely, targeted supports for developing and/or re-building their resilience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin (RCB) publishes articles on rehabilitation counseling with a major emphasis on data-based research reports, although other types of contributions to professional knowledge in rehabilitation counseling will be considered. Examples include articles that explain an innovative technique or application, point/ counterpoint debates on a current controversy challenging the profession, or insightful essays on an important issue. Contributions of these kinds may be considered for a special section of RCB. Article topics cover a wide range—from ethical dilemmas related to counseling clients with HIV/AIDS to clinical problem solving in micro–case management.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric Validation of the PROMIS Social Support Scale in a Sample of Individuals With Chronic Health Conditions and Disabilities: A Factor Analytic Study Family Perspectives on Promoting Paid Employment for Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Continuing Education Answer Sheet For Volume 67, No 2 Attachment, Relationships, Academic Problems, and Negative Emotions in Student Veterans With Disabilities Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale: Translation, Reliability, and Validation Study of the Turkish Version
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1