C. Oliveira, O. C. Moreira, D. Matos, Mauro L Mazini-Filho, S. Silva, E. T. Pereira, S. C. Franceschini, Nádia S L Silva, L. Doimo
{"title":"55岁以上女性腹部测试成绩分析:人体测量和灵活性的影响","authors":"C. Oliveira, O. C. Moreira, D. Matos, Mauro L Mazini-Filho, S. Silva, E. T. Pereira, S. C. Franceschini, Nádia S L Silva, L. Doimo","doi":"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of anthropometric variables and flexibility on the performance of women aged 55+ years on abdominal test protocols. The sample was composed by 20 physically active volunteers, aged 55 years (median 61), who were participants in gymnastic activities program. Each volunteer performed two abdominal tests: partial trunk flexion with a 7.6 cm sliding of the hands (P1) and partial flexion of the trunk with the hands on the thighs (P2), both executed with the feet resting on the ground. For analysis, the number of correct executions (final position) was considered in each test, as recommended by the authors. Measurements of body mass, flexibility, height, waist and hip perimeters, subjective perception of exertion, and calculations of body mass index and waist-hip ratio were performed. The perception of abdominal effort, and discomfort or pain in the cervical and lumbar region were also evaluated. The results showed that there were no statistically significant associations between the analyzed indicators (Age: P1: rs = -0.024, p = 0.916; P2: rs = -0.194, p = 0.407; BMI: P1: rs =-0.064, p = 0.792; P2: rs = -0.235, p= 0.327; Waist Circumference: P1: rs = -0.143, p = 0.563; P2: rs = 0.027, p = 0.908; Flexibility: r s= -0.327, p = 0.169; P2: rs = 0.0009, p = 0.991; Hip waist ratio: P1: rs = -0.209, p = 0.371; P2: rs = 0.217, p = 0.353) and the performance on the tests. In addition, 35% of the participants made valid attempts on P1 while 45% produced at least one valid attempt on P2. It was concluded that both abdominal tests were adequate for the studied sample and they can be applied to adult and elderly women to assess their abdominal musculature.","PeriodicalId":38936,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance analysis of women over 55 years on abdominal tests: impact of anthropometry and flexibility\",\"authors\":\"C. Oliveira, O. C. Moreira, D. Matos, Mauro L Mazini-Filho, S. Silva, E. T. Pereira, S. C. Franceschini, Nádia S L Silva, L. Doimo\",\"doi\":\"10.18176/archmeddeporte.00076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of anthropometric variables and flexibility on the performance of women aged 55+ years on abdominal test protocols. The sample was composed by 20 physically active volunteers, aged 55 years (median 61), who were participants in gymnastic activities program. Each volunteer performed two abdominal tests: partial trunk flexion with a 7.6 cm sliding of the hands (P1) and partial flexion of the trunk with the hands on the thighs (P2), both executed with the feet resting on the ground. For analysis, the number of correct executions (final position) was considered in each test, as recommended by the authors. Measurements of body mass, flexibility, height, waist and hip perimeters, subjective perception of exertion, and calculations of body mass index and waist-hip ratio were performed. The perception of abdominal effort, and discomfort or pain in the cervical and lumbar region were also evaluated. The results showed that there were no statistically significant associations between the analyzed indicators (Age: P1: rs = -0.024, p = 0.916; P2: rs = -0.194, p = 0.407; BMI: P1: rs =-0.064, p = 0.792; P2: rs = -0.235, p= 0.327; Waist Circumference: P1: rs = -0.143, p = 0.563; P2: rs = 0.027, p = 0.908; Flexibility: r s= -0.327, p = 0.169; P2: rs = 0.0009, p = 0.991; Hip waist ratio: P1: rs = -0.209, p = 0.371; P2: rs = 0.217, p = 0.353) and the performance on the tests. In addition, 35% of the participants made valid attempts on P1 while 45% produced at least one valid attempt on P2. It was concluded that both abdominal tests were adequate for the studied sample and they can be applied to adult and elderly women to assess their abdominal musculature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de Medicina del Deporte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18176/archmeddeporte.00076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是评估人体测量变量和灵活性对55岁以上女性腹部测试方案表现的影响。样本由20名身体活跃的志愿者组成,年龄55岁(中位数61岁),他们参加了体操活动项目。每个志愿者都进行了两项腹部测试:躯干部分弯曲,手滑动7.6厘米(P1);躯干部分弯曲,手放在大腿上(P2),两项测试都是在脚放在地面上的情况下进行的。为了进行分析,按照作者的建议,在每个测试中考虑正确执行的次数(最终位置)。测量体重、柔韧性、身高、腰臀围、主观用力感觉,计算体重指数和腰臀比。腹部用力的感觉,以及颈椎和腰椎区域的不适或疼痛也进行了评估。结果显示,各分析指标间无统计学意义的相关性(年龄:P1: rs = -0.024, p = 0.916;P2: rs = -0.194, p = 0.407;BMI: P1: rs =-0.064, p = 0.792;P2: rs = -0.235, p= 0.327;腰围:P1: rs = -0.143, p = 0.563;P2: rs = 0.027, p = 0.908;灵活性:r s= -0.327, p = 0.169;P2: rs = 0.0009, p = 0.991;臀腰比:P1: rs = -0.209, p = 0.371;P2: rs = 0.217, p = 0.353)和测试性能。此外,35%的参与者在P1上做出了有效尝试,而45%的参与者在P2上至少做出了一次有效尝试。结论是,这两种腹部测试对所研究的样本都是足够的,它们可以应用于成年和老年妇女,以评估她们的腹部肌肉组织。
Performance analysis of women over 55 years on abdominal tests: impact of anthropometry and flexibility
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of anthropometric variables and flexibility on the performance of women aged 55+ years on abdominal test protocols. The sample was composed by 20 physically active volunteers, aged 55 years (median 61), who were participants in gymnastic activities program. Each volunteer performed two abdominal tests: partial trunk flexion with a 7.6 cm sliding of the hands (P1) and partial flexion of the trunk with the hands on the thighs (P2), both executed with the feet resting on the ground. For analysis, the number of correct executions (final position) was considered in each test, as recommended by the authors. Measurements of body mass, flexibility, height, waist and hip perimeters, subjective perception of exertion, and calculations of body mass index and waist-hip ratio were performed. The perception of abdominal effort, and discomfort or pain in the cervical and lumbar region were also evaluated. The results showed that there were no statistically significant associations between the analyzed indicators (Age: P1: rs = -0.024, p = 0.916; P2: rs = -0.194, p = 0.407; BMI: P1: rs =-0.064, p = 0.792; P2: rs = -0.235, p= 0.327; Waist Circumference: P1: rs = -0.143, p = 0.563; P2: rs = 0.027, p = 0.908; Flexibility: r s= -0.327, p = 0.169; P2: rs = 0.0009, p = 0.991; Hip waist ratio: P1: rs = -0.209, p = 0.371; P2: rs = 0.217, p = 0.353) and the performance on the tests. In addition, 35% of the participants made valid attempts on P1 while 45% produced at least one valid attempt on P2. It was concluded that both abdominal tests were adequate for the studied sample and they can be applied to adult and elderly women to assess their abdominal musculature.