社会选择问题中的扭曲

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS ACM SIGecom Exchanges Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1145/3476436.3476439
Elliot Anshelevich, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Nisarg Shah, Alexandros A. Voudouris
{"title":"社会选择问题中的扭曲","authors":"Elliot Anshelevich, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Nisarg Shah, Alexandros A. Voudouris","doi":"10.1145/3476436.3476439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of distortion in social choice problems has been defined to measure the loss in efficiency---typically measured by the utilitarian social welfare, the sum of utilities of the participating agents---due to having access only to limited information about the preferences of the agents. Here, we provide a comprehensive reading list on the related literature.","PeriodicalId":56237,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGecom Exchanges","volume":"19 1","pages":"12 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3476436.3476439","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distortion in social choice problems\",\"authors\":\"Elliot Anshelevich, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Nisarg Shah, Alexandros A. Voudouris\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3476436.3476439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of distortion in social choice problems has been defined to measure the loss in efficiency---typically measured by the utilitarian social welfare, the sum of utilities of the participating agents---due to having access only to limited information about the preferences of the agents. Here, we provide a comprehensive reading list on the related literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGecom Exchanges\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1145/3476436.3476439\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGecom Exchanges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3476436.3476439\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGecom Exchanges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3476436.3476439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

社会选择问题中的扭曲概念被定义为衡量效率的损失——通常通过功利主义的社会福利来衡量,即参与主体的效用之和——因为只能获得关于主体偏好的有限信息。在这里,我们提供了一份关于相关文献的全面阅读清单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distortion in social choice problems
The notion of distortion in social choice problems has been defined to measure the loss in efficiency---typically measured by the utilitarian social welfare, the sum of utilities of the participating agents---due to having access only to limited information about the preferences of the agents. Here, we provide a comprehensive reading list on the related literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM SIGecom Exchanges
ACM SIGecom Exchanges COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economics and computation meets cognitive biases Spillover effects in online field experiments Fairness and equity in resource allocation and decision-making On modeling human perceptions of allocation policies with uncertain outcomes Analyzing data with systematic bias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1