西班牙进步派关于第十二届立法机构性别辩论的话语中的词汇选择和概念框架(2016-2019)

Q2 Social Sciences Textos en Proceso Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.17710/tep.2021.7.2.6gonzalezgomez
Carmen González Gómez
{"title":"西班牙进步派关于第十二届立法机构性别辩论的话语中的词汇选择和概念框架(2016-2019)","authors":"Carmen González Gómez","doi":"10.17710/tep.2021.7.2.6gonzalezgomez","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the parliamentary discourse on gender equality made by PSOE and Unidos Podemos during the XII legislature (2016-2019). The research is based on a corpus made up of 77,828 words extracted from the thirty plenary debates that addressed issues related to gender equality during the XII legislature. The study combines the quantitative and qualitative perspectives to analyze whether there are asymmetries in the use of terms such as feminism, equality, cuidados or machismo. The analysis of the use of 31 lexical items shows that there are differences between the two parties, and that Unidos Podemos is the one that most frequently uses this kind of terms. This quantitative approach is completed with a qualitative study that analyzes which frames activate these words. The objective of this research is to give an account of how progressive political parties use the main terms in vogue in debates about gender equality. The main goal is, therefore, to see how ideology influences the lexical selection of political discourse.","PeriodicalId":36069,"journal":{"name":"Textos en Proceso","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selección léxica y encuadre conceptual en el discurso de los progresistas españoles respecto a los debates de género de la XII legislatura (2016-2019)\",\"authors\":\"Carmen González Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.17710/tep.2021.7.2.6gonzalezgomez\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study analyzes the parliamentary discourse on gender equality made by PSOE and Unidos Podemos during the XII legislature (2016-2019). The research is based on a corpus made up of 77,828 words extracted from the thirty plenary debates that addressed issues related to gender equality during the XII legislature. The study combines the quantitative and qualitative perspectives to analyze whether there are asymmetries in the use of terms such as feminism, equality, cuidados or machismo. The analysis of the use of 31 lexical items shows that there are differences between the two parties, and that Unidos Podemos is the one that most frequently uses this kind of terms. This quantitative approach is completed with a qualitative study that analyzes which frames activate these words. The objective of this research is to give an account of how progressive political parties use the main terms in vogue in debates about gender equality. The main goal is, therefore, to see how ideology influences the lexical selection of political discourse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Textos en Proceso\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Textos en Proceso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17710/tep.2021.7.2.6gonzalezgomez\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textos en Proceso","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17710/tep.2021.7.2.6gonzalezgomez","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了PSOE和Unidos Podemos在第十二届立法会(2016-2019年)期间关于性别平等的议会话语。这项研究基于一个由77828个单词组成的语料库,这些单词是从第十二届立法会期间涉及性别平等问题的30场全体辩论中提取的。本研究结合定量和定性的视角来分析女性主义、平等、cuidados或大男子主义等术语的使用是否存在不对称。对31个词条的使用分析表明,双方之间存在差异,Unidos Podemos是使用此类术语最多的一个。这种定量方法是通过定性研究来完成的,该研究分析了哪些框架激活了这些单词。本研究的目的是说明进步政党如何在关于性别平等的辩论中使用流行的主要术语。因此,主要目的是观察意识形态如何影响政治话语的词汇选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Selección léxica y encuadre conceptual en el discurso de los progresistas españoles respecto a los debates de género de la XII legislatura (2016-2019)
This study analyzes the parliamentary discourse on gender equality made by PSOE and Unidos Podemos during the XII legislature (2016-2019). The research is based on a corpus made up of 77,828 words extracted from the thirty plenary debates that addressed issues related to gender equality during the XII legislature. The study combines the quantitative and qualitative perspectives to analyze whether there are asymmetries in the use of terms such as feminism, equality, cuidados or machismo. The analysis of the use of 31 lexical items shows that there are differences between the two parties, and that Unidos Podemos is the one that most frequently uses this kind of terms. This quantitative approach is completed with a qualitative study that analyzes which frames activate these words. The objective of this research is to give an account of how progressive political parties use the main terms in vogue in debates about gender equality. The main goal is, therefore, to see how ideology influences the lexical selection of political discourse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Textos en Proceso
Textos en Proceso Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hechos destacados de la semana 23 de febrero al 8 de marzo Discurso de Diana Marcela Contreras, graduada de la Escuela de Formación Política y Ciudadana (2022) No paran las amenazas al medio ambiente Hasta que la dignidad se haga costumbre etapas del régimen híbrido
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1