{"title":"企业刑事责任:走向合规导向","authors":"G. Jiménez","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.26.1.0353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Under U.S. federal law, a corporation can be held criminally liable for the crimes of its employees and agents. The Department of Justice's U.S. Attorneys' Manual lays out a list of factors prosecutors can evaluate when deciding whether or not to prosecute a corporate entity. The Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors have various tools at their disposal, including deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) and non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) as alternatives to going to trial. Prosecutors have used DPAs and NPAs in recent cases, allowing the government to ensure that corporate entities comply with investigations, enact compliance programs, and continue to follow laws and regulations. The use of DPAs and NPAs are on the rise, and these agreements are now used in cases concerning the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the U.S. Commodity Future Trading Commission (CFTC). Comments from the Trump Administration suggest that these agreements will continue to be used to deter corporate criminal misconduct. Many Latin American countries have recently enacted laws to impose corporate criminal liability and use some type of compliance-based program to help deter future wrongdoing. Mexico, in particular, has recently amended its Federal Penal Code to prosecute and punish corporate entities. Since the Mexican case law in this area is still developing, it is very important that Mexico adopt deferred prosecution agreements, non-prosecution agreements, or a variation thereof that require compliance programs to enhance the public perception of the Mexican government and the judiciary. Mexico is just one of many countries amending its laws, suggesting a shift toward an implied understanding of the importance of a compliance-oriented approach. Foreign jurisdictions and the U.S. DOJ continue to enact programs to help regulate laws and deter criminal activity in many industries. The acceptance of the corporate criminal liability doctrine in several jurisdictions promotes the public interest and the integrity of the legal system, deters future illegal activity, and helps ensure corporate compliance with the law.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"353 - 379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Criminal Liability: Toward a Compliance-Orientated Approach\",\"authors\":\"G. Jiménez\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.26.1.0353\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Under U.S. federal law, a corporation can be held criminally liable for the crimes of its employees and agents. The Department of Justice's U.S. Attorneys' Manual lays out a list of factors prosecutors can evaluate when deciding whether or not to prosecute a corporate entity. The Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors have various tools at their disposal, including deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) and non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) as alternatives to going to trial. Prosecutors have used DPAs and NPAs in recent cases, allowing the government to ensure that corporate entities comply with investigations, enact compliance programs, and continue to follow laws and regulations. The use of DPAs and NPAs are on the rise, and these agreements are now used in cases concerning the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the U.S. Commodity Future Trading Commission (CFTC). Comments from the Trump Administration suggest that these agreements will continue to be used to deter corporate criminal misconduct. Many Latin American countries have recently enacted laws to impose corporate criminal liability and use some type of compliance-based program to help deter future wrongdoing. Mexico, in particular, has recently amended its Federal Penal Code to prosecute and punish corporate entities. Since the Mexican case law in this area is still developing, it is very important that Mexico adopt deferred prosecution agreements, non-prosecution agreements, or a variation thereof that require compliance programs to enhance the public perception of the Mexican government and the judiciary. Mexico is just one of many countries amending its laws, suggesting a shift toward an implied understanding of the importance of a compliance-oriented approach. Foreign jurisdictions and the U.S. DOJ continue to enact programs to help regulate laws and deter criminal activity in many industries. The acceptance of the corporate criminal liability doctrine in several jurisdictions promotes the public interest and the integrity of the legal system, deters future illegal activity, and helps ensure corporate compliance with the law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"353 - 379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.26.1.0353\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.26.1.0353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
摘要:根据美国联邦法律,公司对其雇员和代理人的犯罪行为负有刑事责任。美国司法部(Department of Justice)的《美国检察官手册》(U.S. Attorneys’Manual)列出了检察官在决定是否起诉一家公司实体时可以评估的一系列因素。司法部(DOJ)检察官可以使用各种工具,包括延期起诉协议(dpa)和不起诉协议(npa),作为审判的替代方案。检察官在最近的案件中使用了dppa和npa,使政府能够确保企业实体遵守调查,制定合规计划,并继续遵守法律法规。dpa和npa的使用正在增加,这些协议现在被用于涉及《反海外腐败法》(FCPA)和美国商品期货交易委员会(CFTC)的案件中。特朗普政府的评论表明,这些协议将继续用于遏制企业犯罪行为。许多拉丁美洲国家最近颁布了法律,要求企业承担刑事责任,并利用某种基于合规的计划来帮助阻止未来的不法行为。特别是墨西哥最近修订了其联邦刑法,以起诉和惩罚公司实体。由于墨西哥在这一领域的判例法仍在发展中,墨西哥采用延期起诉协议、不起诉协议或其变体是非常重要的,这些协议要求遵守程序,以提高公众对墨西哥政府和司法机构的认识。墨西哥只是许多修改法律的国家之一,这表明人们对以合规为导向的方法的重要性有了一种隐含的理解。外国司法管辖区和美国司法部继续制定项目,以帮助规范许多行业的法律和阻止犯罪活动。一些司法管辖区对公司刑事责任原则的接受促进了公共利益和法律制度的完整性,阻止了未来的非法活动,并有助于确保公司遵守法律。
Corporate Criminal Liability: Toward a Compliance-Orientated Approach
ABSTRACT:Under U.S. federal law, a corporation can be held criminally liable for the crimes of its employees and agents. The Department of Justice's U.S. Attorneys' Manual lays out a list of factors prosecutors can evaluate when deciding whether or not to prosecute a corporate entity. The Department of Justice (DOJ) prosecutors have various tools at their disposal, including deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) and non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) as alternatives to going to trial. Prosecutors have used DPAs and NPAs in recent cases, allowing the government to ensure that corporate entities comply with investigations, enact compliance programs, and continue to follow laws and regulations. The use of DPAs and NPAs are on the rise, and these agreements are now used in cases concerning the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and the U.S. Commodity Future Trading Commission (CFTC). Comments from the Trump Administration suggest that these agreements will continue to be used to deter corporate criminal misconduct. Many Latin American countries have recently enacted laws to impose corporate criminal liability and use some type of compliance-based program to help deter future wrongdoing. Mexico, in particular, has recently amended its Federal Penal Code to prosecute and punish corporate entities. Since the Mexican case law in this area is still developing, it is very important that Mexico adopt deferred prosecution agreements, non-prosecution agreements, or a variation thereof that require compliance programs to enhance the public perception of the Mexican government and the judiciary. Mexico is just one of many countries amending its laws, suggesting a shift toward an implied understanding of the importance of a compliance-oriented approach. Foreign jurisdictions and the U.S. DOJ continue to enact programs to help regulate laws and deter criminal activity in many industries. The acceptance of the corporate criminal liability doctrine in several jurisdictions promotes the public interest and the integrity of the legal system, deters future illegal activity, and helps ensure corporate compliance with the law.