应对能力的系统文献回顾与元分析:对实施的影响与启示

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied School Psychology Pub Date : 2023-04-10 DOI:10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946
Sara C. McDaniel, Laci Watkins, Jason C. Chow, Megan Fedewa, Sharon Nemer
{"title":"应对能力的系统文献回顾与元分析:对实施的影响与启示","authors":"Sara C. McDaniel, Laci Watkins, Jason C. Chow, Megan Fedewa, Sharon Nemer","doi":"10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Coping Power (CP) is an evidence-based intervention that reduces externalizing behaviors in students who are identified as aggressive or disruptive. CP is based on a cognitive-behavioral model and involves child-focused group sessions and parent-focused sessions. A large body of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of CP, but to date there has not been a systematic review or meta-analysis of published CP studies. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review examining the characteristics, methodological rigor, and social validity of CP studies and to conduct a selective meta-analysis to examine the effects of CP across studies and to identify potential moderators of intervention effectiveness. The 21 studies included in the review indicate that the CP intervention is supported by rigorous research, effectively reduces maladaptive behavior, and has demonstrated multiple indicators of social validity. A selective meta-analysis of 12 studies indicates that CP has resulted in small to moderate reductions in externalizing behavior, although these findings were not statistically significant. Intervention dosage, agent, and parent/caregiverparticipation did not moderate effects. Limitations, implications for future research, and recommendations for clinical practice are provided.","PeriodicalId":46345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Coping Power: Effects and Implications for Implementation\",\"authors\":\"Sara C. McDaniel, Laci Watkins, Jason C. Chow, Megan Fedewa, Sharon Nemer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Coping Power (CP) is an evidence-based intervention that reduces externalizing behaviors in students who are identified as aggressive or disruptive. CP is based on a cognitive-behavioral model and involves child-focused group sessions and parent-focused sessions. A large body of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of CP, but to date there has not been a systematic review or meta-analysis of published CP studies. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review examining the characteristics, methodological rigor, and social validity of CP studies and to conduct a selective meta-analysis to examine the effects of CP across studies and to identify potential moderators of intervention effectiveness. The 21 studies included in the review indicate that the CP intervention is supported by rigorous research, effectively reduces maladaptive behavior, and has demonstrated multiple indicators of social validity. A selective meta-analysis of 12 studies indicates that CP has resulted in small to moderate reductions in externalizing behavior, although these findings were not statistically significant. Intervention dosage, agent, and parent/caregiverparticipation did not moderate effects. Limitations, implications for future research, and recommendations for clinical practice are provided.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2023.2196946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要应对能力(CP)是一种基于证据的干预措施,可以减少被认定为攻击性或破坏性的学生的外化行为。CP基于认知-行为模型,包括以儿童为中心的小组会议和以父母为中心的会议。大量研究已经证明了CP的有效性,但迄今为止,还没有对已发表的CP研究进行系统综述或荟萃分析。因此,这项工作的目的是对CP研究的特征、方法学严谨性和社会有效性进行系统综述,并进行选择性荟萃分析,以检查CP在各研究中的影响,并确定干预有效性的潜在调节因素。综述中的21项研究表明,CP干预得到了严格研究的支持,有效地减少了适应不良行为,并证明了社会有效性的多项指标。一项对12项研究的选择性荟萃分析表明,CP导致了外化行为的小到中度减少,尽管这些发现在统计学上并不显著。干预剂量、药物和父母/照顾者的参与并没有中度影响。提供了局限性、对未来研究的影响以及对临床实践的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Coping Power: Effects and Implications for Implementation
Abstract Coping Power (CP) is an evidence-based intervention that reduces externalizing behaviors in students who are identified as aggressive or disruptive. CP is based on a cognitive-behavioral model and involves child-focused group sessions and parent-focused sessions. A large body of research has demonstrated the effectiveness of CP, but to date there has not been a systematic review or meta-analysis of published CP studies. Therefore, the purpose of this work was to conduct a systematic review examining the characteristics, methodological rigor, and social validity of CP studies and to conduct a selective meta-analysis to examine the effects of CP across studies and to identify potential moderators of intervention effectiveness. The 21 studies included in the review indicate that the CP intervention is supported by rigorous research, effectively reduces maladaptive behavior, and has demonstrated multiple indicators of social validity. A selective meta-analysis of 12 studies indicates that CP has resulted in small to moderate reductions in externalizing behavior, although these findings were not statistically significant. Intervention dosage, agent, and parent/caregiverparticipation did not moderate effects. Limitations, implications for future research, and recommendations for clinical practice are provided.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied School Psychology
Journal of Applied School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: With a new publisher (Taylor & Francis) and a new editor (David L. Wodrich), the Journal of Applied School Psychology will continue to publish articles and periodic thematic issues in 2009. Each submission should rest on either solid theoretical or empirical support and provide information that can be used in applied school settings, related educational systems, or community locations in which practitioners work. Manuscripts appropriate for publication in the journal will reflect psychological applications that pertain to individual students, groups of students, teachers, parents, and administrators. The journal also seeks, over time, novel and creative ways in which to disseminate information about practically sound and empirically supported school psychology practice.
期刊最新文献
Multidimensional Risk and Resilience Factors in Urban Youth with Unhealthy Weight Perceptions of Autistic and Nonautistic High School Students Regarding Factors That Impact Their Motivation to Be Academically Successful Universal Behavioral Screening: Inclusion of Student’s Trauma Symptoms and Hurricane Exposure The Effects of Fidget Spinners on Oral Reading Fluency Peer Victimization among Black Preschoolers: Roles of Emotion Knowledge, Teacher-Child Relationships, and Gender
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1