评估生物安全措施在玻璃容器管理中的效果

IF 0.7 Q4 ZOOLOGY Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.19227/JZAR.V9I3.470
M. Jensen, U. Jensen, M. Bertelsen
{"title":"评估生物安全措施在玻璃容器管理中的效果","authors":"M. Jensen, U. Jensen, M. Bertelsen","doi":"10.19227/JZAR.V9I3.470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As wild populations of amphibians and reptiles are threatened by habitat loss and emerging diseases, the importance of captive populations serving as survival assurance colonies and stock for reintroduction programmes increases. As does the need for adequate biosecurity procedures to reduce risks of pathogen spread within captive populations. This study documents the pathways of pathogens induced during some of the daily husbandry procedures performed by zookeepers, and how they can be mitigated. The study compares the effectiveness of two different biosecurity measures, individually and combined, at reducing pathogen transfer. Ten zookeepers performed daily husbandry routines on 10 simulated terrariums using no biosecurity measures, or using designated tools, disposable gloves, or a combination of the two. The effectiveness of these measures to avoid pathogen spread was investigated through the use of a UV tracer, allowing detection of contamination of subsequent enclosures. The study documented a significant difference between the degree of contamination in the four trials (P<0.0001), with the combination of gloves and dedicated tools providing the lowest degree of contamination (P<0.0001 compared to the control scenario). Although there was a tendency for gloves to reduce contamination, neither gloves nor dedicated tools alone significantly decreased contamination. The study clearly demonstrates the dramatic effect of simple biosecurity measures for reducing pathogen spread among animal enclosures and introduces a simple yet effective tool to the field of zoo management.","PeriodicalId":56160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"157-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effects of biosecurity measures in terrarium management\",\"authors\":\"M. Jensen, U. Jensen, M. Bertelsen\",\"doi\":\"10.19227/JZAR.V9I3.470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As wild populations of amphibians and reptiles are threatened by habitat loss and emerging diseases, the importance of captive populations serving as survival assurance colonies and stock for reintroduction programmes increases. As does the need for adequate biosecurity procedures to reduce risks of pathogen spread within captive populations. This study documents the pathways of pathogens induced during some of the daily husbandry procedures performed by zookeepers, and how they can be mitigated. The study compares the effectiveness of two different biosecurity measures, individually and combined, at reducing pathogen transfer. Ten zookeepers performed daily husbandry routines on 10 simulated terrariums using no biosecurity measures, or using designated tools, disposable gloves, or a combination of the two. The effectiveness of these measures to avoid pathogen spread was investigated through the use of a UV tracer, allowing detection of contamination of subsequent enclosures. The study documented a significant difference between the degree of contamination in the four trials (P<0.0001), with the combination of gloves and dedicated tools providing the lowest degree of contamination (P<0.0001 compared to the control scenario). Although there was a tendency for gloves to reduce contamination, neither gloves nor dedicated tools alone significantly decreased contamination. The study clearly demonstrates the dramatic effect of simple biosecurity measures for reducing pathogen spread among animal enclosures and introduces a simple yet effective tool to the field of zoo management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"157-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19227/JZAR.V9I3.470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoo and Aquarium Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19227/JZAR.V9I3.470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着两栖动物和爬行动物的野生种群受到栖息地丧失和新出现疾病的威胁,圈养种群作为生存保障群体和重新引入计划的种群的重要性增加。同样需要适当的生物安全程序来降低病原体在圈养种群中传播的风险。这项研究记录了动物园管理员在日常饲养过程中诱发病原体的途径,以及如何减轻这些途径。该研究比较了两种不同的生物安全措施(单独和联合)在减少病原体转移方面的有效性。10名动物园管理员在10个模拟水族馆上进行日常饲养,不使用生物安全措施,或使用指定工具、一次性手套或两者结合。通过使用紫外线示踪剂对这些措施避免病原体传播的有效性进行了研究,从而可以检测后续围栏的污染。该研究记录了四项试验中污染程度之间的显著差异(P<0.0001),手套和专用工具的组合提供了最低的污染程度(与对照方案相比,P<0.0001)。尽管手套有减少污染的趋势,但无论是手套还是专用工具都不能显著减少污染。这项研究清楚地证明了简单的生物安全措施在减少病原体在动物围栏中传播方面的巨大效果,并为动物园管理领域引入了一种简单而有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the effects of biosecurity measures in terrarium management
As wild populations of amphibians and reptiles are threatened by habitat loss and emerging diseases, the importance of captive populations serving as survival assurance colonies and stock for reintroduction programmes increases. As does the need for adequate biosecurity procedures to reduce risks of pathogen spread within captive populations. This study documents the pathways of pathogens induced during some of the daily husbandry procedures performed by zookeepers, and how they can be mitigated. The study compares the effectiveness of two different biosecurity measures, individually and combined, at reducing pathogen transfer. Ten zookeepers performed daily husbandry routines on 10 simulated terrariums using no biosecurity measures, or using designated tools, disposable gloves, or a combination of the two. The effectiveness of these measures to avoid pathogen spread was investigated through the use of a UV tracer, allowing detection of contamination of subsequent enclosures. The study documented a significant difference between the degree of contamination in the four trials (P<0.0001), with the combination of gloves and dedicated tools providing the lowest degree of contamination (P<0.0001 compared to the control scenario). Although there was a tendency for gloves to reduce contamination, neither gloves nor dedicated tools alone significantly decreased contamination. The study clearly demonstrates the dramatic effect of simple biosecurity measures for reducing pathogen spread among animal enclosures and introduces a simple yet effective tool to the field of zoo management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interest in coloured objects and behavioural budgets of individual captive freshwater turtles Assessing the effects of biosecurity measures in terrarium management Assessing choice ability and preferences of five Leopard Tortoises (Stigmochelys pardalis) for three stimuli through a novel two-phase preference test Artemia as a sustainably cultured live feed for ornamental fish in zoological institutions with immunostimulant properties when bioencapsulated with spirulina (Arthrospria platensis). Enclosure Use as a Measure of Behavioral Welfare in Zoo-Housed African Wild Dogs (Lycaon pictus)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1