FASB的简化计划是否增加了分析师隐含ETR预测的误差?早期采用ASU的证据2016-09

IF 1.3 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of the American Taxation Association Pub Date : 2018-09-01 DOI:10.2308/ATAX-52247
James D. Brushwood, Derek Johnston, L. Kutcher, James Stekelberg
{"title":"FASB的简化计划是否增加了分析师隐含ETR预测的误差?早期采用ASU的证据2016-09","authors":"James D. Brushwood, Derek Johnston, L. Kutcher, James Stekelberg","doi":"10.2308/ATAX-52247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Part of the FASB's broader simplification initiative, ASU 2016-09 was issued on March 30, 2016 and became effective for all firms for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for the tax effects of stock-based compensation by requiring firms to record all related tax windfalls and shortfalls as components of current income tax expense rather than as direct-to-equity adjustments, as was required under prior guidance. Many observers note this change may introduce significant volatility and uncertainty into firms' ETRs. Consistent with this concern, we document that errors in analysts' “clean” ETR forecasts significantly increased among firms reporting a material ETR effect due to early-adopting ASU 2016-09, relative to other firms. Our results suggest that simplification came at the cost of a decrease in the predictability of tax-related financial information; as such, this study provides timely evidence on an important economic consequence of ASU 2016-09.","PeriodicalId":45477,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did the FASB's Simplification Initiative Increase Errors in Analysts' Implied ETR Forecasts? Evidence from Early Adoption of ASU 2016-09\",\"authors\":\"James D. Brushwood, Derek Johnston, L. Kutcher, James Stekelberg\",\"doi\":\"10.2308/ATAX-52247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Part of the FASB's broader simplification initiative, ASU 2016-09 was issued on March 30, 2016 and became effective for all firms for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for the tax effects of stock-based compensation by requiring firms to record all related tax windfalls and shortfalls as components of current income tax expense rather than as direct-to-equity adjustments, as was required under prior guidance. Many observers note this change may introduce significant volatility and uncertainty into firms' ETRs. Consistent with this concern, we document that errors in analysts' “clean” ETR forecasts significantly increased among firms reporting a material ETR effect due to early-adopting ASU 2016-09, relative to other firms. Our results suggest that simplification came at the cost of a decrease in the predictability of tax-related financial information; as such, this study provides timely evidence on an important economic consequence of ASU 2016-09.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Taxation Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Taxation Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2308/ATAX-52247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Taxation Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/ATAX-52247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

作为FASB更广泛简化举措的一部分,ASU 2016-09于2016年3月30日发布,并在2016年12月15日之后的财政年度对所有公司生效。ASU 2016-09简化了股票薪酬税收影响的核算,要求公司将所有相关的税收盈余和短缺记录为当前所得税费用的组成部分,而不是按照之前的指导要求直接记录为股权调整。许多观察人士指出,这一变化可能会给企业的ETR带来巨大的波动性和不确定性。与这一担忧一致,我们记录到,与其他公司相比,由于提前采用ASU 2016-09,报告重大ETR影响的公司中,分析师“干净”ETR预测的错误显著增加。我们的研究结果表明,简化是以税收相关财务信息的可预测性下降为代价的;因此,本研究为ASU 2016-09的一个重要经济后果提供了及时的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Did the FASB's Simplification Initiative Increase Errors in Analysts' Implied ETR Forecasts? Evidence from Early Adoption of ASU 2016-09
Part of the FASB's broader simplification initiative, ASU 2016-09 was issued on March 30, 2016 and became effective for all firms for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU 2016-09 simplifies the accounting for the tax effects of stock-based compensation by requiring firms to record all related tax windfalls and shortfalls as components of current income tax expense rather than as direct-to-equity adjustments, as was required under prior guidance. Many observers note this change may introduce significant volatility and uncertainty into firms' ETRs. Consistent with this concern, we document that errors in analysts' “clean” ETR forecasts significantly increased among firms reporting a material ETR effect due to early-adopting ASU 2016-09, relative to other firms. Our results suggest that simplification came at the cost of a decrease in the predictability of tax-related financial information; as such, this study provides timely evidence on an important economic consequence of ASU 2016-09.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Managers’ Stock Price Incentives and Earnings Management Using Tax Expense The Efficiency of Interactive Voice Response Systems and Tax Compliance: A Field Experiment by the California Franchise Tax Board Editorial Policy DISCUSSION OF Companies’ Initial Estimates of the One-Time Transition Tax Imposed by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Summaries of Papers In This Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1