内窥镜下颈椎后椎间孔切开术治疗骨狭窄—文献综述

S. Hemmer, J. Oertel
{"title":"内窥镜下颈椎后椎间孔切开术治疗骨狭窄—文献综述","authors":"S. Hemmer, J. Oertel","doi":"10.4172/2376-0281.1000285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a feasible treatment option for cervical radiculopathy. In this article, we want to give a short review on the advantages, indications and limitations of this treatment procedure. Methods: A Medline search for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy was done and 13 articles were compared regarding the surgical technique, patient outcome, complications, intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, hospital stay and postoperative need for pain medication. Results: Compared to patients treated by an open approach, patients treated by endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy show equal clinical results, but lower complication rates and less intraoperative blood loss, reduced surgical time, hospital stay and postoperative need for pain medication. Conclusion: This review shows that posterior endoscopic decompression is a successful option in the treatment of bony cervical foraminal stenosis.","PeriodicalId":91292,"journal":{"name":"International journal of neurorehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2376-0281.1000285","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in Bony Stenosis – A Review of the Literature\",\"authors\":\"S. Hemmer, J. Oertel\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2376-0281.1000285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a feasible treatment option for cervical radiculopathy. In this article, we want to give a short review on the advantages, indications and limitations of this treatment procedure. Methods: A Medline search for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy was done and 13 articles were compared regarding the surgical technique, patient outcome, complications, intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, hospital stay and postoperative need for pain medication. Results: Compared to patients treated by an open approach, patients treated by endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy show equal clinical results, but lower complication rates and less intraoperative blood loss, reduced surgical time, hospital stay and postoperative need for pain medication. Conclusion: This review shows that posterior endoscopic decompression is a successful option in the treatment of bony cervical foraminal stenosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of neurorehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2376-0281.1000285\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of neurorehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0281.1000285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2376-0281.1000285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:后路颈椎椎间孔切开术是治疗颈椎神经根病的可行方法。在这篇文章中,我们想对这种治疗方法的优点、适应症和局限性做一个简短的回顾。方法:对内镜下颈椎后椎间孔切开术进行Medline检索,比较13篇文献的手术技术、患者预后、并发症、术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间和术后止痛药需求。结果:与开放入路相比,内镜下颈椎后椎间孔切开术患者的临床效果相同,但并发症发生率更低,术中出血量更少,手术时间、住院时间和术后止痛药用量更少。结论:本综述显示后路内窥镜减压是治疗椎骨间孔狭窄的成功选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in Bony Stenosis – A Review of the Literature
Background: Posterior cervical foraminotomy is a feasible treatment option for cervical radiculopathy. In this article, we want to give a short review on the advantages, indications and limitations of this treatment procedure. Methods: A Medline search for endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy was done and 13 articles were compared regarding the surgical technique, patient outcome, complications, intraoperative blood loss, surgical time, hospital stay and postoperative need for pain medication. Results: Compared to patients treated by an open approach, patients treated by endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy show equal clinical results, but lower complication rates and less intraoperative blood loss, reduced surgical time, hospital stay and postoperative need for pain medication. Conclusion: This review shows that posterior endoscopic decompression is a successful option in the treatment of bony cervical foraminal stenosis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidural Stimulation Benefits and Mechanism of Treatment Cerebrovascular Pathophysiology and its Diagnosis Nerve Injury/Damage An Overview of Neurotrauma Causal Relationship Between Behavioral andPsychological Symptoms of Dementia and AutonomicNervous Activity: A Covariance Structure Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1