估算的总冠层SIF排放对遥感LAI和BRDF产品的敏感性

遥感学报 Pub Date : 2021-09-17 DOI:10.34133/2021/9795837
Zhaoying Zhang, Yongguang Zhang, Jing M. Chen, W. Ju, M. Migliavacca, T. El-Madany
{"title":"估算的总冠层SIF排放对遥感LAI和BRDF产品的敏感性","authors":"Zhaoying Zhang, Yongguang Zhang, Jing M. Chen, W. Ju, M. Migliavacca, T. El-Madany","doi":"10.34133/2021/9795837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provides new possibilities to estimate terrestrial gross primary production (GPP). To mitigate the angular and canopy structural effects on original SIF observed by sensors (SIFobs), it is recommended to derive total canopy SIF emission (SIFtotal) of leaves within a canopy using canopy interception (i0) and reflectance of vegetation (RV). However, the effects of the uncertainties in i0 and RV on the estimation of SIFtotal have not been well understood. Here, we evaluated such effects on the estimation of GPP using the Soil-Canopy-Observation of Photosynthesis and the Energy balance (SCOPE) model. The SCOPE simulations showed that the R2 between GPP and SIFtotal was clearly higher than that between GPP and SIFobs and the differences in R2 (ΔR2) tend to decrease with the increasing levels of uncertainties in i0 and RV. The resultant ΔR2 decreased to zero when the uncertainty level in i0 and RV was ~30% for red band SIF (RSIF, 683 nm) and ~20% for far-red band SIF (FRSIF, 740 nm). In addition, as compared to the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) SIFobs at both red and far-red bands, SIFtotal derived using any combination of i0 (from MCD15, VNP15, and CGLS LAI products) and RV (from MCD34, MCD19, and VNP43 BRDF products) showed comparable improvements in estimating GPP. With this study, we suggest a way to advance our understanding in the estimation of a more physiological relevant SIF datasets (SIFtotal) using current satellite products.","PeriodicalId":38304,"journal":{"name":"遥感学报","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity of Estimated Total Canopy SIF Emission to Remotely Sensed LAI and BRDF Products\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoying Zhang, Yongguang Zhang, Jing M. Chen, W. Ju, M. Migliavacca, T. El-Madany\",\"doi\":\"10.34133/2021/9795837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provides new possibilities to estimate terrestrial gross primary production (GPP). To mitigate the angular and canopy structural effects on original SIF observed by sensors (SIFobs), it is recommended to derive total canopy SIF emission (SIFtotal) of leaves within a canopy using canopy interception (i0) and reflectance of vegetation (RV). However, the effects of the uncertainties in i0 and RV on the estimation of SIFtotal have not been well understood. Here, we evaluated such effects on the estimation of GPP using the Soil-Canopy-Observation of Photosynthesis and the Energy balance (SCOPE) model. The SCOPE simulations showed that the R2 between GPP and SIFtotal was clearly higher than that between GPP and SIFobs and the differences in R2 (ΔR2) tend to decrease with the increasing levels of uncertainties in i0 and RV. The resultant ΔR2 decreased to zero when the uncertainty level in i0 and RV was ~30% for red band SIF (RSIF, 683 nm) and ~20% for far-red band SIF (FRSIF, 740 nm). In addition, as compared to the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) SIFobs at both red and far-red bands, SIFtotal derived using any combination of i0 (from MCD15, VNP15, and CGLS LAI products) and RV (from MCD34, MCD19, and VNP43 BRDF products) showed comparable improvements in estimating GPP. With this study, we suggest a way to advance our understanding in the estimation of a more physiological relevant SIF datasets (SIFtotal) using current satellite products.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"遥感学报\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"遥感学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9795837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"遥感学报","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9795837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

太阳诱导叶绿素荧光(SIF)遥感为估算陆地初级生产总量(GPP)提供了新的可能性。为了减轻角度和冠层结构对传感器观测到的原始SIF的影响,建议使用冠层拦截(i0)和植被反射率(RV)来计算冠层内叶片的总SIF发射(SIFtotal)。然而,i0和RV的不确定性对SIFtotal估计的影响尚未得到很好的理解。本文利用土壤-冠层-光合作用观测和能量平衡(SCOPE)模型评估了这种影响对GPP估算的影响。SCOPE模拟结果表明,GPP与SIFtotal之间的R2明显高于GPP与SIFobs之间的R2,且R2 (ΔR2)的差异随着i0和RV不确定性水平的增加而减小。当红外波段SIF (RSIF, 683nm)和远红外波段SIF (FRSIF, 740 nm)的不确定度分别为~30%和~20%时,所得ΔR2降至零。此外,与对流层监测仪器(TROPOMI)在红色和远红色波段的sifbs相比,使用i0(来自MCD15、VNP15和CGLS LAI产品)和RV(来自MCD34、MCD19和VNP43 BRDF产品)的任何组合获得的SIFtotal在估计GPP方面都显示出相当的改善。通过这项研究,我们提出了一种方法来提高我们对使用当前卫星产品估计更生理相关的SIF数据集(SIFtotal)的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensitivity of Estimated Total Canopy SIF Emission to Remotely Sensed LAI and BRDF Products
Remote sensing of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) provides new possibilities to estimate terrestrial gross primary production (GPP). To mitigate the angular and canopy structural effects on original SIF observed by sensors (SIFobs), it is recommended to derive total canopy SIF emission (SIFtotal) of leaves within a canopy using canopy interception (i0) and reflectance of vegetation (RV). However, the effects of the uncertainties in i0 and RV on the estimation of SIFtotal have not been well understood. Here, we evaluated such effects on the estimation of GPP using the Soil-Canopy-Observation of Photosynthesis and the Energy balance (SCOPE) model. The SCOPE simulations showed that the R2 between GPP and SIFtotal was clearly higher than that between GPP and SIFobs and the differences in R2 (ΔR2) tend to decrease with the increasing levels of uncertainties in i0 and RV. The resultant ΔR2 decreased to zero when the uncertainty level in i0 and RV was ~30% for red band SIF (RSIF, 683 nm) and ~20% for far-red band SIF (FRSIF, 740 nm). In addition, as compared to the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) SIFobs at both red and far-red bands, SIFtotal derived using any combination of i0 (from MCD15, VNP15, and CGLS LAI products) and RV (from MCD34, MCD19, and VNP43 BRDF products) showed comparable improvements in estimating GPP. With this study, we suggest a way to advance our understanding in the estimation of a more physiological relevant SIF datasets (SIFtotal) using current satellite products.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
遥感学报
遥感学报 Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3200
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Combining solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and optical vegetation indices to better understand plant phenological responses to global change Simulating potential tree height for beech-maple-birch forests in northeastern United States on Google Earth Engine Globe230k: A benchmark dense-pixel annotation dataset for global land cover mapping Urban renewal mapping: A case study in Beijing from 2000 to 2020 Improved fine-scale tropical forest cover mapping for Southeast Asia using Planet-NICFI and Sentinel-1 imagery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1