恢复和合作繁荣社会生态景观

Q2 Social Sciences Transnational Legal Theory Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/20414005.2020.1765290
Afshin Akhtar-Khavari
{"title":"恢复和合作繁荣社会生态景观","authors":"Afshin Akhtar-Khavari","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2020.1765290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Environmental law is ontologically committed to competition. This is evidenced by its use of framing concepts like sustainability which assume that landscapes have always had the carrying capacity to regenerate on their own. The Anthropocene, if anything, points to the deep entanglements that exist in nature and for human beings. Whilst competition explains evolutionary trends, there is much evidence pointing to the idea that cooperation and symbiosis amongst living things is a much better indicator of long-term change in the natural environment. Deep entanglements are better supported through cooperation than competition. Drawing on ideas from scientific research on symbiosis, this paper argues that environmental law is missing deep ontological commitments to cooperation between human beings and the natural world. Restoration, approached not just as a technical rules-based response to damage and degradation, but as an activity requiring cooperation with the natural world would potentially better support flourishing socio-ecological landscapes.","PeriodicalId":37728,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Legal Theory","volume":"11 1","pages":"62 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20414005.2020.1765290","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Restoration and cooperation for flourishing socio-ecological landscapes\",\"authors\":\"Afshin Akhtar-Khavari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20414005.2020.1765290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Environmental law is ontologically committed to competition. This is evidenced by its use of framing concepts like sustainability which assume that landscapes have always had the carrying capacity to regenerate on their own. The Anthropocene, if anything, points to the deep entanglements that exist in nature and for human beings. Whilst competition explains evolutionary trends, there is much evidence pointing to the idea that cooperation and symbiosis amongst living things is a much better indicator of long-term change in the natural environment. Deep entanglements are better supported through cooperation than competition. Drawing on ideas from scientific research on symbiosis, this paper argues that environmental law is missing deep ontological commitments to cooperation between human beings and the natural world. Restoration, approached not just as a technical rules-based response to damage and degradation, but as an activity requiring cooperation with the natural world would potentially better support flourishing socio-ecological landscapes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"62 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20414005.2020.1765290\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Legal Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1765290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Legal Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2020.1765290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

环境法在本体论上致力于竞争。这一点可以从它使用的可持续性等框架概念中得到证明,这些概念假设景观始终具有自我再生的承载能力。如果有什么不同的话,人类世指出了自然界和人类之间存在的深刻纠葛。虽然竞争可以解释进化趋势,但有很多证据表明,生物之间的合作和共生是自然环境长期变化的更好指标。通过合作而不是竞争来更好地支持深层次的纠缠。本文借鉴共生科学研究的思想,认为环境法缺少对人类与自然世界合作的深层本体论承诺。恢复不仅是一种基于技术规则的应对破坏和退化的措施,而且是一种需要与自然世界合作的活动,这可能会更好地支持繁荣的社会生态景观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Restoration and cooperation for flourishing socio-ecological landscapes
ABSTRACT Environmental law is ontologically committed to competition. This is evidenced by its use of framing concepts like sustainability which assume that landscapes have always had the carrying capacity to regenerate on their own. The Anthropocene, if anything, points to the deep entanglements that exist in nature and for human beings. Whilst competition explains evolutionary trends, there is much evidence pointing to the idea that cooperation and symbiosis amongst living things is a much better indicator of long-term change in the natural environment. Deep entanglements are better supported through cooperation than competition. Drawing on ideas from scientific research on symbiosis, this paper argues that environmental law is missing deep ontological commitments to cooperation between human beings and the natural world. Restoration, approached not just as a technical rules-based response to damage and degradation, but as an activity requiring cooperation with the natural world would potentially better support flourishing socio-ecological landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transnational Legal Theory
Transnational Legal Theory Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The objective of Transnational Legal Theory is to publish high-quality theoretical scholarship that addresses transnational dimensions of law and legal dimensions of transnational fields and activity. Central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is publication of work that explores whether and how transnational contexts, forces and ideations affect debates within existing traditions or schools of legal thought. Similarly, the journal aspires to encourage scholars debating general theories about law to consider the relevance of transnational contexts and dimensions for their work. With respect to particular jurisprudence, the journal welcomes not only submissions that involve theoretical explorations of fields commonly constructed as transnational in nature (such as commercial law, maritime law, or cyberlaw) but also explorations of transnational aspects of fields less commonly understood in this way (for example, criminal law, family law, company law, tort law, evidence law, and so on). Submissions of work exploring process-oriented approaches to law as transnational (from transjurisdictional litigation to delocalized arbitration to multi-level governance) are also encouraged. Equally central to Transnational Legal Theory''s mandate is theoretical work that explores fresh (or revived) understandings of international law and comparative law ''beyond the state'' (and the interstate). The journal has a special interest in submissions that explore the interfaces, intersections, and mutual embeddedness of public international law, private international law, and comparative law, notably in terms of whether such inter-relationships are reshaping these sub-disciplines in directions that are, in important respects, transnational in nature.
期刊最新文献
Toleration in the European Union: a forgotten virtue The construction of social Europe through transnational equality All in good time: temporal forms of public law decisions The Trojan Horse of sovereign debt Bluntschli, C’est Moi ? International legal history and hagiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1