为新语言能力评估的质量和使用辩护:重新设计的TOEIC Bridge®测试的有效性论证

Q3 Social Sciences ETS Research Report Series Pub Date : 2021-09-24 DOI:10.1002/ets2.12335
Jonathan Schmidgall, Jaime Cid, Elizabeth Carter Grissom, Lucy Li
{"title":"为新语言能力评估的质量和使用辩护:重新设计的TOEIC Bridge®测试的有效性论证","authors":"Jonathan Schmidgall,&nbsp;Jaime Cid,&nbsp;Elizabeth Carter Grissom,&nbsp;Lucy Li","doi":"10.1002/ets2.12335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The redesigned <i>TOEIC Bridge</i>® tests were designed to evaluate test takers' English listening, reading, speaking, and writing skills in the context of everyday adult life. In this paper, we summarize the initial validity argument that supports the use of test scores for the purpose of selection, placement, and evaluation of a test taker's English skills. The validity argument consists of four major claims that provide a coherent narrative about the measurement quality and intended uses of test scores. Each major claim in the validity argument is supported by more specific claims and a summary of supporting evidence. By considering the claims and supporting evidence presented in the validity argument, readers should be able to better evaluate whether the TOEIC Bridge tests are appropriate for their situation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11972,"journal":{"name":"ETS Research Report Series","volume":"2021 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ets2.12335","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making the Case for the Quality and Use of a New Language Proficiency Assessment: Validity Argument for the Redesigned TOEIC Bridge® Tests\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Schmidgall,&nbsp;Jaime Cid,&nbsp;Elizabeth Carter Grissom,&nbsp;Lucy Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ets2.12335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The redesigned <i>TOEIC Bridge</i>® tests were designed to evaluate test takers' English listening, reading, speaking, and writing skills in the context of everyday adult life. In this paper, we summarize the initial validity argument that supports the use of test scores for the purpose of selection, placement, and evaluation of a test taker's English skills. The validity argument consists of four major claims that provide a coherent narrative about the measurement quality and intended uses of test scores. Each major claim in the validity argument is supported by more specific claims and a summary of supporting evidence. By considering the claims and supporting evidence presented in the validity argument, readers should be able to better evaluate whether the TOEIC Bridge tests are appropriate for their situation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ETS Research Report Series\",\"volume\":\"2021 1\",\"pages\":\"1-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ets2.12335\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ETS Research Report Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETS Research Report Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重新设计的TOEIC Bridge®考试旨在评估考生在日常成人生活中的英语听力、阅读、口语和写作技能。在本文中,我们总结了最初的有效性论点,该论点支持使用考试成绩作为选择、安置和评估考生英语技能的目的。有效性论证由四个主要主张组成,这些主张提供了关于测试分数的测量质量和预期用途的连贯叙述。有效性论证中的每一个主要主张都有更具体的主张和支持性证据的摘要来支持。通过考虑有效性论证中提出的主张和支持证据,读者应该能够更好地评估托业桥梁考试是否适合他们的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making the Case for the Quality and Use of a New Language Proficiency Assessment: Validity Argument for the Redesigned TOEIC Bridge® Tests

The redesigned TOEIC Bridge® tests were designed to evaluate test takers' English listening, reading, speaking, and writing skills in the context of everyday adult life. In this paper, we summarize the initial validity argument that supports the use of test scores for the purpose of selection, placement, and evaluation of a test taker's English skills. The validity argument consists of four major claims that provide a coherent narrative about the measurement quality and intended uses of test scores. Each major claim in the validity argument is supported by more specific claims and a summary of supporting evidence. By considering the claims and supporting evidence presented in the validity argument, readers should be able to better evaluate whether the TOEIC Bridge tests are appropriate for their situation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ETS Research Report Series
ETS Research Report Series Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Building a Validity Argument for the TOEFL Junior® Tests Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD‐Next Exam Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Practical Considerations in Item Calibration With Small Samples Under Multistage Test Design: A Case Study Modeling Writing Traits in a Formative Essay Corpus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1