髂后螺钉棒治疗单侧不稳定DenisⅠ、Ⅱ型骶骨骨折

Haotian Qi, Jian Jia, W. Tian, Zhao-Jie Liu, Hong-chuan Wang
{"title":"髂后螺钉棒治疗单侧不稳定DenisⅠ、Ⅱ型骶骨骨折","authors":"Haotian Qi, Jian Jia, W. Tian, Zhao-Jie Liu, Hong-chuan Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.05.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the efficacy of posterior iliac screw rod for unilateral unstable Denis I and II sacral fractures. \n \n \nMethods \nData of 50 patients with unilateral unstable Denis I, II sacral fractures treated from March 2016 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to fixation methods, the patients were divided into posterior iliac screw rod group (Iliac screw rod group) and robot-assisted iliosacral screw group (Iliosacral screw group). There were 20 patients in the Iliac screw rod group, 13 males and 7 females, with an average age of 41.10±14.07 years (range, 22-76 years), and there were 5 cases of Denis type I and 15 cases of type II sacral fractures. All of them had anterior pelvic ring injuries, and according to pelvic Tile classification, there were 2 B1 type, 12 B2 type, 6 C1 type, and 3 cases of Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injuries. There were 30 patients in the Iliosacral screw group, 18 males and 12 females, with an average age of 44.70±13.35 years (range,16-78 years), and there were 6 cases of type I and 24 cases of type II sacral fractures. There were 2 cases of type B1, 20 cases of B2, 8 cases of C1 pelvic fractures, 4 cases combined with sacral nerve injuries including 3 cases of Gibbons grade II and 1 case of grade III. The patients’ age, operation time, amount of bleeding, times of fluoroscopy, postoperative Majeed score were compared by the independent t test. The quality of fracture reduction was compared by Chi-square test, and the postoperative Gibbons grade was compared by the rank sum test. \n \n \nResults \nAll patients were followed up for 22.8 months (range, 12-40 months). In the Iliac screw rod group, the operation time was 41.40±7.30 min, intraoperative blood loss 105.00±61.94 ml, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy 19.10±7.33, and according to Mears and Velyvis valuation criterion, there were 9 cases of anatomical reduction, 10 cases of satisfactory reduction, and 1 case of unsatisfactory reduction, with the Majeed score of 84.25±8.29. There were 3 cases with Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injury, and 2 of them recovered to grade I. In the Iliosacral screw group, the operation time was 18.27±5.89 min, intraoperative blood loss 33.00±17.54 ml, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy 14.93±4.49, and according to Mears and Velyvis valuation criterion, there were 15 cases of anatomical reduction, 13 cases of satisfactory reduction and 2 cases of unsatisfactory reduction, with the Majeed score of 86.43±7.43. There were 3 cases with Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injury, and 2 of them recovered to grade I, and 1 case with grade III recovered to grade II postoperation. Compared to Iliosacral screw group, the Iliac screw rod group has longer operation time (t=-12.36, P<0.001), more blood loss (t=-6.04, P<0.001) and more intraoperative times of fluoroscopy (t=-2.50, P=0.016). There were no statistical differences for quality of fracture reduction (χ2=0.23, P=0.89), Majeed score (t=0.97, P=0.34), and the Gibbons grade (Z=-0.224, P=0.82) between the two groups. In the Iliac screw rod group, 1 patient had a unilateral superficial wound infection and 1 patient complained of discomfort because of the nail. In the Iliosacral screw group 1 patient had iatrogenic S1 neurological injury. \n \n \nConclusion \nFor the unstable sacral fractures, who are not suitable for iliosacral screw fixation, posterior iliac screw rod fixation is an effective alternative with similar clinical effect as robot assisted iliosacral screw fixation. \n \n \nKey words: \nSacrum; Fractures, bone; Fracture fixation, internal; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive","PeriodicalId":36405,"journal":{"name":"中华骨科杂志","volume":"40 1","pages":"317-324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posterior iliac screw rod for the treatment of unilateral unstable Denis I and II sacral fractures\",\"authors\":\"Haotian Qi, Jian Jia, W. Tian, Zhao-Jie Liu, Hong-chuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.05.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the efficacy of posterior iliac screw rod for unilateral unstable Denis I and II sacral fractures. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nData of 50 patients with unilateral unstable Denis I, II sacral fractures treated from March 2016 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to fixation methods, the patients were divided into posterior iliac screw rod group (Iliac screw rod group) and robot-assisted iliosacral screw group (Iliosacral screw group). There were 20 patients in the Iliac screw rod group, 13 males and 7 females, with an average age of 41.10±14.07 years (range, 22-76 years), and there were 5 cases of Denis type I and 15 cases of type II sacral fractures. All of them had anterior pelvic ring injuries, and according to pelvic Tile classification, there were 2 B1 type, 12 B2 type, 6 C1 type, and 3 cases of Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injuries. There were 30 patients in the Iliosacral screw group, 18 males and 12 females, with an average age of 44.70±13.35 years (range,16-78 years), and there were 6 cases of type I and 24 cases of type II sacral fractures. There were 2 cases of type B1, 20 cases of B2, 8 cases of C1 pelvic fractures, 4 cases combined with sacral nerve injuries including 3 cases of Gibbons grade II and 1 case of grade III. The patients’ age, operation time, amount of bleeding, times of fluoroscopy, postoperative Majeed score were compared by the independent t test. The quality of fracture reduction was compared by Chi-square test, and the postoperative Gibbons grade was compared by the rank sum test. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAll patients were followed up for 22.8 months (range, 12-40 months). In the Iliac screw rod group, the operation time was 41.40±7.30 min, intraoperative blood loss 105.00±61.94 ml, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy 19.10±7.33, and according to Mears and Velyvis valuation criterion, there were 9 cases of anatomical reduction, 10 cases of satisfactory reduction, and 1 case of unsatisfactory reduction, with the Majeed score of 84.25±8.29. There were 3 cases with Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injury, and 2 of them recovered to grade I. In the Iliosacral screw group, the operation time was 18.27±5.89 min, intraoperative blood loss 33.00±17.54 ml, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy 14.93±4.49, and according to Mears and Velyvis valuation criterion, there were 15 cases of anatomical reduction, 13 cases of satisfactory reduction and 2 cases of unsatisfactory reduction, with the Majeed score of 86.43±7.43. There were 3 cases with Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injury, and 2 of them recovered to grade I, and 1 case with grade III recovered to grade II postoperation. Compared to Iliosacral screw group, the Iliac screw rod group has longer operation time (t=-12.36, P<0.001), more blood loss (t=-6.04, P<0.001) and more intraoperative times of fluoroscopy (t=-2.50, P=0.016). There were no statistical differences for quality of fracture reduction (χ2=0.23, P=0.89), Majeed score (t=0.97, P=0.34), and the Gibbons grade (Z=-0.224, P=0.82) between the two groups. In the Iliac screw rod group, 1 patient had a unilateral superficial wound infection and 1 patient complained of discomfort because of the nail. In the Iliosacral screw group 1 patient had iatrogenic S1 neurological injury. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nFor the unstable sacral fractures, who are not suitable for iliosacral screw fixation, posterior iliac screw rod fixation is an effective alternative with similar clinical effect as robot assisted iliosacral screw fixation. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nSacrum; Fractures, bone; Fracture fixation, internal; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive\",\"PeriodicalId\":36405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华骨科杂志\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"317-324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华骨科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.05.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华骨科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0253-2352.2020.05.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨髂后螺钉固定棒治疗单侧不稳定DenisⅠ、Ⅱ型骶骨骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2016年3月至2018年10月收治的50例单侧不稳定Denis I,II骶骨骨折患者的资料。根据固定方法,将患者分为髂后螺钉杆组(髂骨螺钉杆组)和机器人辅助髂骶螺钉组(髂骨钉组)。髂骨钉棒组20例,男13例,女7例,平均年龄41.10±14.07岁(22-76岁),Denis I型骶骨骨折5例,II型骶骨骨骨折15例。均为骨盆前环损伤,按骨盆Tile分型,B1型2例,B2型12例,C1型6例,GibbonsⅡ级骶神经损伤3例。骶髂螺钉组30例,男18例,女12例,平均年龄44.70±13.35岁(16~78岁),Ⅰ型6例,Ⅱ型24例。B1型2例,B2型20例,C1型骨盆骨折8例,合并骶神经损伤4例,其中GibbonsⅡ级3例,Ⅲ级1例。采用独立t检验比较患者年龄、手术时间、出血量、透视次数、术后Majeed评分。采用卡方检验比较骨折复位质量,采用秩和检验比较术后吉本斯分级。结果所有患者随访22.8个月(12~40个月)。髂骨钉棒组手术时间为41.40±7.30min,术中失血105.00±61.94ml,术中荧光检查次数19.10±7.33,根据Mears和Velyvis评估标准,解剖复位9例,复位满意10例,复位不满意1例,Majeed评分为84.25±8.29。Gibbons II级骶神经损伤3例,其中2例恢复为I级。髂骨螺钉组手术时间18.27±5.89min,术中失血33.00±17.54ml,术中荧光检查次数14.93±4.49,根据Mears和Velyvis评估标准,解剖复位15例,复位满意13例,复位不满意2例,Majeed评分为86.43±7.43。GibbonsⅡ级骶神经损伤3例,其中2例术后恢复到Ⅰ级,1例术后Ⅲ级恢复到Ⅱ级。与髂骨螺钉组相比,髂骨螺钉棒组手术时间更长(t=-12.36,P<0.001),出血量更大(t=-6.04,P=0.001),术中荧光检查次数更多(t=-2.50,P=0.016)。两组骨折复位质量(χ2=0.23,P=0.89)、Majeed评分(t=0.97,P=0.34)和Gibbons分级(Z=-0.224,P=0.82)无统计学差异。在Iliac钉棒组中,1名患者出现单侧浅表伤口感染,1名病人抱怨因指甲而感到不适。在髂骨螺钉组中,1名患者出现医源性S1神经损伤。结论对于不稳定的骶骨骨折,不适合采用髂骶螺钉内固定的患者,髂后螺钉棒内固定是一种有效的替代方法,其临床效果与机器人辅助髂骶螺钉固定相似。关键词:骶骨;骨折,骨;骨折内固定术;外科手术,微创
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Posterior iliac screw rod for the treatment of unilateral unstable Denis I and II sacral fractures
Objective To explore the efficacy of posterior iliac screw rod for unilateral unstable Denis I and II sacral fractures. Methods Data of 50 patients with unilateral unstable Denis I, II sacral fractures treated from March 2016 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. According to fixation methods, the patients were divided into posterior iliac screw rod group (Iliac screw rod group) and robot-assisted iliosacral screw group (Iliosacral screw group). There were 20 patients in the Iliac screw rod group, 13 males and 7 females, with an average age of 41.10±14.07 years (range, 22-76 years), and there were 5 cases of Denis type I and 15 cases of type II sacral fractures. All of them had anterior pelvic ring injuries, and according to pelvic Tile classification, there were 2 B1 type, 12 B2 type, 6 C1 type, and 3 cases of Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injuries. There were 30 patients in the Iliosacral screw group, 18 males and 12 females, with an average age of 44.70±13.35 years (range,16-78 years), and there were 6 cases of type I and 24 cases of type II sacral fractures. There were 2 cases of type B1, 20 cases of B2, 8 cases of C1 pelvic fractures, 4 cases combined with sacral nerve injuries including 3 cases of Gibbons grade II and 1 case of grade III. The patients’ age, operation time, amount of bleeding, times of fluoroscopy, postoperative Majeed score were compared by the independent t test. The quality of fracture reduction was compared by Chi-square test, and the postoperative Gibbons grade was compared by the rank sum test. Results All patients were followed up for 22.8 months (range, 12-40 months). In the Iliac screw rod group, the operation time was 41.40±7.30 min, intraoperative blood loss 105.00±61.94 ml, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy 19.10±7.33, and according to Mears and Velyvis valuation criterion, there were 9 cases of anatomical reduction, 10 cases of satisfactory reduction, and 1 case of unsatisfactory reduction, with the Majeed score of 84.25±8.29. There were 3 cases with Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injury, and 2 of them recovered to grade I. In the Iliosacral screw group, the operation time was 18.27±5.89 min, intraoperative blood loss 33.00±17.54 ml, intraoperative times of fluoroscopy 14.93±4.49, and according to Mears and Velyvis valuation criterion, there were 15 cases of anatomical reduction, 13 cases of satisfactory reduction and 2 cases of unsatisfactory reduction, with the Majeed score of 86.43±7.43. There were 3 cases with Gibbons grade II sacral nerve injury, and 2 of them recovered to grade I, and 1 case with grade III recovered to grade II postoperation. Compared to Iliosacral screw group, the Iliac screw rod group has longer operation time (t=-12.36, P<0.001), more blood loss (t=-6.04, P<0.001) and more intraoperative times of fluoroscopy (t=-2.50, P=0.016). There were no statistical differences for quality of fracture reduction (χ2=0.23, P=0.89), Majeed score (t=0.97, P=0.34), and the Gibbons grade (Z=-0.224, P=0.82) between the two groups. In the Iliac screw rod group, 1 patient had a unilateral superficial wound infection and 1 patient complained of discomfort because of the nail. In the Iliosacral screw group 1 patient had iatrogenic S1 neurological injury. Conclusion For the unstable sacral fractures, who are not suitable for iliosacral screw fixation, posterior iliac screw rod fixation is an effective alternative with similar clinical effect as robot assisted iliosacral screw fixation. Key words: Sacrum; Fractures, bone; Fracture fixation, internal; Surgical procedures, minimally invasive
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华骨科杂志
中华骨科杂志 Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8153
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of the efficacy and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in lumbar degenerative scoliosis A comparative study on the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis by oblique interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforminal lumbar interbody fusion Rooting, and growing with luxuriant branches and leaves-the story of oblique lateral interbody fusion in China Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases with ruptured disc herniation The complications of oblique lateral interbody fusion procedure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1