{"title":"使科罗拉多河流域的枯竭适应我们力所能及的生活所需的可用水","authors":"Jian Wang, D. Rosenberg","doi":"10.1061/jwrmd5.wreng-5555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"5 The Colorado River’s two largest reservoirs are drawing down because releases exceed inflows and 6 releases adapt to reservoir elevations instead of elevation and inflow triggers. To help slow reservoir 7 drawdown and sustain target elevations, we introduced a new rule that adapted basin depletions to 8 available water. We simulated inflow-based operations and validated existing operations in a new open9 source exploratory model for the Colorado River Basin. We developed the exploratory model to more 10 easily adapt Upper and Lower Basin depletions to available water, reduce run time, and lower costs to use 11 compared to the proprietary RiverWare Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) model. We simulated 12 adaptive and existing operations for (a) the 2000 to 2018 period, and (b) scenarios of steady Lees Ferry 13 natural inflow each year of 17.3 down to 6.2 billion cubic meters (bcm, or 14 to 5 million acre-feet, maf) 14 per year. We found the following: (1) the existing rules drew down Lake Powell and Lake Mead to their 15 critical storages of 7.4 bcm (6.0 maf) in less than 5 years when Lees Ferry natural flow was less than 15.3 16 bcm/year (12.4 maf/year; 2000 to 2018 period average). (2) The adaptive rule sustained both reservoirs 17 above their critical levels for long periods of time by requiring Upper and Lower Basin users to conserve 18 up to 1.2 bcm (1.0 maf) per year more water than existing operations. We see next steps as testing the 19 adaptive rule in CRSS and devising conservation programs that can adapt and scale to available water. 20 1 Jian Wang, corresponding author, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT84322-8200. Email: jian.wang@usu.edu 2 David E. Rosenberg, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT84322-8200. Email: david.rosenberg@usu.edu","PeriodicalId":17655,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water to Live within Our Means\",\"authors\":\"Jian Wang, D. Rosenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/jwrmd5.wreng-5555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"5 The Colorado River’s two largest reservoirs are drawing down because releases exceed inflows and 6 releases adapt to reservoir elevations instead of elevation and inflow triggers. To help slow reservoir 7 drawdown and sustain target elevations, we introduced a new rule that adapted basin depletions to 8 available water. We simulated inflow-based operations and validated existing operations in a new open9 source exploratory model for the Colorado River Basin. We developed the exploratory model to more 10 easily adapt Upper and Lower Basin depletions to available water, reduce run time, and lower costs to use 11 compared to the proprietary RiverWare Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) model. We simulated 12 adaptive and existing operations for (a) the 2000 to 2018 period, and (b) scenarios of steady Lees Ferry 13 natural inflow each year of 17.3 down to 6.2 billion cubic meters (bcm, or 14 to 5 million acre-feet, maf) 14 per year. We found the following: (1) the existing rules drew down Lake Powell and Lake Mead to their 15 critical storages of 7.4 bcm (6.0 maf) in less than 5 years when Lees Ferry natural flow was less than 15.3 16 bcm/year (12.4 maf/year; 2000 to 2018 period average). (2) The adaptive rule sustained both reservoirs 17 above their critical levels for long periods of time by requiring Upper and Lower Basin users to conserve 18 up to 1.2 bcm (1.0 maf) per year more water than existing operations. We see next steps as testing the 19 adaptive rule in CRSS and devising conservation programs that can adapt and scale to available water. 20 1 Jian Wang, corresponding author, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT84322-8200. Email: jian.wang@usu.edu 2 David E. Rosenberg, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT84322-8200. Email: david.rosenberg@usu.edu\",\"PeriodicalId\":17655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/jwrmd5.wreng-5555\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jwrmd5.wreng-5555","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
5科罗拉多河最大的两座水库正在减少,因为排放量超过了流入量,6座水库的排放量适应了水库高程,而不是高程和流入量的触发因素。为了帮助减缓7号水库的水位下降并维持目标高程,我们引入了一项新规则,将流域的消耗量调整为8个可用水量。我们模拟了基于流入的作业,并在科罗拉多河流域的新开源勘探模型中验证了现有作业。与专有的RiverWare科罗拉多河模拟系统(CRSS)模型相比,我们开发了探索模型,使上下盆地的消耗更容易适应可用水,减少运行时间,并降低使用成本。我们模拟了(a)2000年至2018年期间的12项适应性和现有作业,以及(b)Lees Ferry 13每年173亿立方米(bcm,或1400万至500万英亩英尺,maf)14的稳定自然流入情景。我们发现以下情况:(1)当Lees Ferry的自然流量低于153.16 bcm/年(12.4 maf/年;2000年至2018年期间的平均值)时,现有规则在不到5年的时间内将Powell湖和Mead湖的15个关键蓄水量降至74 bcm(6.0 maf)。(2) 自适应规则要求上下盆地用户每年比现有操作多节约18至120亿立方米(1.0 maf)的水,从而使两个水库17在很长一段时间内保持在临界水位以上。我们认为下一步将在CRSS中测试19自适应规则,并制定能够适应和扩大可用水的保护计划。20 1王,通讯作者,犹他州立大学土木与环境工程系和犹他州水研究实验室,8200 Old Main Hill,Logan,UT84322-8200。电子邮件:jian.wang@usu.edu2 David E.Rosenberg,犹他州立大学土木与环境工程系和犹他州水研究实验室,8200 Old Main Hill,Logan,UT84322-8200。电子邮件:david.rosenberg@usu.edu
Adapting Colorado River Basin Depletions to Available Water to Live within Our Means
5 The Colorado River’s two largest reservoirs are drawing down because releases exceed inflows and 6 releases adapt to reservoir elevations instead of elevation and inflow triggers. To help slow reservoir 7 drawdown and sustain target elevations, we introduced a new rule that adapted basin depletions to 8 available water. We simulated inflow-based operations and validated existing operations in a new open9 source exploratory model for the Colorado River Basin. We developed the exploratory model to more 10 easily adapt Upper and Lower Basin depletions to available water, reduce run time, and lower costs to use 11 compared to the proprietary RiverWare Colorado River Simulation System (CRSS) model. We simulated 12 adaptive and existing operations for (a) the 2000 to 2018 period, and (b) scenarios of steady Lees Ferry 13 natural inflow each year of 17.3 down to 6.2 billion cubic meters (bcm, or 14 to 5 million acre-feet, maf) 14 per year. We found the following: (1) the existing rules drew down Lake Powell and Lake Mead to their 15 critical storages of 7.4 bcm (6.0 maf) in less than 5 years when Lees Ferry natural flow was less than 15.3 16 bcm/year (12.4 maf/year; 2000 to 2018 period average). (2) The adaptive rule sustained both reservoirs 17 above their critical levels for long periods of time by requiring Upper and Lower Basin users to conserve 18 up to 1.2 bcm (1.0 maf) per year more water than existing operations. We see next steps as testing the 19 adaptive rule in CRSS and devising conservation programs that can adapt and scale to available water. 20 1 Jian Wang, corresponding author, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT84322-8200. Email: jian.wang@usu.edu 2 David E. Rosenberg, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Utah Water Research Laboratory, Utah State Univ., 8200 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT84322-8200. Email: david.rosenberg@usu.edu
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management reports on all phases of planning and management of water resources. The papers examine social, economic, environmental, and administrative concerns relating to the use and conservation of water. Social and environmental objectives in areas such as fish and wildlife management, water-based recreation, and wild and scenic river use are assessed. Developments in computer applications are discussed, as are ecological, cultural, and historical values.