{"title":"对Otto Kernberg的回应","authors":"M. Solms","doi":"10.1080/15294145.2021.1984284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It gives me great pleasure to respond to Otto Kernberg’s commentary on my “New Project for a Scientific Psychology” (2020). It is gratifying to receive praise from a psychoanalyst of his stature. Many other leading colleagues are still ideologically opposed to neuropsychoanalysis, which is nothing short of tragic for the future of psychoanalysis. Hopefully this commentary will persuade some of them to rethink their positions. In my response, however, I will focus on the few areas of disagreement between Kernberg and me.","PeriodicalId":39493,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychoanalysis","volume":"23 1","pages":"115 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Otto Kernberg\",\"authors\":\"M. Solms\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15294145.2021.1984284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT It gives me great pleasure to respond to Otto Kernberg’s commentary on my “New Project for a Scientific Psychology” (2020). It is gratifying to receive praise from a psychoanalyst of his stature. Many other leading colleagues are still ideologically opposed to neuropsychoanalysis, which is nothing short of tragic for the future of psychoanalysis. Hopefully this commentary will persuade some of them to rethink their positions. In my response, however, I will focus on the few areas of disagreement between Kernberg and me.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"115 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2021.1984284\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2021.1984284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
ABSTRACT It gives me great pleasure to respond to Otto Kernberg’s commentary on my “New Project for a Scientific Psychology” (2020). It is gratifying to receive praise from a psychoanalyst of his stature. Many other leading colleagues are still ideologically opposed to neuropsychoanalysis, which is nothing short of tragic for the future of psychoanalysis. Hopefully this commentary will persuade some of them to rethink their positions. In my response, however, I will focus on the few areas of disagreement between Kernberg and me.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
